10,434 research outputs found

    Calibration of Tests for Time Dilation in GRB Pulse Structures

    Get PDF
    Two tests for cosmological time dilation in γ\gamma-ray bursts -- the peak alignment and auto-correlation statistics -- involve averaging information near the times of peak intensity. Both tests require width corrections, assuming cosmological origin for bursts, since narrower temporal structure from higher energy would be redshifted into the band of observation, and since intervals between pulse structures are included in the averaging procedures. We analyze long (>> 2 s) BATSE bursts and estimate total width corrections for trial time-dilation factors (TDF = [1+zdimz_{\rm dim}]/[1+zbrtz_{\rm brt}]) by time-dilating and redshifting bright bursts. Both tests reveal significant trends of increasing TDF with decreasing peak flux, but neither provides sufficient discriminatory power to distinguish between actual TDFs in the range 2--3.Comment: 5 pages in LATeX, REVTEX style, 2 embedded figures. To appear in Third Huntsville GRB Workshop Proceeding

    Test for Time Dilation of Intervals Between Pulse Structures in GRBs

    Get PDF
    If γ\gamma-ray bursts are at cosmological distances, then not only their constituent pulses but also the intervals between pulses should be time-dilated. Unlike time-dilation measures of pulse emission, intervals would appear to require negligible correction for redshift of narrower temporal structure from higher energy into the band of observation. However, stretching of pulse intervals is inherently difficult to measure without incurring a timescale-dependent bias since, as time profiles are stretched, more structure can appear near the limit of resolution. This problem is compounded in dimmer bursts because identification of significant structures becomes more problematic. We attempt to minimize brightness bias by equalizing signal-to-noise (s/n) level of all bursts. We analyze wavelet-denoised burst profiles binned to several resolutions, identifying significant fluctuations between pulse structures and interjacent valleys. When bursts are ranked by peak flux, an interval time-dilation signature is evident, but its magnitude and significance are dependent upon temporal resolution and s/n level.Comment: 5 pages in LATeX, REVTEX style, 2 embedded figures. To appear in Third Huntsville GRB Workshop Proceeding

    Constraints on Association of Single-pulse Gamma-ray Bursts and Supernovae

    Get PDF
    We explore the hypothesis, similar to one recently suggested by Bloom and colleagues, that some nearby supernovae are associated with smooth, single-pulse gamma-ray bursts, possibly having no emission above ~ 300 keV. We examine BATSE bursts with durations longer than 2 s, fitting those which can be visually characterized as single-pulse events with a lognormal pulse model. The fraction of events that can be reliably ascertained to be temporally and spectrally similar to the exemplar, GRB 980425 - possibly associated with SN 1998bw - is 4/1573 or 0.25%. This fraction could be as high as 8/1573 (0.5%) if the dimmest bursts are included. Approximately 2% of bursts are morphologically similar to GRB 980425 but have emission above ~ 300 keV. A search of supernova catalogs containing 630 detections during BATSE's lifetime reveals only one burst (GRB 980425) within a 3-month time window and within the total 3-sigma BATSE error radius that could be associated with a type Ib/c supernova. There is no tendency for any subset of single-pulse GRBs to fall near the Supergalactic Plane, whereas SNe of type Ib/c do show this tendency. Economy of hypotheses leads us to conclude that nearby supernovae generally are not related to smooth, single-pulse gamma-ray bursts.Comment: 25 pages, 5 figure

    The Deep Diffuse Extragalactic Radio Sky at 1.75 GHz

    Full text link
    We present a study of diffuse extragalactic radio emission at 1.75 1.75\,GHz from part of the ELAIS-S1 field using the Australia Telescope Compact Array. The resulting mosaic is 2.46 2.46\,deg2^2, with a roughly constant noise region of 0.61 0.61\,deg2^2 used for analysis. The image has a beam size of 150×60 150 \times60\,arcsec and instrumental ⟨σn⟩=(52±5) μ\langle\sigma_{\rm n}\rangle= (52\pm5)\, \muJy beam−1^{-1}. Using point-source models from the ATLAS survey, we subtract the discrete emission in this field for S≥150 μS \ge 150\, \muJy beam−1^{-1}. Comparison of the source-subtracted probability distribution, or \pd, with the predicted distribution from unsubtracted discrete emission and noise, yields an excess of (76±23) μ(76 \pm 23) \, \muJy beam−1^{-1}. Taking this as an upper limit on any extended emission we constrain several models of extended source counts, assuming Ωsource≤2 \Omega_{\rm source} \le 2\,arcmin. The best-fitting models yield temperatures of the radio background from extended emission of Tb=(10±7) T_{\rm b}=(10\pm7) \,mK, giving an upper limit on the total temperature at 1.75 1.75\,GHz of (73±10) (73\pm10)\,mK. Further modelling shows that our data are inconsistent with the reported excess temperature of ARCADE2 to a source-count limit of 1 μ1\, \muJy. Our new data close a loop-hole in the previous constraints, because of the possibility of extended emission being resolved out at higher resolution. Additionally, we look at a model of cluster halo emission and two WIMP dark matter annihilation source-count models, and discuss general constraints on any predicted counts from such sources. Finally, we report the derived integral count at 1.4 1.4\,GHz using the deepest discrete count plus our new extended-emission limits, providing numbers that can be used for planning future ultra-deep surveys.Comment: 18 pages, 15 figures, 7 tables, Accepted by MNRA

    Lunar nitrogen: Secular variation or mixing?

    Get PDF
    The two current models to explain the nearly 40% variation of the lunar nitrogen isotopic composition are: (1) secular variation of solar wind nitrogen; and (2) a two component mixing model having a constant, heavy solar wind admixed with varying amounts of indigenous light lunar N (LLN). Both models are needed to explain the step pyrolysis extraction profile. The secular variation model proposes that the low temperature release is modern day solar wind implanted into grain surfaces, the 900 C to 1100 C release is from grain surfaces which were once exposed to the ancient solar wind but which are now trapped inside agglutinates, and the >1100 C release as spallogenic N produced by cosmic rays. The mixing model ascribes the components to solar wind, indigenous lunar N and spallogenic N respectively. An extension of either interpretation is that the light N seen in lunar breccias or deep drill cores represent conditions when more N-14 was available to the lunar surface
    • …
    corecore