Systematic Evaluation of the Immune Environment of Small Intestinal Neuroendocrine Tumours

BACKGROUND: The immune tumour microenvironment and the potential therapeutic opportunities for immunotherapy in small intestinal neuroendocrine tumours (siNET) have not been fully defined. METHODS: Herein, we studied 40 patients with primary and synchronous metastatic siNETs , and matched blood and normal tissue obtained during surgery. We interrogated the immune checkpoint landscape using multi-parametric flow cytometry. Additionally, matched FFPE tissue was obtained for multi-parametric immunohistochemistry (IHC) to determine the relative abundance and distribution of T-cell infiltrate. Tumour mutational burden (TMB) was also assessed and correlated with immune infiltration. RESULTS: Effector tumour infiltrating lymphocytes had a higher expression of PD-1 in the tumour microenvironment compared to the periphery. Additionally, CD8+ tumour infiltrating lymphocytes had a significantly higher co-expression of PD-1/ICOS and PD-1/CTLA-4 and higher levels of PD-1 expression compared to normal tissue. IHC revealed that the majority of cases have {less than or equal to}10% intratumoural T cells but a higher number of peritumoural T cells, demonstrating an "exclusion" phenotype. Finally, we confirmed that siNETs have a low TMB compared to other tumour types in the TCGA database but did not find a correlation between TMB and CD8/Treg ratio. CONCLUSIONS: Taken together, these results suggest that a combination therapy approach will be required to enhance the immune response, using PD-1 as a checkpoint immunomodulator backbone in combination with other checkpoint targeting molecules (CTLA-4 or ICOS), or with drugs targeting other pathways to recruit "excluded" T cells into the tumour microenvironment to treat patients with siNETs

Prophylactic biological mesh reinforcement versus standard closure of stoma site (ROCSS): a multicentre, randomised controlled trial

Background: Closure of an abdominal stoma, a common elective operation, is associated with frequent complications; one of the commonest and impactful is incisional hernia formation. We aimed to investigate whether biological mesh (collagen tissue matrix) can safely reduce the incidence of incisional hernias at the stoma closure site. Methods: In this randomised controlled trial (ROCSS) done in 37 hospitals across three European countries (35 UK, one Denmark, one Netherlands), patients aged 18 years or older undergoing elective ileostomy or colostomy closure were randomly assigned using a computer-based algorithm in a 1:1 ratio to either biological mesh reinforcement or closure with sutures alone (control). Training in the novel technique was standardised across hospitals. Patients and outcome assessors were masked to treatment allocation. The primary outcome measure was occurrence of clinically detectable hernia 2 years after randomisation (intention to treat). A sample size of 790 patients was required to identify a 40% reduction (25% to 15%), with 90% power (15% drop-out rate). This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02238964. Findings: Between Nov 28, 2012, and Nov 11, 2015, of 1286 screened patients, 790 were randomly assigned. 394 (50%) patients were randomly assigned to mesh closure and 396 (50%) to standard closure. In the mesh group, 373 (95%) of 394 patients successfully received mesh and in the control group, three patients received mesh. The clinically detectable hernia rate, the primary outcome, at 2 years was 12% (39 of 323) in the mesh group and 20% (64 of 327) in the control group (adjusted relative risk [RR] 0·62, 95% CI 0·43–0·90; p=0·012). In 455 patients for whom 1 year postoperative CT scans were available, there was a lower radiologically defined hernia rate in mesh versus control groups (20 [9%] of 229 vs 47 [21%] of 226, adjusted RR 0·42, 95% CI 0·26–0·69; p<0·001). There was also a reduction in symptomatic hernia (16%, 52 of 329 vs 19%, 64 of 331; adjusted relative risk 0·83, 0·60–1·16; p=0·29) and surgical reintervention (12%, 42 of 344 vs 16%, 54 of 346: adjusted relative risk 0·78, 0·54–1·13; p=0·19) at 2 years, but this result did not reach statistical significance. No significant differences were seen in wound infection rate, seroma rate, quality of life, pain scores, or serious adverse events. Interpretation: Reinforcement of the abdominal wall with a biological mesh at the time of stoma closure reduced clinically detectable incisional hernia within 24 months of surgery and with an acceptable safety profile. The results of this study support the use of biological mesh in stoma closure site reinforcement to reduce the early formation of incisional hernias. Funding: National Institute for Health Research Research for Patient Benefit and Allergan