Iohexol Clearance for Determination of Glomerular Filtration Rate in Rats Induced to Acute Renal Failure

IntroductionThe glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is considered an especially important tool for the measurement of renal function. Inulin clearance (InCl) is the classic reference method for this purpose, although it is associated with a number of disadvantages; thus, other markers have been proposed, including iohexol. Determination of iohexol clearance (IoCl) has been established for clinical use; however, its application as a GFR marker in experimental rat models has not been reported.ObjectivesThis study aims to standardize a methodology for the measurement of iohexol clearance and to evaluate its applicability as a marker of GFR in rats with induced toxic acute renal failure (ARF), using InCl as the gold standard.Materials and MethodsTwenty-six Wistar male rats (200-300 g) were divided into the following two groups: a control group (n=7) and an ARF group (n=19). ARF was induced by the subcutaneous administration of cisplatin (5 mg/kg); IoCl and InCl were determined simultaneously, and plasma creatinine (pCreat) dosage was measured colorimetrically.ResultsThe pCreat, InCl and IoCl levels were consistent with the expected values for the renal function ranges of the evaluated animals, and the IoCl and InCl levels were significantly correlated (r=0.792). An inverse moderate linear correlation between the IoCl and pCreat measurements (r=-0.587) and between the InCl and pCreat measurements (r=-0.722) were observed.ConclusionThese results confirm a correlation between IoCl and the gold standard of GFR, InCl measurement. IoCl offers a relevant advantage over InCl because determination of the former allows the animal to live after the procedure.Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)Universidade Federal de São Paulo, Dept Med, Div Nephrol, São Paulo, SP, BrazilUniv São Paulo, Inst Biomed Sci, Dept Immunol, São Paulo, SP, BrazilUniv São Paulo, Sch Med, Dept Nephrol, São Paulo, SP, BrazilUniversidade Federal de São Paulo, Dept Med, Div Nephrol, São Paulo, SP, BrazilWeb of Scienc

Urinary protein/creatinine ratio versus 24-hour proteinuria in the evaluation of lupus nephritis

INTRODUCTION: The urinary protein/creatinine ratio has been used instead of 24-hour proteinuria in Nephrology practice for the follow-up of glomerular diseases, considering the advantages of collection and the low cost. However, there are still doubts as to its applicability both for an isolated evaluation and for the follow-up of patients with lupus nephritis. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate 24-hour proteinuria determinations and random urine samples, performing urinary creatinine correction and urinary protein/creatinine ratio in subjects with lupus nephritis. METHODS: 24-hour proteinuria and urinary protein/creatinine ratio were determined by conventional methods (automated Pyrogallol for proteinuria and alkaline picrate for creatinine). RESULTS: Seventy-eight urine samples of 41 patients diagnosed with systemic lupus erythematosus, according to the American Rheumatology Association, with lupus nephritis, were analyzed, and a good correlation between 24-hour proteinuria and urinary protein/creatinine ratio (r = 0.9010 and r² = 0.813) was observed. However, a poor correlation between random proteinuria (without creatinine correction) versus 24-hour proteinuria (r = 0.635 and r² = 0.403) or versus urinary protein/creatinine ratio (r = 0.754 and r² = 0.569) was seen. CONCLUSION: 24-hour proteinuria and urinary protein/creatinine ratio were useful in the follow-up of each case. However, we observed that the absolute values were different, which did not allow the replacement of one for the other during follow-up, especially when this result is used to define the activity of the disease. Based on these results, we suggest a period of intersection from one to the other (two to three determinations by both methods), and the choice of one marker for proteinuria follow-up, if necessary.INTRODUÇÃO: Tem-se defendido a utilização do índice urinário proteína e creatinina em substituição à determinação de proteinúria de 24 horas para acompanhamento de doenças glomerulares, considerando-se as vantagens de maior facilidade na coleta e o menor custo. Entretanto, há dúvidas quanto à pertinência de usar este índice tanto numa avaliação isolada como no seguimento de pacientes com nefrite lúpica. OBJETIVO: Avaliar as determinações de proteinúria de 24 horas e proteinúria em amostra isolada de urina, fazendo a correção pela creatinina urinária, relação proteinúria/creatininúria, em indivíduos com nefrite lúpica. MÉTODOS: Determinações de proteinúria de 24 horas e relação proteinúria/creatininúria por métodos convencionais (Pirogalol automatizado para proteinúria e picrato alcalino para creatinina). RESULTADOS: Foram comparadas 78 amostras de urina de 41 pacientes com diagnóstico de lúpus eritematoso sistêmico, segundo os critérios da Associação Americana de Reumatologia, com nefrite lúpica, constatando-se uma boa correlação entre proteinúria de 24 horas e relação proteinúria/creatininúria (r = 0,9010 e r² = 0,813). Não se observou, entretanto, uma boa correlação entre proteinúria em amostra isolada (sem correção pela creatinina urinária) versus aquela de 24 horas (r = 0,635 e r² = 0,403) ou versus relação proteinúria/creatininúria (r = 0,754 e r² = 0,569). CONCLUSÃO: Os marcadores de proteinúria de 24 horas e relação proteinúria/creatininúria isoladamente mostraram-se úteis no acompanhamento de cada caso. Porém, observou-se que os seus valores absolutos são diferentes, não possibilitando a substituição de um pelo outro ao longo do seguimento, particularmente quando este resultado é usado para definição de atividade da doença. Se necessário, sugere-se um período de intersecção (duas a três determinações pelos dois métodos) para mudança de um para outro e escolha de um único marcador preferencial para seguimento da proteinúria.Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP) Setor de GlomerulopatiasHospital do Rim Laboratório CentralUNIFESP Setor de Glomerulopatias Laboratório de Glomerulopatias e Imunopatologia RenalUNIFESP, Setor de GlomerulopatiasUNIFESP, Setor de Glomerulopatias Laboratório de Glomerulopatias e Imunopatologia RenalSciEL

