The impact of perceived everyday discrimination and income on racial and ethnic disparities in PTSD, depression, and anxiety among veterans.

ObjectivesBlack and Hispanic/Latinx individuals experience a greater burden of mental health symptoms as compared to White individuals in the general population. Examination of ethnoracial disparities and mechanisms explaining these disparities among veterans is still in its nascence. The current study examined perceived everyday discrimination and income as parallel mediators of the association between race/ethnicity and PTSD, depression, and general anxiety symptoms in a sample of White, Black, and Hispanic/Latinx veterans stratified by gender.MethodsA random sample of 3,060 veterans living across the U.S. (oversampled for veterans living in high crime communities) completed a mail-based survey. Veterans completed self-report measures of perceived discrimination via the Everyday Discrimination Scale, PTSD symptoms via the Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist-5, depressive symptoms via the Patient Health Questionnaire, and anxiety symptoms via the Generalized Anxiety Disorder Questionnaire.ResultsModels comparing Black vs. White veterans found that the significant effect of race on PTSD, depression, and anxiety symptoms was mediated by both perceived discrimination and income for both male and female veterans. Results were less consistent in models comparing Hispanic/Latinx vs. White veterans. Income, but not perceived discrimination, mediated the relationship between ethnicity/race and depression and anxiety symptoms, but only among women.ConclusionsResults suggest that discrimination and socioeconomic status are important mechanisms through which marginalized social status negatively impacts mental health

Supporting the implementation of written exposure therapy for posttraumatic stress disorder in an obstetrics-substance use disorder clinic in the Northeastern United States

Pregnant people with comorbid posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and substance use disorder (SUD) constitute a highly vulnerable population. PTSD and SUD confer risks to both the pregnant person and the fetus, including a host of physical and mental health consequences. When PTSD and SUD co-occur, potential negative impacts are amplified, and the symptoms of each may exacerbate and maintain the other. Pregnancy often increases engagement in the healthcare system, presenting a unique and critical opportunity to provide PTSD and SUD treatment to birthing people motivated to mitigate risks of losing custody of their children. This paper presents implementation process outcomes of Written Exposure Therapy (WET), a brief, scalable, and sustainable evidence-based PTSD treatment delivered to pregnant persons receiving care in an integrated obstetrical-addiction recovery program at Boston Medical Center. Trial participants (N = 18) were mostly White, non-Hispanic (61.1%), not currently working (77.8%), had a high school or lower level of education (55.5%), had an annual household income less than $35,000 (94.4%), and were living in a substance use residential program (55.6%). We examined intervention feasibility, acceptability, appropriateness, adoption; barriers and facilitators to implementation; and feedback on supporting uptake and sustainability of the intervention using coded qualitative sources (consultation field notes [N = 47] and semi-structured interviews [N = 5]) from providers involved in trial planning and treatment delivery. Results reflected high acceptability, appropriateness, and adoption of WET. Participants described system-, provider-, and patient-level barriers to implementation, offered suggestions to enhance uptake, but did not raise concerns about core components of the intervention. Findings suggest that WET is an appropriate and acceptable PTSD treatment for this difficult-to-reach, complex population, and has the potential to positively impact pregnant persons and their children

Bootstrap confidence intervals of direct and indirect effects in parallel mediation models.

Bootstrap confidence intervals of direct and indirect effects in parallel mediation models.</p

Mediating effects of everyday discrimination (EDS) and income on the association between race/ethnicity (Hispanic/Latinx vs. Non-Hispanic/Latinx White and Black vs. White) within male and female veterans on the PCL-5, PHQ-9, and GAD-7.

a. PCL-5, b. PHQ-9, c. GAD-7. Note. *p p p < .001; covariates: age, education.</p

EDS total score, EDS items, and EDS reasons by race/ethnicity and gender for entire sample and trauma-exposed sample.

EDS total score, EDS items, and EDS reasons by race/ethnicity and gender for entire sample and trauma-exposed sample.</p

Demographic differences by race/ethnicity group.

ObjectivesBlack and Hispanic/Latinx individuals experience a greater burden of mental health symptoms as compared to White individuals in the general population. Examination of ethnoracial disparities and mechanisms explaining these disparities among veterans is still in its nascence. The current study examined perceived everyday discrimination and income as parallel mediators of the association between race/ethnicity and PTSD, depression, and general anxiety symptoms in a sample of White, Black, and Hispanic/Latinx veterans stratified by gender.MethodsA random sample of 3,060 veterans living across the U.S. (oversampled for veterans living in high crime communities) completed a mail-based survey. Veterans completed self-report measures of perceived discrimination via the Everyday Discrimination Scale, PTSD symptoms via the Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist-5, depressive symptoms via the Patient Health Questionnaire, and anxiety symptoms via the Generalized Anxiety Disorder Questionnaire.ResultsModels comparing Black vs. White veterans found that the significant effect of race on PTSD, depression, and anxiety symptoms was mediated by both perceived discrimination and income for both male and female veterans. Results were less consistent in models comparing Hispanic/Latinx vs. White veterans. Income, but not perceived discrimination, mediated the relationship between ethnicity/race and depression and anxiety symptoms, but only among women.ConclusionsResults suggest that discrimination and socioeconomic status are important mechanisms through which marginalized social status negatively impacts mental health.</div

A Measure of Cognitions Specific to Seasonal Depression: Development and Validation of the Seasonal Beliefs Questionnaire

We introduce the Seasonal Beliefs Questionnaire (SBQ), a self-report inventory of maladaptive thoughts about the seasons, light availability, and weather conditions, proposed to constitute a unique cognitive vulnerability to winter seasonal affective disorder (SAD; Rohan, Roecklein, & Haaga, 2009). Potential items were derived from a qualitative analysis of self-reported thoughts during SAD-tailored cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT-SAD) and subsequently refined based on qualitative feedback from 48 SAD patients. In the psychometric study (N = 536 college students), exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses pruned the items to a 26-item scale with a 5-factor solution, demonstrating good internal consistency, convergent and divergent validity, and 2-week test-retest reliability. In a known groups comparison, the SBQ discriminated SAD patients (n = 86) from both nonseasonal major depressive disorder (MDD) patients (n = 30) and healthy controls (n = 110), whereas a generic measure of depressogenic cognitive vulnerability (the Dysfunctional Attitudes Scale [DAS]) discriminated MDD patients from the other groups. In a randomized clinical trial comparing CBT-SAD with light therapy (N = 177), SBQ scores improved at twice the rate in CBT-SAD than in light therapy. Greater change in SBQ scores during CBT-SAD, but not during light therapy, was associated with a lower risk of depression recurrence 2 winters later. In contrast, DAS scores improved comparably during CBT-SAD and light therapy, and DAS change was unrelated to recurrence following either treatment. These results support using the SBQ as a brief assessment tool for a SAD-specific cognitive vulnerability and as a treatment target in CBT-SAD. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved)