A picture of medically assisted reproduction activities during the COVID-19 pandemic in Europe

STUDY QUESTION: How did coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) impact on medically assisted reproduction (MAR) services in Europe during the COVID-19 pandemic (March to May 2020)? SUMMARY ANSWER: MAR services, and hence treatments for infertile couples, were stopped in most European countries for a mean of 7 weeks. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: With the outbreak of COVID-19 in Europe, non-urgent medical care was reduced by local authorities to preserve health resources and maintain social distancing. Furthermore, ESHRE and other societies recommended to postpone ART pregnancies as of 14 March 2020. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: A structured questionnaire was distributed in April among the ESHRE Committee of National Representatives, followed by further information collection through email. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: The information was collected through the questionnaire and afterwards summarised and aligned with data from the European Centre for Disease Control on the number of COVID-19 cases per country. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: By aligning the data for each country with respective epidemiological data, we show a large variation in the time and the phase in the epidemic in the curve when MAR/ART treatments were suspended and restarted. Similarly, the duration of interruption varied. Fertility preservation treatments and patient supportive care for patients remained available during the pandemic. LARGE SCALE DATA: N/A. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: Data collection was prone to misinterpretation of the questions and replies, and required further follow-up to check the accuracy. Some representatives reported that they, themselves, were not always aware of the situation throughout the country or reported difficulties with providing single generalised replies, for instance when there were regional differences within their country. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: The current article provides a basis for further research of the different strategies developed in response to the COVID-19 crisis. Such conclusions will be invaluable for health authorities and healthcare professionals with respect to future similar situations.peer-reviewe

L'argot et les changements linguistiques en Bulgarie après 1989

Жаргонът и езиковите промени в България след 1989 година. Статията разглежда развитието на българския език пред последните 20 години, промените, настъпили след смяната на политическия режим, демократизацията на езиковите изяви. В центъра на вниманието са социалните диалекти - групови говори, професиолекти и криминално арго - които претърпяват също значителни промени. Младежките жаргони напускат отделеното им от предишните идеолози място на развалени, долнокачествени прояви езика и се настаняват осезателно в речта на хората, в литературата, пресата, радиото, телевизията, киното, дори и в политическите дебати. Професионалното арго се модернизира и европеизира, появяват се нови криминални социолекти. Промени настъпват вътре в самите социолекти : активно се подменя лексикалният им фонд, отпадат думи, свързани с предишния социално- политически контекст, раждат се нови, възкресяват се излезли от употреба изрази и форми. Този социолектен ренесанс, обаче, не само разкрепостява езика, но и поражда редица въпроси, като например за чистотата на езика, за стиловете и тяхната употреба, за езиковата култура и образованието, чиито отговори често предизвикват горещи дискусии.Slang and Linguistic Transformations in Bułgaria after 1989. This article examines the transformations which affected Bulgarian language during the last twenty years, the changes that took place after the fall of the communist regime, and the process of democratization of ail linguistic domains. The focal point is set on social dialects - corporative slang, profes- sional jargons, and criminal argot - which also went through significant renewal. The corporative slang of students and school pupils left its position of a second-class, corrupted linguistic phenomenon assigned to it by the communist ideologues, and took its natural place in the media, cinema, literature, and even in political debates. Professional jargons were significantly transformed and democratized too and new types of criminal argot appeared. Great transformations occurred within ail sociolects : their vocabulary and grammar were largely modernized, many words and phrases linked to the old regime were replaced, new ones emerged, forgotten ones revitalized, grammatical models and raies created. However, this specifie linguistic renaissance not only liberated and emancipated the social dialects but led to their excessive use and mis interpretation and raised questions about their stylistic fonction and use, their educational role and about the culture of speech. Answers to these questions often provoked passionate debates.Armianov Gueorgui, Vrinat-Nikolov Marie. L'argot et les changements linguistiques en Bulgarie après 1989. In: Revue des études slaves, tome 81, fascicule 2-3, 2010. La Bulgarie : du communisme à l’Union européenne. Langue, littérature, médias, sous la direction de Jack Feuillet et Marie Vrinat-Nikolov. pp. 239-250

Absolute Monocyte and Platelet Counts May Provide Additional Prognostic Information in Primary Gastric Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma Patients Treated with Rituximab and CHOP

Introduction: Primary gastric diffuse large B cell lymphoma (PG-DLBCL) is the most common histological subtype of primary gastric lymphoma. The standard of care of PG-DLBCL patients is the combination rituximab-based immunochemotherapy (R-CHOP). Re-cently, different host-related factors have been shown to have significant prognostic significance in non-Hodgkin lymphoma. However, data regarding their prognostic contribution to PG-DLBCL are limited. Aim: To assess the prognostic impact of a panel of simple, cost-effective laboratory variables which are easy to apply in routine labora-tory use for R-CHOP-treated PG-DLBCL patients in an attempt to identify those among them that are high-risk category.Materials and methods: We retrospectively assessed the possible prognostic impact of different laboratory markers in 42 R-CHOP treated PG-DLBCL patients treated between 2004 and 2014 and followed at a single institution.Results: The estimated 5-year overall (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) of the whole group were 80.9% and 78%, respectively. The absolute monocyte and platelet counts in univariate analysis predicted PFS and OS when analyzed as continuous and dichotomized variables. On multivariate analysis performed with factors included in the stage-modified International Prognostic Index (m-IPI), the absolute monocyte and platelet counts remained independent predictors of PFS and OS. Therefore, the absolute monocyte and platelet counts were combined to generate a prognostic index that identified patients with an especially poor overall survival. Conclusions: This prognostic index was independent of the m-IPI and could provide additional prognostic information for better stratification of these patients