Detection of podocyturia in patients with lupus nephritis

INTRODUCTION: The podocyturia has been detected in glomerular diseases, such as lupus nephritis (LN), in which proteinuria is an important manifestation, and its occurrence seems to be limited to the active phase of the disease. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate podocyturia in LN patients, and the possible association with clinical disease activity. METHODS: We evaluated 56 patients with LN, that were classified in three groups according to the degree of clinical activity: Group B, no activity (n = 17), Group C with mild (n = 29) and Group D, moderate to severe activity (n = 10). The control group was composed by 29 healthy subjects (Group A). The podocyturia was studied by indirect immunofluorescence using primary antibodies to podocyte: anti-podocin, nephrin and synaptopodin, and a secondary antibody conjugated with FITC. We also evaluated serum creatinine levels, urinary protein/creatinine (P/C) ratio, hematuria and leucocituria. RESULTS: The podocyturia with anti-podocin and anti-sinaptopodin correlated statistically with the P/C ratio (p = 0.001 and p = 0.013, respectively). The podocyturia with anti-podocin, as well as the P/C ratio showed significant correlation (p < 0.001) with the degree of lupus disease activity, unlike the other two antibodies, anti-nephrin and anti-synaptopodin. CONCLUSION: Our findings show that podocyturia with anti-podocin could be useful in monitoring disease activity in LN patients.INTRODUÇÃO: A podocitúria tem sido detectada em doenças glomerulares, tais como em nefrite lúpica (NL), em que a proteinúria é uma manifestação importante, e sua ocorrência parece limitar-se à fase ativa da doença. OBJETIVO: Avaliar a podocitúria por imunofluorescência em pacientes portadores de NL e verificar possível associação com atividade clínica da doença. MÉTODOS: Foram avaliados 56 pacientes com NL. Os pacientes foram divididos em três grupos de acordo com o grau de atividade clínica: Grupo B, sem atividade (n = 17); Grupo C, com atividade discreta (n = 29) e Grupo D, moderada a grave (n = 10). Como grupo controle, foram incluídos 29 indivíduos saudáveis (Grupo A). A podocitúria foi estudada por meio de imunofluorescência indireta, usando-se anticorpos primários antipodocina, nefrina e sinaptopodina, e anticorpo secundário conjugado à FITC. Também foram avaliados os níveis de creatinina sérica e da relação proteína/creatinina (P/C) urinária, assim como a presença de hematúria e leucocitúria. RESULTADOS: A podocitúria com antipodocina e com antissinaptopodina correlacionou-se estatisticamente com a relação P/C (p = 0,001 e p = 0,013, respectivamente). Tanto a podocitúria com antipodocina, quanto a relação P/C, apresentaram correlação significante (p < 0,001) com a graduação de atividade da doença na NL, diferentemente do que se observou com os outros dois anticorpos, antinefrina e antissinaptopodina. CONCLUSÃO: Nossos achados sugerem que a pesquisa de podocitúria com anticorpos antipodocina poderia ser útil no acompanhamento de pacientes com NL, fornecendo dados relevantes quanto à atividade da doença.Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)UNIFESPSciEL

