Changes in the quality of diabetes care in Japan between 2007 and 2015: A repeated cross-sectional study using claims data

AimTo assess the temporal changes in the quality indicators pertaining to the process measures of diabetes care during a recent decade in Japan.MethodsA five-fold repeated cross-sectional study was conducted using health insurance claims data provided by the Japan Medical Data Center between April 2006 and March 2016. We identified 46,631 outpatients with antidiabetic medication who regularly visited hospitals or clinics at least every three months. We evaluated the quality indicators pertaining to glycemic control monitoring, lipid profile monitoring, retinopathy screening, nephropathy screening, and appropriate medication choice. The proportions of patients who received appropriate examinations/prescriptions, by observation period and either the type of antidiabetic medication or facility type were estimated using generalized estimating equation (GEE) models with multiple covariate adjustments.ResultsThe quality indicator values for appropriate medication choice and nephropathy screening improved between 2007 and 2015, whereas those for glycemic control monitoring and retinopathy screening remained suboptimal. Patients prescribed medications in larger hospitals were likelier to undergo the recommended examinations (e.g. retinopathy screening: 36.1% (95% CI: 35.4–36.7%) for clinic, 40.6% (95% CI: 39.1–42.2%) for smaller hospital, and 46.0% (95% CI: 44.8–47.2%) for larger hospital in 2015).ConclusionsSeveral process measures of diabetes care remained suboptimal in Japan

Contribution of Diabetes to the Incidence and Prevalence of Comorbid Conditions (Cancer, Periodontal Disease, Fracture, Impaired Cognitive Function, and Depression): A Systematic Review of Epidemiological Studies in Japanese Populations

Background: Several epidemiological studies have determined the relationship between diabetes and the incidence and/or prevalence of recently identified comorbid conditions (cancer, periodontal disease, fracture, cognitive impairment, and depression). These relationships may vary by country or race/ethnicity. We aimed to systematically review studies in this field conducted with the Japanese population because such a review in the Japanese population has never been undertaken. Methods: We conducted systematic literature searches in PubMed and Ichushi-Web databases for studies published until December 2016. Studies comparing the incidence and/or prevalence of the comorbidities among the Japanese population were included. The studies were classified as integrated analyses, cohort studies, case-control studies, or cross-sectional studies. Results: We identified 33 studies (cancer: 17, periodontal disease: 5, fracture: 5, cognitive impairment: 4, and depression: 2). Although several cohort studies and meta-analyses had assessed the development of cancer in diabetes, there was scant epidemiological evidence for the other conditions. Indeed, only one cohort study each had been conducted for periodontal disease, fracture, and cognitive impairment, whereas other evidence was cross-sectional, some of which was induced from baseline characteristic tables of studies designed for other purposes. Conclusion: In Japan, there is insufficient evidence about the relationship between diabetes and the incidence/prevalence of periodontal disease, fracture, cognitive impairment, and depression. By contrast, several cohort studies and integrated analyses have been conducted for the relationship with cancer. Further studies should be undertaken to estimate the contribution of diabetes on the incidence/prevalence of comorbidities that may be specific to the Japanese population

Additional file 8: Figure S7. of Construction of a simulation model and evaluation of the effect of potential interventions on the incidence of diabetes and initiation of dialysis due to diabetic nephropathy in Japan

Sensitivity analysis after incorporating changes in diabetes incidence rates and dialysis initiation rates – from constant to allowing exponential change. a) Total population with diabetes. b) Total population on dialysis due to diabetic nephropathy. (TIFF 28569 kb

Additional file 3: Table S1. of Construction of a simulation model and evaluation of the effect of potential interventions on the incidence of diabetes and initiation of dialysis due to diabetic nephropathy in Japan

Calibrated incidence rates of diabetes and dialysis initiation due to diabetic nephropathy. (DOCX 11 kb

Patient referral flow between physician and ophthalmologist visits for diabetic retinopathy screening among Japanese patients with diabetes: A retrospective cross‐sectional cohort study using the National Database

Abstract Aims/Introduction Regular screening for diabetic retinopathy is essential. This study aimed to show the process and current situation of diabetic retinopathy screening prescribed by physicians (internists) and ophthalmologists for Japanese patients with diabetes. Materials and Methods This retrospective cohort study used data from the Japanese National Database of Insurance Claims between April 2016 and March 2018. Ophthalmology visits and fundus examinations are defined using specific medical procedure codes. The proportion of ophthalmology visits for patients with diabetic medication and for fundus examination among those who visited ophthalmologists was calculated in the fiscal year 2017. A modified Poisson regression analysis was carried out to identify factors associated with retinopathy screening. Similarly, quality indicators by prefectures were also calculated. Results Among 4,408,585 patients receiving diabetic medications (57.8% men, 14.1% insulin use), 47.4% visited the ophthalmology department and 96.9% of those underwent fundus examination. Regression analysis showed that female sex, older age, insulin use, medical facilities with Japan Diabetes Society certification and large medical facilities were predictors of fundus examination. By prefecture, the ophthalmology consultation rate and the fundus examination ranged 38.5–51.0% and 92.1–98.7%, respectively. Conclusions Less than half of the patients who were prescribed antidiabetic medication by their physicians visited an ophthalmologist. However, most of the patients who visited an ophthalmologist had a fundus examination carried out. A similar tendency was noted for each prefecture. It is essential to reaffirm the necessity of recommending ophthalmologic examinations to physicians and healthcare professionals who care for patients with diabetes

Effect of body mass index and intra-abdominal fat measured by computed tomography on the risk of bowel symptoms.

This study aims to investigate the association between body mass index (BMI) or intra-abdominal fat measured by computed tomography (CT) and bowel symptoms.A cohort of 958 Japanese adults who underwent colonoscopy and CT and completed questionnaires after excluding colorectal diseases was analyzed. Six symptoms (constipation, diarrhea, loose stools, hard stools, fecal urgency, and incomplete evacuation) using a 7-point Likert scale were evaluated between baseline and second questionnaire for test-retest reliability. Associations between BMI, visceral adipose tissue (VAT), subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT), and symptom score were analyzed by a rank-ordered logistic model, adjusting for age, sex, smoking, and alcohol consumption, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and dyslipidemia.Some bowel symptom scores were significantly (p<0.05) different between the age groups, sexes, smoking, and alcohol consumption. In multivariate analysis, constipation was associated with low BMI (p<0.01), low VAT area (p = 0.01), and low SAT area (p<0.01). Moreover, hard stools was associated with low BMI (p<0.01) and low SAT area (p<0.01). The remaining symptoms were not significantly associated with BMI or intra-abdominal fat. Test-retest reliability of bowel symptom scores with a mean duration of 7.5 months was good (mean kappa, 0.672).Both low BMI and low abdominal fat accumulation appears to be useful indicators of increased risk for constipation and hard stools. The long-term test-retest reliability of symptom score suggests that bowel symptoms relevant to BMI or visceral fat remain consistent over several months