Cooperation between universities and business : Poland in comparison with selected European Union countries

Celem raportu jest dokonanie diagnozy stanu i perspektyw współpracy przedsiębiorstw ze szkołami wyższymi w Polsce. Analiza obejmuje osiem obszarów, identyfikowanych jako najważniejsze pola, na których realizuje się współpraca biznesu z uniwersytetami, wskazanych w raporcie pt. The State of University-Business Cooperation in Germany z grudnia 2013 r. Zespół, który przygotował Raport jest jednym z czterech zespołów roboczych utworzonych w ramach seminarium "Co się dzieje z uniwersytetem?". Prace seminarium koordynują prof. dr hab. Jacek Blikle, prof. dr hab. Anna Giza, prof. dr hab. Jerzy Hausner i dr Łukasz Stankiewicz. Działa ono w ramach platformy rozwoju edukacji OEES EduLab www.oees.pl/edu-lab, która jest częścią szerszego ruchu Open Eyes Economy Summit, koordynowanego przez Fundację Gospodarki i Administracji Publicznej.The purpose of the report is to diagnose the state and prospects of cooperation between businesses and universities in Poland. The analysis covers eight areas identified as the most important fields in which business-university cooperation is taking place, as indicated in the report The State of University-Business Cooperation in Germany from December 2013. The team that prepared the report is one of the four working teams formed as part of the seminar "What is happening to the university?". The work of the seminar is coordinated by Prof. Dr. Jacek Blikle, Prof. Dr. Anna Giza, Prof. Dr. Jerzy Hausner and Dr. Łukasz Stankiewicz. It operates as part of the OEES EduLab education development platform www.oees.pl/edu-lab, which is part of the wider Open Eyes Economy Summit movement coordinated by the Foundation for Economics and Public Administration

Dlaczego neurolog dziecięcy MUSI zawsze mierzyć obwód głowy - opis przypadku deficytu transportera glukozy typu 1 (Glut1-DS)

Introduction. The deficit of the type 1 glucose transporter (Glut1-DS) belongs to the neurometabolic disorders that can be effectively treated, in this case with ketogenic diet. By limiting glucose supply to the brain the deficit of glucose transporter 1 leads to cerebral energy deficiency. Glut1-DS manifests with a wide range of neurological symptoms that usually start in early childhood, including cognitive impairment, epilepsy and permanent and/or paroxysmal motor disorders, often provoked by physical activity, fasting or hyperthermale. Aim. We present the case of a 6,5-year-old patient with Glut1- -DS who, despite presenting typical symptoms, remained undiagnosed for years. Family history was positive of intellectual disability in first degree relative. The child suffered from psychomotor development delay, motor coordination difficulties, motor disorders and epilepsy with focal and absence seizures of early onset. However, the significant symptom of secondary microcephaly remained unnoticed for years. Conclusion. Secondary microcephaly is a valuable symptom which can guide towards the diagnosis. The early diagnosis of Glut1 deficiency syndrome enables prompt introduction of the ketogenic diet crucial for the child’s development and improvement of both the patients and their families’ quality of life.Wstęp. Deficyt transportera glukozy typu 1 (Glut1-DS.) należy do tych nielicznych neurometabolicznych schorzeń, które mogą być skutecznie leczone, w tym wypadku dietą ketogenną. Deficyt transportera 1, poprzez redukcję transportu glukozy do OUN, prowadzi do deficytu energetycznego mózgu. Schorzenie to charakteryzuje się wieloma objawami ze strony układu nerwowego, najczęściej z początkiem w okresie wczesnego dzieciństwa. Należą do nich zaburzenia poznawcze, padaczka, dysfunkcje ruchowe o przewlekłym charakterze lub występujące napadowo, często prowokowane wysiłkiem, głodzeniem czy zwyżką ciepłoty ciała. Cel. Celem pracy było przedstawienie przypadku 6,5 letniej pacjentki z Glut1-DS, u której rozpoznanie było opóźnione pomimo obecności typowych dla tego schorzenia objawów klinicznych. Wywiad rodzinny był obciążony występowaniem niepełnosprawności intelektualnej u krewnego I stopnia. U dziecka obserwowano nieprawidłowy rozwój poznawczy, niezgrabność ruchową oraz padaczkę z napadami ogniskowymi oraz nieświadomości o wczesnym początku. Jednakże, istotny objaw diagnostyczny, jakim było małogłowie wtórne, długo nie był rejestrowany. Wnioski. Małogłowie wtórne jest istotnym objawem ukierunkowującym diagnostykę. Wczesne rozpoznanie Glut1-DS. umożliwia wprowadzenie skutecznego leczenia dietą ketogenną, co prowadzi do poprawy rozwoju dziecka i tym samym do polepszenia jakości życia pacjenta i jego rodziny

