21 research outputs found

    Treatment Modalities and Survival in Older Adults with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer in Real Life

    No full text
    OBJECTIVES: Metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is increasingly treated with targeted therapies, but little is known about real-life mCRC treatment in older adults. The aims were to describe the real-life first-line treatment modalities in older adult mCRC patients, to identify factors associated with treatment modalities, and to evaluate survival with regard to treatment modalities. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A cohort of mCRC patients aged 65 years and older at diagnosis was identified between 2009 and 2013 using French national healthcare insurance system claims data. Treatment modalities were: treatment with one or more anticancer medication vs best supportive care and, among treated patients, treatment with targeted therapy vs conventional chemotherapy alone. Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with treatment by anticancer medication and by targeted therapy. Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess the independent effect of treatment modalities on overall survival while adjusting for baseline covariates identified with logistic regression. RESULTS: A total of 503 patients were included with a median age of 78 years (54% were men). Of these, 299 (59%) were treated with anticancer medications. Among treated patients, 131 (44%) received targeted therapy. In multivariate analysis, age 75 years or older, renal failure, malnutrition, and five or more concomitant medications were associated with a lower likelihood of treatment with anticancer medications. Among treated patients, age 75 years or older, history of cancer, lymph node metastases, and a single metastatic site were associated with a lower likelihood of treatment with targeted therapy. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards models found that treatment with any anticancer medication tended to be associated with a lower risk of death; treatment with targeted therapy was not significantly associated. CONCLUSION: A more appropriate prescription of anticancer medications in the older adult will require the definition of more explicit criteria to avoid undertreatment. The real benefit of targeted therapies vs conventional chemotherapy alone needs to be confirmed in this population

    J Antimicrob Chemother

    No full text
    Background: Carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (CRPA) strains are involved in severe infections, mostly in ICUs. Exposure to antibiotics other than carbapenems may be associated with isolation of CRPA; therefore, we aimed to identify those antibiotics using the case-case-control study design. Methods: A case-case-control study was conducted in 2015 in a prospective multicentre cohort that included 1808 adults hospitalized in 2009 in 10 French ICUs. Patients were screened for P. aeruginosa at admission to the ICU and then weekly. Cases were patients with CRPA and patients with carbapenem-susceptible P. aeruginosa (CSPA) isolation. Controls were patients without P. aeruginosa isolation, matched with each case according to centre, length of stay and hospitalization period. Effects of antibiotic exposure were explored, after adjusting for prior treatment with carbapenems and confounding factors comprising colonization pressure with two logistic regression models. The two models were compared to identify specific risk factors for CRPA isolation. Results: Fifty-nine CRPA, 83 CSPA and 142 controls were compared. In adjusted multivariable analyses, exposure to carbapenems and to antibiotics belonging to the group of beta-lactams inactive against P. aeruginosa were independent risk factors for CRPA isolation (OR, 1.205; 95% CI, 1.079-1.346 and OR, 1.101; 95% CI, 1.010-1.201, respectively). Conversely, exposure to beta-lactams active against P. aeruginosa was an independent protective factor for CSPA isolation (OR, 0.868; 95% CI, 0.772-0.976). Conclusions: Besides carbapenem exposure, exposure to beta-lactams inactive against P. aeruginosa was a specific risk factor for CRPA isolation. Clinicians should counterweigh the potential benefits of administering these antibiotics against the increased risk of CRPA infection

    Therapie

    No full text
    AIM OF THE STUDY: To provide a tool for drug misuse or potential misuse monitoring by using a healthcare insurance database. METHODS: A cross-sectional study repeated quarterly from 2007 to 2014 was conducted using data from a 1/97th random sample of the French national healthcare reimbursement system. For each drug studied, ad hoc indicators were designed to assess drug misuse, defined as prescriptions that did not comply with the label stipulated in the summary of product characteristics, in terms of the drug (e.g., interactions) or the patient (age, medical history). We focused on specifically identified situations of drug misuse involving non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), antiemetics in patients with Parkinson's disease and antipsychotics in pediatrics; we also focused on direct anticoagulants, asthma and oral antidiabetic drugs but results for these latter are only shown in supplementary materials. RESULTS: At-risk prescribing of NSAIDs in patients treated by diuretics or renin-angiotensin system inhibitors always remained higher than 14% over the study (maximum: 19%; 2014 quarter 4: 15.4%). Off-label prescribing of contraindicated anti-dopaminergic antiemetics with dopaminergic antiparkinson drugs was marginal (maximum: 2.2%; 2014 quarter 4: 0.5%) but represented at least 5.5% of antiemetic prescriptions. Despite the rise in antipsychotic prescriptions in pediatrics, no dramatic increase in misuse related to age was observed during the study period (2007 quarter 1: 16.1%; 2014 quarter 4: 11.1%). The highest degree of misuse was observed for aripiprazole and for second-generation antipsychotics other than risperidone and aripiprazole. CONCLUSION: This study provides a simple tool to monitor drug misuse or potential misuse using information from a health insurance database. The results highlight the need for the Regulator to rethink risk management information campaigns and to modify the official information on products
    corecore