Bronzealderens kulthuse i Thy – Anlæg med relation til gravkulten

Bronze Age cult houses in Thy Thy is renowned for its many burial mounds from the Bronze Age. During the last 150 years, the mounds have yielded numerous finds from both the early and the late Bronze Age. Naturally, the finds from inside the mounds, from the graves, have been in focus. However, recent investigations have made it increasingly obvious that the graves are sometimes just part of the story. In several cases, structures closely related to burials inside the mounds have in fact been found outside them, often built right up to the foot of the mound. In the context of the Danish Bronze Age this is a rather new realization, as demonstrated by the following presentation of cult structures from the late Bronze Age in Thy. It is a common feature of these structures that traces of them can be found next to large ploughed-over burial mounds, where the levelled filling of the mound has completely or partly protected them against destruction caused by ploughing (Fig. 1).The first well-documented structure of this type emerged more than twenty years ago outside a large, ploughed-over burial mound near Thisted in northern Thy, called “Høghs Høj” ( “høj” being the Danish word for mound). The mound had a diameter of 25 metres and was originally constructed over an inhumation grave from period III of the early Bronze Age (Fig. 2, structure N2). However, the mound also contained secondary burials, such as an urn grave from period IV of the late Bronze Age (Fig. 2, structure N5) dug into the foot of the mound towards the southwest. A number of stone-paved areas were uncovered just outside the urn grave, built right up against the row of kerb stones (Figs. 2-4). These stone-paved ­areas consisted of a single or double line of stones surrounding a square area of approximately 6 by 6 metres (Fig. 2, structure N19). Towards the north, another stone paving, separated from the first one by a stone-free area 1.5-metre wide (Fig. 2, structure N17), had a number of oval stone-free areas marked out (Fig. 3). These stone-free areas may indicate the position of posts, although no post-holes in the subsoil confirmed this theory. No other post-holes connected with the structure were found. Part of the construction furthest away from the foot of the mound has been destroyed by modern ploughing. However, the narrow outer stone paving probably continued in a curve, as strongly indicated by marks in the subsoil (Fig. 3).Connected to the stone-paved areas, and inside the square structure, lithic debitage and some late Bronze Age pottery, probably from period IV or V, were found. The finds do not differ from those known from contemporary Bronze Age settlements, yet the connection with the stone-paved areas and the mound placed the finds in a context somehow connected to the grave cult. This interpretation has been confirmed later by finds of a similar character outside burial mounds in Thy and Mors (Fig. 1). Most of those finds, however, had been severely destroyed by ploughing. Apart from Grydehøj and Gramstrup near Vestervig, the three best parallels are from ploughed-over mounds at Nørhå and near Sundby in central and eastern Thy and at Toftum in southern Thy (Figs. 1, no. 5, 6, and 12). In all three cases, the remains were found of a stone-paved area adjoining the foot of the mound, and in each case, one or more secondary graves from the late Bronze Age were found in the mound just behind the stone-paved area. Figs. 5 and 6 show the finds from Toftum and Sundby. Just as was the case at Høghs Høj, the location of the secondary graves is hardly accidental. At Toftum, two out of three graves positively date from period IV, and the Sundby mound contained an urn grave from period IV.Until now, the best example of a cult construction outside a mound is from Grydehøj in southern Thy (Fig. 1, no. 10), where it can definitely be said that an actual cult house was erected in the late Bronze Age. The mound turned out to originate from the single grave period, but it had been extended during the early Bronze Age. Three secondary cremation graves were found just inside the kerb stones, dug into the Bronze Age mound (Figs. 7, 5-7). One was a small stone cist with just a few burnt bones in the filling; the other was a cremation grave, which must have held a small wooden coffin that contained a little heap of cleaned, white-burnt, crushed bones. The third grave was an urn grave with some white-burnt, crushed bones. None of the graves contained datable grave goods. In Thy, the small stone cist and its surrounding gravel filling would normally date this grave to the first half of the late Bronze Age. The two other graves cannot yet be dated.During the first half of the late Bronze Age, two or more structures were erected outside the line of kerb stones on the southern side. Apparently, one replaced the other (Fig. 7, 8-9). The oldest and best-preserved structure is described in the following as a cult house (fig. 7, 9), which was later partly covered by a completely different, ramp-like structure (Fig. 7, 8). Other stone-paved areas lay towards the east, but they were too poorly preserved to allow any essential conclusions to be drawn about their appearance and purpose (Fig. 7, 10).Once the ramp-like structure was fully investigated, the older structure was revealed (Fig. 8). Its central part was a house with an inner dimension of 5.5 by 