Comparison of clinical outcomes between total hip replacement and total knee replacement

Background: Total hip replacements (THR) and total knee replacements (TKR) are effective treatments for severe osteoarthritis (OA). Some studies suggest clinical outcomes following THR are superior to TKR, the reason for which remains unknown. This study compares clinical outcomes between THR and TKR.Aim: To compare the clinic outcomes of THR and TKR using a comprehensive range of patient reported outcome measures (PROMs).Methods: A prospective longitudinal observational study of patients with OA undergoing THR and TKR were evaluated using a comprehensive range of generic and joint specific PROMs pre- and post-operatively.Results: A total of 131 patients were included in the study which comprised the THR group (68 patients) and the TKR group (63 patients). Both groups demonstrated significant post-operative improvements in all PROM scores (P < 0.001). There were no significant differences in post-operative PROM scores between the two groups: Hip and Knee Osteoarthritis Outcome scores (P = 0.140), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index pain (P = 0.297) stiffness (P = 0.309) and function (P = 0.945), Oxford Hip and Knee Score (P = 0.076), EuroQol-5D index (P = 0.386) and Short-Form 12-item survey physical component score (P = 0.106). Subgroup analyses showed no significant difference (P > 0.05) between cruciate retaining and posterior stabilised prostheses in the TKR group and no significant difference (P > 0.05) between cemented and uncemented fixation in the THR group. Obese patients had poorer outcomes following TKR but did not significantly influence the outcome following THR.Conclusion: Contrary to some literature, THR and TKR are equally efficacious in alleviating the pain and disability of OA when assessed using a comprehensive range of PROMs. The varying knee prosthesis types and hip fixation techniques did not significantly influence clinical outcome. Obesity had a greater influence on the outcome following TKR than that of THR

Proprioception deficiency in articular cartilage lesions of the knee

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to investigate the proprioceptive function of patients with isolated articular cartilage lesions of the knee as compared to normal controls. Methods: The Cartilage group consisted of eight subjects with radiologically and arthroscopically confirmed, isolated, unilateral, articular cartilage lesions of the knee (Outerbridge grade III or IV). They were compared to 50 normal controls. Knee proprioception was assessed by dynamic postural stabilometry using the Biodex Balance SD System. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were used to evaluate all subjects. Results: Proprioception of the injured knee of the Cartilage group was significantly poorer compared to that of the control group (p < 0.001). A significant proprioceptive deficit also was observed when the uninjured knees of the Cartilage group were compared to those in the Control group (p = 0.003). There was no significant proprioceptive difference between the injured and the contra-lateral uninjured knee of the Cartilage group (p = 0.116). A significant correlation was found between the proprioception measurements of the injured and uninjured knee of the Cartilage group (r = 0.76, p = 0.030). A significant difference was observed in all PROMs (p < 0.001) between the Cartilage and Control groups. Conclusions: Patients with isolated articular cartilage lesions of the knee had a significant proprioceptive deficit as compared to normal controls. The deficiency was profound and even affected the proprioceptive function of the contra-lateral uninjured knee. This study has shown that articular cartilage lesions have a major influence on knee proprioception. However, it remains uncertain as to whether a proprioceptive deficit leads to osteoarthritis or is a consequence of it

Impact of age on clinical outcomes in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

\ua9 The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag France SAS, part of Springer Nature 2024.Background: Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is a common procedure for symptomatic ACL injuries. Age is often factored into clinical decision making and can influence the choice of conservative management over surgical intervention. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of chronological age on the clinical outcome following ACLR. Method: Six validated patient-reported outcome measures (PROM) were used to collect pre-operative and post-operative scores from patients with ACL rupture undergoing ACLR. Data were stratified pertaining to the patient’s age at the time of surgery to compare the Younger Group (under 40 years) with the Older Group (over 40 years). Results: A total of 45 patients were included in this study. Pre-operatively the Younger Group (n = 32) had significantly better Lysholm (p = 0.016), Tegner (p = 0.001), Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Activities of Daily Living (ADL) sub-score (p = 0.003) and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score (p = 0.014) as compared to the Older Group (n = 13). Post-operatively, there was no significant difference (p &gt; 0.05) between the two groups as all the PROM scores were comparable except for the Tegner score (p = 0.02), where younger patients had higher activity levels. Significant inverse correlations were only found between age and Tegner score (rho = − 0.58, p &lt; 0.001) and KOOS Sport and Recreation sub-score (rho = − 0.33, p = 0.038). Conclusion: ACLR is a clinically successful treatment strategy for patients of all ages. Thus, age should not be used in isolation to determine patient suitability