Estimation of glomerular filtration rate from serum creatinine and cystatin C in octogenarians and nonagenarians

Background: Equations to estimate GFR have not been well validated in the elderly and may misclassify persons with chronic kidney disease (CKD). We measured GFR and compared the performance of the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD), the Chronic Kidney Disease-Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-Epi) and the Berlin Initiative Study (BIS) equations based on creatinine and/or cystatin C in octogenarians and nonagenarians.Methods: Using cross-sectional analysis we assessed 95 very elderly persons (mean 85 years) living in the community. GFR was measured by iohexol (mGFR) and compared with estimates using six equations: MDRD, CKD-Epi_creatinine, CKD-Epi_cystatin, CKD-Epi_creatinine-cystatin, BIS_creatinine and BIS_creatinine-cystatin.Results: Mean mGFR was 55 (range, 19-86) ml/min/1.73 m(2). Bias was smaller with the CKD-Epi_creatinine-cystatin and the CKD-Epi_creatinine equations (-4.0 and 1.7 ml/min/1.73 m2). Accuracy (percentage of estimates within 30% of mGFR) was greater with the CKD-Epi_creatinine-cystatin, BIS_creatinine-cystatin and BIS_creatinine equations (85%, 83% and 80%, respectively). Among the creatinine-based equations, the BIS_creatinine had the greatest accuracy at mGFR < 60 ml/min/1.73 m(2) and the CKD-Epi_creatinine was superior at higher GFRs (79% and 90%, respectively). the CKD-Epi_creatinine-cystatin, BIS_creatinine-cystatin and CKD-Epi_cystatin equations yielded the greatest areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve at GFR threshold = 60 ml/min/1.73 m(2) (0.88, 0.88 and 0.87, respectively). in participants classified based on the BIS_creatinine, CKD-Epi_cystatin, or BIS_creatinine-cystatin equations, the CKD-Epi_creatinine-cystatin equation tended to improve CKD classification (net reclassification index: 12.7%, p = 0.18; 6.7%, p = 0.38; and 15.9%; p = 0.08, respectively).Conclusions: GFR-estimating equations CKD-Epi_creatinine-cystatin and BIS_creatinine-cystatin showed better accuracy than other equations using creatinine or cystatin C alone in very elderly persons. the CKD-Epi_creatinine-cystatin equation appears to be advantageous in CKD classification. If cystatin C is not available, both the BIS_cr equation and the CKD-Epi_cr equation could be used, although at mGFR < 60 ml/min/1.73 m(2), the BIS_cr equation seems to be the best alternative.Brazilian Research CouncilUniversidade Federal de São Paulo, Sch Med, São Paulo, BrazilUniversidade Federal de São Paulo, Paulista Sch Med, Geriatr Div, BR-04023900 São Paulo, BrazilUniversidade Federal de São Paulo, Sch Med, São Paulo, BrazilUniversidade Federal de São Paulo, Paulista Sch Med, Geriatr Div, BR-04023900 São Paulo, BrazilBrazilian Research Council: 472115/2010-3Web of Scienc

Cistatina C sérica: uma alternativa prática para avaliação de função renal?

A taxa de filtração glomerular é o principal indicador de função renal em indivíduos saudáveis e doentes. Apesar de todo o desenvolvimento da medicina em nossos dias, ainda há dificuldade para definir-se essa taxa com precisão na prática diária. Marcadores precoces de lesão renal são importantes, porque a taxa de filtração glomerular se reduz antes do aparecimento dos sintomas ou sinais de insuficiência renal. A cistatina C tem sido apontada como uma alternativa, mas ainda não foi testada em muitas condições. Vantagens e desvantagens desse marcador foram aqui discutidas. Embora a determinação sérica da cistatina C comece a ser usada na prática clínica em todo o mundo, ainda não foram completamente esclarecidas suas limitações ou as situações em que está de fato indicada sua aplicação; por outro lado, a creatinina sérica (e sua depuração) é um marcador laboratorial facilmente acessível, de baixo custo, cujas limitações são bem conhecidas, que pode ser usado de forma rotineira para avaliação de função renal

Are serum cystatin C levels influenced by steroid doses in lupus nephritis patients?