5.0 m. It consisted of a wall ditch with traces of rather stout posts placed at relatively regular intervals. Towards the south, the house had an approximately 1-m wide and 1.5 to 1.7-m long, funnel-shaped entrance, and outside the easternmost entrance ditch, a dug hole must have held a post or a stone. West and east of the house were narrow stone-paved areas, seven and four metres long respectively, and around 1.25-m wide. Unfortunately, ploughing had destroyed part of the stone-paved areas, which may have continued in front of the house to the entrance. Before the house was built, the terrain underneath and around it seems to have been levelled. This meant that material was added west of the house and removed east of the house, so that the house was constructed on an approximately horizontal plot. This was revealed by the fact that the western wall ditch of the house had been dug into clayey turfs that had been placed on end, and this layer continued under the long, narrow paving towards the west. Under the eastern paving, in contrast, the subsoil had been removed. The just over 1.5-metre wide area between the wall ditch and the narrow areas of paving had held a thick turf wall. This wall had been preserved to a height of 30 to 40 cm between the back wall and the row of kerb stones defining the foot of the mound. Towards the south, the turf wall seems to have continued to the entrance, which explains why the entrance was so long. Ditches were also found between the surrounding narrow stone-paved areas and the turf wall. They probably contained posts which were intended to prevent the heavy peat wall from sliding onto the paving. The stone-paved areas were either exposed or functioned as the base of an earth layer. Perhaps they should be interpreted as procession paths. No artefacts were found underneath, inside, or on top of the turf wall, whereas pottery and flint were found both on the surrounding stone-paved areas and inside the house. Numerous stones found inside the house must be the remains of a structure (Fig. 8). This could not have been a floor, as more often than not the stones were situated on top of the other finds in the house. The distribution of the stones inside the house was concentrated in the ­areas along the walls, especially the well-preserved corners beside the back wall, with a concentration descending towards the centre of the house. This indicates that they could be the remains of a levelled stone bench originally built along parts of the wall.A single, quite deep, post-hole was found in the centre of the house, underneath the stone layer and the floor layer. A post placed in this hole must have carried the roof of the house (Fig. 9, 4). Further in, closer to the back wall of the house, the bottom of a fireplace appeared in the floor layer as an area of reddish-brown burnt clay (Fig. 9, 5). The fireplace was situated at the end of one of two curved ditches which formed a semi-circular construction or enclosure built up against the back wall of the house. The opening in this enclosure was positioned directly opposite the entrance of the house. This construction probably represented the sanctum of the house. The finds from within the house consisted almost entirely of thin sherds from good-quality pottery. Most of them came from relatively small vessels, probably goblets. A preliminary dating of the sherds dates the house to period IV or V of the later Bronze Age. Most of the pottery was found just inside the entrance and in the back third of the house, on both sides of the entrance to the semi-circular enclosure (Fig. 10). A small amount of white-burnt broken bones found in the house has been investigated, but whether they were from humans or animals was not determined. If they are human, these bones may constitute a direct connection to one or more of the cremation graves situated just behind the house. It is therefore possible that for reasons still concealed to us the burnt bones were placed in the house before they were buried.Quite a few cooking-pits, apparently contemporary with the cult structures, were found outside the house and the narrow stone-paved areas (Fig. 7). The cooking-pits outside and the drinking vessels inside the house indicate that ceremonies involving eating and drinking formed part of the grave cult. The ploughed-over mound of Gramstrup is situated only 900 m northwest of Grydehøj. The investigation of this mound began in the same year as the Grydehøj excavations finished. Quite unexpectedly, a cult structure was also found near the foot of this mound. Besides having a number of similarities to Grydehøj, the Gramstrup structures provided opportunities for new observations. As in the Grydehøj case, the mound was erected during the single grave period. All in all, this mound had six or perhaps seven ­phases, the last of which – involving enlargement of the mound to a diameter of c.25 m – was probably not constructed until period II or III of the early Bronze Age. There were no preserved grave-finds from that time, however.The Gramstrup cult structure measured 8 by 13 m. As was the case at Grydehøj, the structure was flanked by narrow stone-paved areas adjoining the eastern foot of the mound (Figs. 11 and 12). The paved areas consisted of stones of a diameter of 10 to 15 cm, arranged in a single layer. The best preserved northern paving, which had a width of 0.5 to 1.0 m and a length of 6 m, continued at a right