MÖSSBAUER EFFECT STUDY OF SOME YUGOSLAV BAUXITES

No abstract availabl

Geochemistry and electron spin resonance of hydrothermal dickite (Nowa Ruda, Lower Silesia, Poland): vanadium and chromium

Geochemical analyses for trace V and Cr have been done on a representative sample of a typical hydrothermal dickite/kaolinite filling vein at Nowa Ruda. The mineralogy of the sample is comparatively simple, dickite being the principal component (ca. 91 % of the total sample). Geochemical fractionation and inductively coupled plasma-optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES) indicate that most ( > 90 % of total metal) of the V and Cr reside in the dickite. Electron Spin Resonance (ESR) shows that most ( > 70 %) of the V in the dickite structure is in the form of vanadyl (VO2+) ions. A high concentration of Cr3+ is also detected in this structure by ESR. The combination of geochemical and spectroscopic tools applied to VO2+ and Cr3+ allow one to specify the Eh ( > 0.4 V, highly oxidizing) and pH ( 4.0, highly acidic) of the solution during the formation of dickite from the Nowa Ruda Basin. Substantial proportions of the V and Cr (as well as VO2+ and Cr3+) in the dickite structure were probably contained in an original hydrothermal acid water. We suggest that hot hydrothermal waters leached the surrounding varieties of gabbroids enriched in V and Cr for the dickite-forming solution. The results of this work have shown V and Cr are potentially reliable indicators for geochemical characterization of the physicochemical conditions of their formation. The bulk-rock V/Cr ratio in hydrothermal dickites and kaolinites from Nowa Ruda, Sonoma (California, USA), Cigar Lake (Saskatchewan, Canada) and Teslić (Bosnia and Hercegovina) is also briefly explored here as a potential tracer of redox state during their formation

Chromate reduction in highly alkaline groundwater by zerovalent iron: Implications for its use in a permeable reactive barrier

It is not currently known if the widely used reaction of zerovalent iron (ZVI) and Cr(VI) can be used in a permeable reactive barrier (PRB) to immobilize Cr leaching from hyperalkaline chromite ore processing residue (COPR). This study compares Cr(VI) removal from COPR leachate and chromate solution by ZVI at high pH. Cr(VI) removal occurs more rapidly from the chromate solution than from COPR leachate. The reaction is first order with respect to both [Cr(VI)] and the iron surface area, but iron surface reactivity is lost to the reaction. Buffering pH downward produces little change in the removal rate or the specific capacity of iron until acidic conditions are reached. SEM and XPS analyses confirm that reaction products accumulate on the iron surface in both liquors, but that other surface precipitates also form in COPR leachate. Leachate from highly alkaline COPR contains Ca, Si, and Al that precipitate on the iron surface and significantly reduce the specific capacity of iron to reduce Cr(VI). This study suggests that, although Cr(VI) reduction by ZVI will occur at hyperalkaline pH, other solutes present in COPR leachate will limit the design life of a PRB