131 research outputs found
Five areas to advance branding theory and practice
The paper suggests five areas to advance branding theory and practice based on the authorsâ recent work in brand management.
In this commentary, we aim to put forward suggestions and ideas for further research in brand management; ideas, which we believe will have an impact on the way branding is researched and practiced by both academics and practitioners alike. We will focus on the future of branding in the following areas, inspired by our own work in the field: (1) branding in higher education, (2) branding in Asia Pacific, (3) brand ambidexterity, (4) brand innovation on social media, and (5) brand likeability
Modern Environmental Health Hazards: A Public Health Issue of Increasing Significance in Africa
Corporate Entrepreneurship:From Structures to Mindset
Corporate entrepreneurship dispersed throughout an organization and leveraging the entrepreneurial potential of all its employees bears significant benefits for those organizations that embrace it. However, it appears more difficult to instill and requires strong investment in the development of human capital and entrepreneurial mindset among the employees and across the organization. In this chapter, we discuss the essence of corporate entrepreneurship mindset and show that across an organization, there might be different entrepreneurial mindsets that correspond to different people, opportunities, and contexts. Although different, they all lead to enactment of entrepreneurial projects. This chapter, thus, contributes to the discussion regarding the nature of corporate entrepreneurial mindsets, and their development and stimulation within an organization, from both academic and practical view
PDK1-mTOR signaling pathway inhibitors reduce cell proliferation in MK2206 resistant neuroblastoma cells
Phenotypic effects of concomitant insensitive acetylcholinesterase (ace-1 R ) and knockdown resistance (kdr R ) in Anopheles gambiae: a hindrance for insecticide resistance management for malaria vector control
Does 'Best Practice' in Setting Executive Pay in the UK Encourage 'Good' Behaviour?
We examine how UK listed companies set executive pay, reviewing the implications
of following best practice in corporate governance and examining how this can
conflict with what shareholders and other stakeholders might perceive as good
behaviour. We do this by considering current governance regulation in the light
of interviews with protagonists in the debate, setting out the dilemmas faced by
remuneration-setters, and showing how the processes they follow can lead to
ethical conflicts. Current ?best? practice governing executive pay includes the
use of market benchmarks to determine salary and bonus levels, significant
levels of performance-related pay, the desire for executives to hold equity in
their companies, the disclosure of total shareholder return compared to an
index, and a perceived need for conformity, in order to grant legitimacy to
policies. Whilst each of these may in some circumstances lead to good practice,
each has the potential to cause dysfunctional behaviour in executives. Overall,
we conclude that although best practice might drive good executive behaviour
that coincides with the company?s and key stakeholders? objectives, there are
many reasons why it should not
- âŠ