Patients with Pendred syndrome: is cochlear implantation beneficial?

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the benefit of cochlear implantation in patients with Pendred syndrome. DESIGN: Retrospective study. SETTING: Tertiary centre. PARTICIPANTS AND MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Speech perception was measured using a phonetically balanced word list at a sound pressure level of 65 dB. Post-operative phoneme scores at 12-month for adults and 36-month for children with Pendred syndrome were compared to scores of patients with an enlarged vestibular aqueduct (EVA) and a reference group with an unknown cause of hearing impairment. Quality of life was measured with the Nijmegen Cochlear Implant Questionnaire to evaluate the differences between pre- and post-implantation. RESULTS: The mean post-operative phoneme scores were as follows: in the Pendred group, 91% (n = 16; SD = 10) for children and 78% (n = 7; SD = 14) for adults; in the reference group, 79% (n = 59; SD = 20) for children and 73% (n = 193; SD = 18) for adults; and in the EVA group, 84% (n = 6; SD = 7) for children and 66% (n = 12; SD = 22) for adults. A significant difference in speech perception was found between the children of the Pendred group and the reference group of 11.4% (SE = 5.2; P = 0.031). Between the adults, a difference of 11.2% (SE = 6.7; P = 0.094) was found. The difference between the Pendred group and the EVA group was 5.7%(SE = 4.5; P = 0.22) for children and 9.9% (SE = 8.7; P = 0.28) for adults. A significant improvement post-implantation in four of the six subdomains of the quality of life questionnaire was found: basic sound perception (P = 0.002), advanced sound perception (P = 0.004), speech production (P = 0.018) and activity limitations (P = 0.018). The two not significant subdomains were self-esteem (P = 0.164) and social interaction (P = 0.107). CONCLUSIONS: After cochlear implantation, children with Pendred syndrome performed better than the reference group with respect to speech perception, however, adults performed similar. No significant differences were found between the Pendred and EVA group. Consequently, during pre-operative counselling, the two groups of patients may be considered comparable in terms of expected speech perception performance after cochlear implantation

Should healthy Medicare beneficiaries postpone enrollment in Medicare Part D?

We compare estimated lifetime out-of-pocket prescription drug expenditures on outpatient prescription drugs, premiums and late enrollment penalties for healthy 65-year-old Medicare beneficiaries if they (a) purchase Part D as soon as they are eligible versus (b) waiting until they contract a drug-intensive condition. Using data from the Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey, a representative sample of the Medicare population, we estimate the annual probability that a healthy 65-year-old will transition to a drug-intensive health state or death. We then use Monte Carlo simulations to estimate expected lifetime prescription drug spending with and without drug insurance. We find that for the statutory minimum benefit policy with a $30 per month premium, lifetime expected expenditures are about 10% higher for women and 6.5% higher for men if healthy beneficiaries postpone enrollment in Part D. Eliminating the late enrollment penalty would create a significant cost advantage for postponed enrollment, particularly for men. Under current rules, the financial advantage of early enrollment coupled with the reduction in risk associated with purchasing Part D plans and potential utility gains from insurance-induced drug consumption, suggests that immediate purchase of Part D is the optimal choice for Medicare beneficiaries. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Paediatric Cochlear Implantation in Patients with Waardenburg Syndrome

OBJECTIVE: To analyse the benefit of cochlear implantation in young deaf children with Waardenburg syndrome (WS) compared to a reference group of young deaf children without additional disabilities. METHOD: A retrospective study was conducted on children with WS who underwent cochlear implantation at the age of 2 years or younger. The post-operative results for speech perception (phonetically balanced standard Dutch consonant-vocal-consonant word lists) and language comprehension (the Reynell Developmental Language Scales, RDLS), expressed as a language quotient (LQ), were compared between the WS group and the reference group by using multiple linear regression analysis. RESULTS: A total of 14 children were diagnosed with WS, and 6 of them had additional disabilities. The WS children were implanted at a mean age of 1.6 years and the 48 children of the reference group at a mean age of 1.3 years. The WS children had a mean phoneme score of 80% and a mean LQ of 0.74 at 3 years post-implantation, and these results were comparable to those of the reference group. Only the factor additional disabilities had a significant negative influence on auditory perception and language comprehension. CONCLUSIONS: Children with WS performed similarly to the reference group in the present study, and these outcomes are in line with the previous literature. Although good counselling about additional disabilities concomitant to the syndrome is relevant, cochlear implantation is a good rehabilitation method for children with WS

