12 research outputs found

    Comparison between patients with T2DM without vs. with 25-OH vitamin D deficiency.

    No full text
    <p>*Differences are significant</p><p><sup>a</sup> Distributions are not Gaussian. Data is presented as median and [interquartile range]; p was calculated with Mann-Whitney U test.</p><p><sup>b</sup> Data is presented as mean±S; p was calculated with t-student test.</p><p><sup>c</sup> Data is presented as number and (percentage of total). p was calculated using chi-square test.</p><p>Continuous variables distributions were tested for normality using Shapiro-Wilk test and for equality of variances with Levene’s test.</p><p>Comparison between patients with T2DM without vs. with 25-OH vitamin D deficiency.</p

    Baseline characteristics of the studied group.

    No full text
    <p><sup>a</sup> Distributions are not Gaussian. Data is presented as median and [interquartile range]</p><p><sup>b</sup> Data is presented as mean±SD</p><p>BMI—body mass index; CAD-Coronary artery disease; PVD—Peripheral vascular disease</p><p>Baseline characteristics of the studied group.</p

    Multivariate logistic regression model.

    No full text
    <p>* Factors with independent impact in generating vitamin D deficiency, after adjusting for confounding factors</p><p><sup>a</sup> Predictors were added in the model as continuous, scale measured variables</p><p><sup>b</sup> Predictors were added in the model as dichotomous variables</p><p>BMI—body mass index; CAD—Coronary artery disease; DM—diabetes mellitus; PVD—Peripheral vascular disease</p><p>Multivariate logistic regression model.</p
    corecore