Automatic segmentation of cerebral infarcts in follow-up computed tomography images with convolutional neural networks

Background and purpose: Infarct volume is a valuable outcome measure in treatment trials of acute ischemic stroke and is strongly associated with functional outcome. Its manual volumetric assessment is, however, too demanding to be implemented in clinical practice. Objective: To assess the value of convolutional neural networks (CNNs) in the automatic segmentation of infarct volume in follow-up CT images in a large population of patients with acute ischemic stroke. Materials and methods: We included CT images of 1026 patients from a large pooling of patients with acute ischemic stroke. A reference standard for the infarct segmentation was generated by manual delineation. We introduce three CNN models for the segmentati

Predicting Poor Outcome Before Endovascular Treatment in Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke

Background: Although endovascular treatment (EVT) has greatly improved outcomes in acute ischemic stroke, still one third of patients die or remain severely disabled after stroke. If we could select patients with poor clinical outcome despite EVT, we could prevent futile treatment, avoid treatment complications, and further improve stroke care. We aimed to determine the accuracy of poor functional outcome prediction, defined as 90-day modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score ≥5, despite EVT treatment. Methods: We included 1,526 patients from the MR CLEAN Registry, a prospective, observational, multicenter registry of ischemic stroke patients treated with EVT. We developed machine learning prediction models using all variables available at baseline before treatment. We optimized the models for both maximizing the area under the curve (AUC), reducing the number of false positives. Results: From 1,526 patients included, 480 (31%) of patients showed poor outcome. The highest AUC was 0.81 for random forest. The highest area under the precision recall curve was 0.69 for the support vector machine. The highest achieved specificity was 95% with a sensitivity of 34% for neural networks, indicating that all models contained false positives in their predictions. From 921 mRS 0–4 patients, 27–61 (3–6%) were incorrectly classified as poor outcome. From 480 poor outcome patients in the registry, 99–163 (21–34%) were correctly identified by the models. Conclusions: All prediction models showed a high AUC. The best-performing models correctly identified 34% of the poor outcome patients at a cost of misclassifying 4% of non-poor outcome patients. Further studies are necessary to determine whether these accuracies are reproducible before implementation in clinical practice

Setting the mind for intelligent interactive segmentation: Overview, requirements, and framework

It is widely recognized that automatic segmentation is hard, leading to the state where user intervention cannot be avoided. In this paper we review existing literature and propose a systematic approach for the integration of automatic and interactive segmentation methods into one unified process. A framework and requirements for intelligent interactive segmentation are formulated, and an example is presente