INTRODUCTION: Cystatin C is considered a promising test to evaluate glomerular filtration rate, since it has characteristics of an ideal endogenous marker, being similar or even superior to serum creatinine according to some studies. However, it is possible that some factors (as corticotherapy) could have an influence on serum cystatin C levels regardless of the glomerular filtration rate. The aim of this study was to investigate if different doses of glucocorticoid could have an influence on serum cystatin C levels in lupus nephritis patients. METHODS: We evaluated 42 patients with lupus nephritis that performed 109 different blood collections; their mean age was 37.7 ± 13.1 years old, and 88% were female; the mean estimated glomerular filtration rate was of 61.9 ± 20.0 mL/min. Patients were divided according to their glucocorticoid dose in two groups: A - high (pulse therapy with methylprednisolone and prednisone > 0.5 mg/kg/d, n = 14) versus B - low doses (prednisone ≤ 0.5 mg/kg/d, n = 28). Serum creatinine levels were used as parameters for renal function comparison. Cystatin C was determined by an in-house methodology, using Luminex system flow citometry. RESULTS: Considering these groups, cystatin C levels were different only in the second visit (p = 0.106). But, when the serum creatinine levels were considered in the same groups, a marginally significant difference among them (p = 0.070) was observed, which suggested that the difference in cystatin C levels between the groups was caused by their respective glomerular filtration rate. There was not any difference between those groups that received or did not receive pulse therapy. CONCLUSION: Although some previous studies have shown that glucocorticoid has an influence on serum cystatin C levels, we have not observed such interference in the lupus nephritis patients submitted to corticotherapy

CLINICAL UTILITY OF A 22-KDA GROWTH HORMONE-SPECIFIC ASSAY

Human growth hormone (hGH) circulates in different molecular forms, with the 22-kDa monomer being the predominant one and the 20-kDa variant corresponding to 5 to 15% of the serum hGH on a weight basis. Using monoclonal antibodies with different specificities we developed two immunoenzymometric assays, one with 22 + 20-kDa specificity and the other specific only for the 22-kDa form. Both assays used microtiter plates as solid phase and streptavidin-peroxidase for color development; intra-assay CV was less than 10% in the range of 1 to 100 mIU/l for the 22 + 20-kDa assay and in the range of 3 to 100 for the 22-kDa assay, with an inter-assay CV of less than 14% for both assays; sensitivity was 0.2 mIU/l for the 22 + 20-kDa assay and 0.5 mIU/l for the 22-kDa assay. The two assays were compared by measuring 200 serum samples with detectable hGH levels by both assays. Higher values were obtained with the 22 + 20-kDa assay (62.1 +/- 5.9 vs 59.2 +/- 6.1 mIU/l, mean +/- SD) with a correlation coefficient (r) of 0.99. In no clinical condition (28 patients with growth retardation and 14 acromegalics) did the two assays give discrepant values. We conclude that there was no practical advantage in using an assay with specificity restricted to the 22-kDa form for measuring hGH in clinical serum samples.ESCOLA PAULISTA MED SCH,DEPT MED,DISCIPLINA ENDOCRINOL,CAIXA POSTAL 20266,BR-04034 SAO PAULO,BRAZILESCOLA PAULISTA MED SCH,DEPT MED,DISCIPLINA ENDOCRINOL,CAIXA POSTAL 20266,BR-04034 SAO PAULO,BRAZILWeb of Scienc

SPECIFIC AND NONSPECIFIC ASPECTS OF HUMORAL IMMUNE-RESPONSE IN LEPROSY

1. We have studied some generic and specific aspects of the humoral immune response in 96 patients with leprosy (29 paucibacillary and 67 multibacillary individuals). We determined serum immunoglobulins (IgM, IgG and IgA), CH50, Clq, C3 and C4, circulating immune complexes (CIC), C-reactive protein (CRP), rheumatoid factor (RF) and antinuclear antibodies. No specific pattern of general humoral immune changes could be observed.2. The specific immune response was studied by the detection of specific IgM anti-M. leprae antibodies. An immunoradiometric assay (IRMA) and an ELISA were compared for clinical effectiveness. IRMA showed greater sensitivity for the serodiagnosis of leprosy as compared to ELISA (88.1% vs 58.2% for multibacillary patients and 20.7% vs 10.3% for paucibacillary leprosy patients). Specificity was 96% for IRMA and 97% for ELISA.3. Our results indicate that nonspecific changes in the humoral immune response are of little value in assessing leprosy patients and that immune assays for the detection of specific anti-M. leprae antibodies may be of value in the diagnosis, study and follow-up of these patients.UNIV SAO PAULO,FAC SAUDE PUBL,BR-05508900 SAO PAULO,SP,BRAZILWeb of Scienc