Cochlear Implantation in Patients With Usher Syndrome Type IIa Increases Performance and Quality of Life

Item does not contain fulltextOBJECTIVES: Usher syndrome type IIa (USH2a) is characterized by congenital moderate to severe hearing impairment and retinitis pigmentosa. Hearing rehabilitation starts in early childhood with the application of hearing aids. In some patients with USH2a, severe progression of hearing impairment leads to insufficient speech intelligibility with hearing aids and issues with adequate communication and safety. Cochlear implantation (CI) is the next step in rehabilitation of such patients. This study evaluates the performance and benefit of CI in patients with USH2a. DESIGN: Retrospective case-control study to evaluate the performance and benefit of CI in 16 postlingually deaf adults (eight patients with USH2a and eight matched controls). Performance and benefit were evaluated by a speech intelligibility test and three quality-of-life questionnaires. RESULTS: Patients with USH2a with a mean age of 59 years at implantation exhibited good performance after CI. The phoneme scores improved significantly from 41 to 87% in patients with USH2a (p = 0.02) and from 30 to 86% in the control group (p = 0.001). The results of the questionnaire survey demonstrated a clear benefit from CI. There were no differences in performance or benefit between patients with USH2a and control patients before and after CI. CONCLUSIONS: CI increases speech intelligibility and improves quality of life in patients with USH2a

Cochlear implantation and clinical features in patients with Noonan syndrome and Noonan syndrome with multiple lentigines caused by a mutation in PTPN11

Item does not contain fulltextExisting literature only reports a few patients with Noonan syndrome (NS) and Noonan syndrome with multiple lentigines (NSML) who underwent cochlear implantation (CI). The present study describes four NS patients and one NSML patient with a PTPN11 mutation. They all had severe to profound hearing loss, and they received a CI. The age at which the CI surgery occurred ranged from 1 to 13 years old, and the audiological results in all five patients improved after the CI. Otological and audiological examinations in NS and NSML are important, and for those with severe hearing loss, the CI surgery improved the audiological outcome regardless of age

Eight-year clinical outcome after radioactive stent implantation: A treatment failure without irreversible long-term clinical sequelae

Aims: To assess the long-term outcome of patients who underwent radioactive stent (RS) implantation. Methods and results: The RS study population consisted of 133 consecutive patients who underwent RS implantation between November 1997 and July 2000. They were matched using the propensity score method with 266 patients who underwent bare metal stenting (BMS) in the same span. Long-term survival status and information on MACE (death, non-fatal myocardial infarction or any re-intervention) was retrospectively obtained. Eight-year cumulative survival (90.2% vs. 87.4%, p=0.57) was similar between the RS and BMS group respectively, while 8-year cumulative MACE-free survival was significantly lower in RS patients (42.1% vs. 64.3%, p<0.001) due to the difference in events (mainly target lesion revascularisations [TLRs]) during the first year of follow-up (cumulative 1-year MACE-free survival: 59.4% vs. 86.7%, p<0.001); there was no difference in the MACE rate after the first year (p=0.71). The TLR rate at six months in the RS group was 29.3%, mainly due to edge restenosis and at one year 36.2% (control group: 9.5%, p<0.001). Conclusions: A high incidence of MACE and re-intervention was observed during the first year following RS implantation, mainly

Three-year clinical event rates in different age groups after contemporary percutaneous coronary intervention

Aims: As the global population ages, elderly patients will form an increasing proportion of those undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We investigated the safety and efficacy of bare metal stents (BMS) and DES in all patients undergoing PCI at our institution, stratified by age. Methods and results: We investigated three sequential groups of consecutive patients treated exclusively with BMS (n=2,194; January 2000 to April 2002), sirolimus-eluting stents (SES, n=834; April 2002 to February 2003) and paclitaxel-eluting stents (PES, n=2,841; February 2003 to December 2005). The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality. Secondary endpoints included target vessel revascularisation (TVR) and composite major adverse cardiac events (MACE, defined as all-cause death, any nonfatal myocardial infarction or TVR). Patients were followed up for a median of 1,366 days. Patients were stratified into equal quintiles based on age (73.0 years). All-cause mortality was significantly higher in the eldest two groups, while TVR rates were similar across all age groups. DES were associated with reductions in TVR and MACE and a trend towards reduced mortality in all age groups. Conclusions: DES are safe and effective when compared to BMS, irrespective of age