angle for another couple of metres into the area in front of the structure towards the east, as was probably also the case at Grydehøj. The southern stone paving probably had a similar course originally, but it was poorly preserved. The outer edge of the northern stone paving was made up by a row of somewhat larger stones, carefully arranged (Fig. 13). The distance between the outer edges of the two stone-paved areas was approximately 13 metres. This and other measurements were very similar to what was observed at Grydehøj. However, the Gramstrup structure had traces of a somewhat different construction inside the stone-paved areas. In the Grydehøj case, we were dealing with a square ditch structure, interpreted as an actual house, whereas in Gramstrup there were traces from a circular structure some 6.5 to 7-m in diameter, presenting itself as a border of flat stones preserved in situ, and as stone impressions (Fig. 12,2). The stone border had a width of up to 1 m, and because of its circular course, it was tempting at first to interpret it as a chain of kerb stones surrounding a completely vanished small mound, which had been built up against the Bronze Age mound. This theory, however, is contradicted by a number of circumstances – for instance the complete lack of mound-filling within the circle, and the fact that the stone border is placed exactly in the middle of the symmetrical axis of the entire cult structure. Moreover, the diameter of the circular stone border almost completely matches the inner diameter of the Grydehøj cult house. For these reasons, there is no doubt that the structure should be considered an integrated part of the cult structure; it is an entirely different matter, however, to establish whether or not a house was erected on this site, as was the case at Grydehøj.On the inside of the stone-paved areas (Fig. 12, 5), exactly as at Grydehøj, a c.1.5-m wide turf wall had been built. The turf wall was observed as being stratigraphically later, both to the north and to the south, than some collapsed filling from the mound. This is in keeping with the fact that we are dealing with a structure built onto the already existing mound. Inside the turf wall, the circular stone border may be regarded as some sort of bench or seating construction. The distance from the outer stone border to the turf wall is at least 0.5 m. The shape towards the east, where the entrance to the whole structure must have been, is unknown, as not many traces are left from the stone border in this area. As the turf structure resembles that of Grydehøj, it is possible that a cult house also existed next to the Gramstrup mound. This interpretation is supported by the fact that a post in the centre of the structure (Fig. 12,14) may have supported the roof, and that a few post-holes, perhaps from an inner partition wall, were observed on the inside of the northern turf wall, between the wall and the stone border. In the area between the turf wall and the surrounding stone paving – within the wall, that is – traces were found from a number of rammed-down posts, which probably supported the wall on the outside (Fig. 12, 3). The distance between these posts indicates that they were joined together by interlacing branches. As opposed to the Grydehøj case, no artefacts were found in the central part of the structure. Only a small concentration of pottery sherds of uncertain date was found on the northern stone paving. A strong blade-knife of flint with a retouched back, of a type usually dating from the late Bronze Age, was found close to the northern stone paving.The only Bronze Age grave found in the Gramstrup mound was dug into the mound-filling about 1 m west of the back of the cult structure (Fig. 12, 1). The structure was probably made in connection with this burial. The grave was a cremation grave in a trough-like pit measuring 1.2 by c.0.75 m. At either end there was a rather large stone resting on the bottom of the grave. Between the stones, and about half way down the filling, was a thick layer of burnt, crushed bones. The layer covered a small area of the grave pit measuring approximately 33 by 60 cm and had a depth of 5 cm. As is the case with many late Bronze Age graves in Thy, the grave filling consisted of cleaned pebbles, in this case beach stones worn by being rolled by water. The results of a C-14 dating of the bones are not yet available. The strong likeness between the Gramstrup grave and two of the Grydehøj graves indicates that they are probably closely contemporary. A dating of these graves to period IV of the late Bronze Age fits well with the dating to the transition between period III/IV or period IV of a somewhat larger, but structurally very similar male grave at Vibberstoft, Villerslev parish, which had been placed at the edge of an older mound (cf. Fig. 1, no. 7). Here, the remains of badly damaged stone-paved areas were found outside the grave and up against the foot of the mound. They are interpreted as the remains of an almost completely destroyed cult structure. If a line were drawn through the centre of the cult structure at Gramstrup, through the middle of the two flanking stone-paved areas, and through the centre of the stone border within these, it would hit the middle of the grave in the foot of the mound precisely. This cannot be a coincidence, and it confirms the connection between the grave and the cult structure, as known from other similar