Multicolor and multi-spot observations of Starlink's Visorsat

This study provides the results of simultaneous multicolor observations for the first Visorsat (STARLINK-1436) and the ordinary Starlink satellite, STARLINK-1113 in the $U$, $B$, $V$, $g'$, $r$, $i$, $R_{\rm C}$, $I_{\rm C}$, $z$, $J$, $H$, and $K_s$ bands to quantitatively investigate the extent to which Visorsat reduces its reflected light. Our results are as follows: (1) in most cases, Virorsat is fainter than STARLINK-1113, and the sunshade on Visorsat, therefore, contributes to the reduction of the reflected sunlight; (2) the magnitude at 550 km altitude (normalized magnitude) of both satellites often reaches the naked-eye limiting magnitude ($<$ 6.0); (3) from a blackbody radiation model of the reflected flux, the peak of the reflected components of both satellites is around the $z$ band; and (4) the albedo of the near infrared range is larger than that of the optical range. Under the assumption that Visorsat and STARLINK-1113 have the same reflectivity, we estimate the covering factor, $C_{\rm f}$, of the sunshade on Visorsat, using the blackbody radiation model: the covering factor ranges from $0.18 \leq C_{\rm f} \leq 0.92$. From the multivariable analysis of the solar phase angle (Sun-target-observer), the normalized magnitude, and the covering factor, the phase angle versus covering factor distribution presents a moderate anti-correlation between them, suggesting that the magnitudes of Visorsat depend not only on the phase angle but also on the orientation of the sunshade along our line of sight. However, the impact on astronomical observations from Visorsat-designed satellites remains serious. Thus, new countermeasures are necessary for the Starlink satellites to further reduce reflected sunlight.Comment: 31 pages, 9 figures, published in PAS

Observation of Cassini's Entry into Saturn: No Detection, and Lessons Learned

The mission of the 2000 kg Cassini spacecraft concluded on 2017 September 15, by its deliberate entry into Saturn's atmosphere at some 31.1 km s^-1. Observations, using Hubble and groundbased observatories, to attempt optical detection of this 0.25 kT ``artificial meteor'' are summarized. No signatures were identified. A challenge with observing the event is that due to atmospheric drag, its timing was not completely deterministic months or even days in advance, a particular problem for space observatories. While imaging observations needed no geometric specification more than ``Saturn,'' observations with spectrometers required pointing the instrument aperture or slit at the specific impact site. Since giant planet longitude systems are not always familiar, distribution of an unambiguous ``finder chart'' showing the location of the predicted entry site on the disk is essential, as is clarity on whether stated times are spacecraft event time, or Earth received time (light- travel time, 83 minutes, later)