Evaluating risk, safety and efficacy of novel reproductive techniques and therapies through the EuroGTP II risk assessment tool

STUDY QUESTION Can risks associated with novelties in assisted reproduction technologies (ARTs) be assessed in a systematic and structured way? SUMMARY ANSWER An ART-specific risk assessment tool has been developed to assess the risks associated with the development of novelties in ART (EuroGTP II-ART). WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY How to implement new technologies in ART is well-described in the literature. The successive steps should include testing in animal models, executing pre-clinical studies using supernumerary gametes or embryos, prospective clinical trials and finally, short- and long-term follow-up studies on the health of the offspring. A framework categorizing treatments from experimental through innovative to established according to the extent of the studies conducted has been devised. However, a systematic and standardized methodology to facilitate risk evaluation before innovations are performed in a clinical setting is lacking. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION The EuroGTP II-ART risk assessment tool was developed on the basis of a generic risk assessment algorithm developed for tissue and cell therapies and products (TCTPs) in the context of the project 'Good Practices for demonstrating safety and quality through recipient follow-up European Good Tissue and cells Practices II (EuroGTP II)'. For this purpose, a series of four meetings was held in which eight ART experts participated. In addition, several tests and simulations were undertaken to fine-tune the final tool. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS The three steps comprising the EuroGTP II methodology were evaluated against its usefulness and applicability in ART. Ways to improve and adapt the methodology into ART risk assessment were agreed and implemented. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE Assessment of the novelty (Step 1), consisting of seven questions, is the same as for other TCTPs. Practical examples were included for better understanding. Identification of potential risks and consequences (Step 2), consisting of a series of risks and risk consequences to consider during risk assessment, was adapted from the generic methodology, adding more potential risks for processes involving gonadic tissues. The algorithm to score risks was also adapted, giving a specific range of highest possible risk scores. A list of strategies for risk reduction and definition of extended studies required to ensure effectiveness and safety (Step 3) was also produced by the ART experts, based on generic EuroGTP II methodology. Several explanations and examples were provided for each of the steps for better understanding within this field. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION A multidisciplinary team is needed to perform risk assessment, to interpret results and to determine risk mitigation strategies and/or next steps required to ensure the safety in the clinical use of novelties. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS This is a dynamic tool whose value goes beyond assessment of risk before implementing a novel ART in clinical practice, to re-evaluate risks based on information collected during the process

. Evaluating risk, safety and efficacy of novel reproductive techniques and therapies through the EuroGTP II risk assessment tool.

Study question: Can risks associated with novelties in assisted reproduction technologies (ARTs) be assessed in a systematic and structured way? Summary answer: An ART-specific risk assessment tool has been developed to assess the risks associated with the development of novelties in ART (EuroGTP II-ART). What is known already: How to implement new technologies in ART is well-described in the literature. The successive steps should include testing in animal models, executing pre-clinical studies using supernumerary gametes or embryos, prospective clinical trials and finally, short- and long-term follow-up studies on the health of the offspring. A framework categorizing treatments from experimental through innovative to established according to the extent of the studies conducted has been devised. However, a systematic and standardized methodology to facilitate risk evaluation before innovations are performed in a clinical setting is lacking. Study design, size, duration: The EuroGTP II-ART risk assessment tool was developed on the basis of a generic risk assessment algorithm developed for tissue and cell therapies and products (TCTPs) in the context of the project 'Good Practices for demonstrating safety and quality through recipient follow-up European Good Tissue and cells Practices II (EuroGTP II)'. For this purpose, a series of four meetings was held in which eight ART experts participated. In addition, several tests and simulations were undertaken to fine-tune the final tool. Participants/materials, setting, methods: The three steps comprising the EuroGTP II methodology were evaluated against its usefulness and applicability in ART. Ways to improve and adapt the methodology into ART risk assessment were agreed and implemented. Main results and the role of chance: Assessment of the novelty (Step 1), consisting of seven questions, is the same as for other TCTPs. Practical examples were included for better understanding. Identification of potential risks and consequences (Step 2), consisting of a series of risks and risk consequences to consider during risk assessment, was adapted from the generic methodology, adding more potential risks for processes involving gonadic tissues. The algorithm to score risks was also adapted, giving a specific range of highest possible risk scores. A list of strategies for risk reduction and definition of extended studies required to ensure effectiveness and safety (Step 3) was also produced by the ART experts, based on generic EuroGTP II methodology. Several explanations and examples were provided for each of the steps for better understanding within this field. Limitations, reasons for caution: A multidisciplinary team is needed to perform risk assessment, to interpret results and to determine risk mitigation strategies and/or next steps required to ensure the safety in the clinical use of novelties. Wider implications of the findings: This is a dynamic tool whose value goes beyond assessment of risk before implementing a novel ART in clinical practice, to re-evaluate risks based on information collected during the process. Study funding / competing interest(s): This study was called EUROGTP II and was funded by the European Commission (Grant agreement number 709567). The authors declare no competing interests concerning the results of this study