structures in Thy.The cult houses from Grydehøj and Gramstrup have provided us with a key to explaining a number of other structures in northwest Jutland – first of all, the structure found at Høghs Høj, which may now be interpreted with certainty as a cult house almost identical to the one found at Grydehøj. Even when it comes to size, the square inner structure from Høghs Høj (Fig. 4) matches with a surprising degree of similarity the inside of the Grydehøj house (Fig. 9). As for the Sundby mound and other finds of stone-paved areas outside mounds in Thy and on Mors (cf. Fig. 1), for the time being we must merely note that they are related to the Grydehøj house, although there is no guarantee that a house was indeed built next to these mounds. Stone-paved areas alone may have indicated a ceremonial area in front of the mounds and may not have been connected with any building.In Kobberup near Skive (Fig. 1, no. 16), an almost circular structure was excavated. It was built up against a mound with a megalith chamber as its primary grave (Fig. 14). In this particular case an inner, semi-circular enclosure had been built onto the older mound, like the examples in Thy. Behind it, inside the foot of the older mound, were two possible cremation graves. This find has both striking differences from the finds in Thy and features that strongly resemble them, but unfortunately the dating of the structure is uncertain.From the rest of Denmark, parallels to the cult structures mentioned here are still few. One find from Zealand is rather similar, though. In Ballermosen near Jægerspris in Hornsherred a small rectangular building built up against the foot of an early Bronze Age mound was interpreted by the excavator as a cult house. In spite of the differences between this find and those from NW Jutland, there are strong indications that the house in Ballermosen was connected to the grave cult in the same way that the houses of the Grydehøj type were. In the case of another site in North Zealand, the house at Sandagergård, there cannot be said to be a connection similar to the one established in Thy between the mound and the cult structure, but the cult house and the contemporary graves within the house there were most probably related. It is this connection between graves – with or without a mound – and cult structures that is no doubt the decisive element, and it can be seen in different versions also in Sweden and Northern Germany. Although the new cult structures from Thy seem to be of a local design, they should no doubt be seen as part of a larger context.There is much to indicate that structures outside the mounds were in fact extremely common, and that at a certain period they were even the rule rather than the exception. The Thy finds have really made evident in earnest the prospects opened up by this fact, as is illustrated by a new structure uncovered next to Høghs Høj.In 2000, the remains of a new cult structure were uncovered next to a hitherto unknown demolished mound, immediately southeast of Høghs Høj (Fig. 15). Although this find is poorly preserved compared with the ones excavated earlier, there is no doubt that this is a structure of the same category. One could hardly wish for a better illustration of the common nature of this type of structure.Bjarne Henning NielsenVesthimmerlands MuseumJens-Henrik BechMuseet for Thy og Vester HanherredTranslated by Annette Lerche Troll

Iron Age finds from the valley of Egå

                              Iron Age finds from the valley of Egå For a long time it has been known that the Lisbjerg area North of Århus has many graves from the Late Pre-Roman and Early Roman Iron Age -in other words: the time from c. 50BC until c. 200 AD. lnhumation graves from the Early Roman Iron Age are particularly conspicuous, both because of their form and their content. Because of the quite large number of clay vessels which are usually found in each grave, this grave type became known at an early date as "East Jutland Pottery Graves". About the beginning of the 20th century the National Museum keeper Carl Neergaard undertook excavations on several hundred graves in this area. The best known site was the Bulbjerg burial ground. At that time it was more difficult to find the settlements to which the burial grounds belonged. However, some were found but they were only investigated to a very limited degree. The reason for this was that economically justifiable methods for the uncovering of vast settlement areas from Prehistoric periods were not developed until the 1960s. Since the 1970s Forhistorisk Museum Moesgård has participated in the hunt for Iron Age settlements and, since the beginning of the 1990s, the location and excavation of these settlements has speeded up. There are several reasons for this intense archaeological activity. In particular, the municipalities of Århus and Hinnerup wanted to prepare large areas for sale for industrial development along the valley of Egå, by which Lisbjerg is situated. The Egå valley is a wide sub-glacial stream trench in the characteristically undulating landscape of Eastern Jutland. The sides of the valley are quite steep in some places but at others they fall evenly towards the bottom of the valley from both North and South. The water of the Egå runs through the valley into the meadows at Lystrup and from there flows into the Bay of Århus. The soil on the hillsides and on the hills above the valley