PIGN encephalopathy: Characterizing the epileptology

International audienceOBJECTIVE: Epilepsy is common in patients with PIGN diseases due to biallelic variants; however, limited epilepsy phenotyping data have been reported. We describe the epileptology of PIGN encephalopathy. METHODS: We recruited patients with epilepsy due to biallelic PIGN variants and obtained clinical data regarding age at seizure onset/offset and semiology, development, medical history, examination, electroencephalogram, neuroimaging, and treatment. Seizure and epilepsy types were classified. RESULTS: Twenty six patients (13 female) from 26 families were identified, with mean age 7 years (range = 1 month to 21 years; three deceased). Abnormal development at seizure onset was present in 25 of 26. Developmental outcome was most frequently profound (14/26) or severe (11/26). Patients presented with focal motor (12/26), unknown onset motor (5/26), focal impaired awareness (1/26), absence (2/26), myoclonic (2/26), myoclonic-atonic (1/26), and generalized tonic-clonic (2/26) seizures. Twenty of 26 were classified as developmental and epileptic encephalopathy (DEE): 55% (11/20) focal DEE, 30% (6/20) generalized DEE, and 15% (3/20) combined DEE. Six had intellectual disability and epilepsy (ID+E): two generalized and four focal epilepsy. Mean age at seizure onset was 13 months (birth to 10 years), with a lower mean onset in DEE (7 months) compared with ID+E (33 months). Patients with DEE had drug-resistant epilepsy, compared to 4/6 ID+E patients, who were seizure-free. Hyperkinetic movement disorder occurred in 13 of 26 patients. Twenty-seven of 34 variants were novel. Variants were truncating (n = 7), intronic and predicted to affect splicing (n = 7), and missense or inframe indels (n = 20, of which 11 were predicted to affect splicing). Seven variants were recurrent, including p.Leu311Trp in 10 unrelated patients, nine with generalized seizures, accounting for nine of the 11 patients in this cohort with generalized seizures. SIGNIFICANCE: PIGN encephalopathy is a complex autosomal recessive disorder associated with a wide spectrum of epilepsy phenotypes, typically with substantial profound to severe developmental impairment

PIGN encephalopathy: Characterizing the epileptology

International audienceOBJECTIVE: Epilepsy is common in patients with PIGN diseases due to biallelic variants; however, limited epilepsy phenotyping data have been reported. We describe the epileptology of PIGN encephalopathy. METHODS: We recruited patients with epilepsy due to biallelic PIGN variants and obtained clinical data regarding age at seizure onset/offset and semiology, development, medical history, examination, electroencephalogram, neuroimaging, and treatment. Seizure and epilepsy types were classified. RESULTS: Twenty six patients (13 female) from 26 families were identified, with mean age 7 years (range = 1 month to 21 years; three deceased). Abnormal development at seizure onset was present in 25 of 26. Developmental outcome was most frequently profound (14/26) or severe (11/26). Patients presented with focal motor (12/26), unknown onset motor (5/26), focal impaired awareness (1/26), absence (2/26), myoclonic (2/26), myoclonic-atonic (1/26), and generalized tonic-clonic (2/26) seizures. Twenty of 26 were classified as developmental and epileptic encephalopathy (DEE): 55% (11/20) focal DEE, 30% (6/20) generalized DEE, and 15% (3/20) combined DEE. Six had intellectual disability and epilepsy (ID+E): two generalized and four focal epilepsy. Mean age at seizure onset was 13 months (birth to 10 years), with a lower mean onset in DEE (7 months) compared with ID+E (33 months). Patients with DEE had drug-resistant epilepsy, compared to 4/6 ID+E patients, who were seizure-free. Hyperkinetic movement disorder occurred in 13 of 26 patients. Twenty-seven of 34 variants were novel. Variants were truncating (n = 7), intronic and predicted to affect splicing (n = 7), and missense or inframe indels (n = 20, of which 11 were predicted to affect splicing). Seven variants were recurrent, including p.Leu311Trp in 10 unrelated patients, nine with generalized seizures, accounting for nine of the 11 patients in this cohort with generalized seizures. SIGNIFICANCE: PIGN encephalopathy is a complex autosomal recessive disorder associated with a wide spectrum of epilepsy phenotypes, typically with substantial profound to severe developmental impairment

PIGN encephalopathy : characterizing the epileptology

International audienceOBJECTIVE: Epilepsy is common in patients with PIGN diseases due to biallelic variants; however, limited epilepsy phenotyping data have been reported. We describe the epileptology of PIGN encephalopathy. METHODS: We recruited patients with epilepsy due to biallelic PIGN variants and obtained clinical data regarding age at seizure onset/offset and semiology, development, medical history, examination, electroencephalogram, neuroimaging, and treatment. Seizure and epilepsy types were classified. RESULTS: Twenty six patients (13 female) from 26 families were identified, with mean age 7 years (range = 1 month to 21 years; three deceased). Abnormal development at seizure onset was present in 25 of 26. Developmental outcome was most frequently profound (14/26) or severe (11/26). Patients presented with focal motor (12/26), unknown onset motor (5/26), focal impaired awareness (1/26), absence (2/26), myoclonic (2/26), myoclonic-atonic (1/26), and generalized tonic-clonic (2/26) seizures. Twenty of 26 were classified as developmental and epileptic encephalopathy (DEE): 55% (11/20) focal DEE, 30% (6/20) generalized DEE, and 15% (3/20) combined DEE. Six had intellectual disability and epilepsy (ID+E): two generalized and four focal epilepsy. Mean age at seizure onset was 13 months (birth to 10 years), with a lower mean onset in DEE (7 months) compared with ID+E (33 months). Patients with DEE had drug-resistant epilepsy, compared to 4/6 ID+E patients, who were seizure-free. Hyperkinetic movement disorder occurred in 13 of 26 patients. Twenty-seven of 34 variants were novel. Variants were truncating (n = 7), intronic and predicted to affect splicing (n = 7), and missense or inframe indels (n = 20, of which 11 were predicted to affect splicing). Seven variants were recurrent, including p.Leu311Trp in 10 unrelated patients, nine with generalized seizures, accounting for nine of the 11 patients in this cohort with generalized seizures. SIGNIFICANCE: PIGN encephalopathy is a complex autosomal recessive disorder associated with a wide spectrum of epilepsy phenotypes, typically with substantial profound to severe developmental impairment

Efficacy, durability, and safety of intravitreal faricimab up to every 16 weeks for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (TENAYA and LUCERNE): two randomised, double-masked, phase 3, non-inferiority trials

Background: Faricimab is a bispecific antibody that acts through dual inhibition of both angiopoietin-2 and vascular endothelial growth factor A. We report primary results of two phase 3 trials evaluating intravitreal faricimab with extension up to every 16 weeks for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). Methods: TENAYA and LUCERNE were randomised, double-masked, non-inferiority trials across 271 sites worldwide. Treatment-naive patients with nAMD aged 50 years or older were randomly assigned (1:1) to intravitreal faricimab 6·0 mg up to every 16 weeks, based on protocol-defined disease activity assessments at weeks 20 and 24, or aflibercept 2·0 mg every 8 weeks. Randomisation was performed through an interactive voice or web-based response system using a stratified permuted block randomisation method. Patients, investigators, those assessing outcomes, and the funder were masked to group assignments. The primary endpoint was mean change in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) from baseline averaged over weeks 40, 44, and 48 (prespecified non-inferiority margin of four letters), in the intention-to-treat population. Safety analyses included patients who received at least one dose of study treatment. These trials are registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (TENAYA NCT03823287 and LUCERNE NCT03823300). Findings: Across the two trials, 1329 patients were randomly assigned between Feb 19 and Nov 19, 2019 (TENAYA n=334 faricimab and n=337 aflibercept), and between March 11 and Nov 1, 2019 (LUCERNE n=331 faricimab and n=327 aflibercept). BCVA change from baseline with faricimab was non-inferior to aflibercept in both TENAYA (adjusted mean change 5·8 letters [95% CI 4·6 to 7·1] and 5·1 letters [3·9 to 6·4]; treatment difference 0·7 letters [-1·1 to 2·5]) and LUCERNE (6·6 letters [5·3 to 7·8] and 6·6 letters [5·3 to 7·8]; treatment difference 0·0 letters [-1·7 to 1·8]). Rates of ocular adverse events were comparable between faricimab and aflibercept (TENAYA n=121 [36·3%] vs n=128 [38·1%], and LUCERNE n=133 [40·2%] vs n=118 [36·2%]). Interpretation: Visual benefits with faricimab given at up to 16-week intervals demonstrates its potential to meaningfully extend the time between treatments with sustained efficacy, thereby reducing treatment burden in patients with nAMD