is amongst the best in Jutland. The valley itself offered meadows, fresh water and fields for animals and crops. In this article an attempt is made to prove a relationship between the burial grounds and the settlements that are now known from the Early Iron Age. The settlements are either completely excavated, or established through trial excavations, located through reconnaissance of the topsoil. The burial grounds have all been completely or partly excavated. All the sites mentioned are West of Lystrup Enge ('enge' means 'meadows') and the upper part of the Egå valley. South of the Egå, near Skejby Hospital, there is a settlement system consisting of two villages, one succeeding the other. Only one of them has been excavated, the Sommerlyst I site, whereas trial trenches were made at the other site. Sommerlyst I consisted of 16 long­houses. They were not all contemporary but it was possible to observe how the individual house had been rebuilt, added to, made smaller and removed. It seems as if the individual houses were kept within a strict "lot" system. The village had a burial ground with 17 graves attached to it. Two of the graves were different from the rest in terms of size and grave goods. Details relating to the form of the graves and their contents illustrate the wide variations in the grave appearance of this period. The discovery of more grave sites is to be expected in spite of the density of the modern settlement (fig. 1-4). A village was not the only settlement type found from the period in question. At Børglumvej a solitary farm consisting of a long-house and a smaller building was excavated. The most important contribution made by this site is that a macro fossil investigation was carried out, as well as pollen analyses from layers in a small boggy area immediately next to the farm. The analyses showed that the landscape was open and tree-less, chat different types of grain were grown, and that a variation of other planes and seeds were gathered. The boggy area, which was a pond at the time of the farm, was presumably kept clean (fig. 1). The previously known burial grounds just to the North of Lisbjerg, by the farm of Rugård, as well as the burial grounds at and near the Bulbjergbanke to the East of Lisbjerg were probably related to two settlements. At the farm of Rugård two settlements (or rather, two phases of a moving village) have been located and it is possible to see how the grave sites were located around the village. A similar pattern must apply to Bulbjerg but here the village has not yet been found -or perhaps it disappeared during extraction of gravel. It has been demonstrated that even the very large Bulbjerg burial ground originally consisted of several smaller grave sites (fig. 5-6). Further into the valley west of Lisbjerg a corresponding burial ground/village system has been established at the farms of Vestergård and Lisbjerggård (Klokhøje) (fig. 7). Similar associations were found in an area east of the small town of Søften as well as in an area west of Søften (fig. 8). In the eastern system the village called Damgården IV was excavated along with traces of various activities from a larger area, which must have originated from the Damgården IV village (fig. 9). In the same area a couple of smaller burial grounds in burial mounds and in stone burial cairns have been excavated, and it should be noted that several graves had previously been excavated in this area, (figs. 10-11). The system west of Søften consisted of a small village and -about 200 metres from this- a small burial ground with six inhumation graves (fig. 12). So far eight settlement sites in the Egå valley have been described, one south and seven north of the river. Several types are represented. Solitary farms, as at Børglum and perhaps Lisbjerg Terp, large villages, such as Sommerlyst I and Damgården IV, small settlements, as at Søften Vestergård with only two or three farms and, finally, villages which have been located but not yet excavated. The settlement area of Skejby probably represents a moving village. The same may be the case of the Rugård and Lisbjerg II settlements. However, at Søften, the Damgården IV village stayed at the same spot for at least 200 years. In the Sommerlyst I village at Skejby the houses were at all times scattered. At Damgården IV this type of settlement existed during the first couple of phases but then the village was suddenly rearranged and, after this, the houses stayed within a strict "lot" system (fig. 9). In this village it was also possible to establish pit digging and other activities outside the village. The mapping of the settlements shows chat at first the villages along the Northern side of the valley were situated with an interval of c. 1 km. However, it should be borne in mind that no settlement further to the north has been included in the investigation. The same distance can be expected on the southern side of the valley. Each village thus had a liberty of action of c. 1 square kilometre. Within -or rather at the outskirts of this area- solitary farms were sometimes established. A burial site was found at Lisbjerg Terp, but none at Børglumvej. At Rugård/Lisbjerg II, Klokhøje and Hørkærgård/Damgården/Søften Vestergård, villages have been positively established, whilst a village must have been situated at Bulbjerg. In four of these cases a number of burial grounds were established around each village -some large, some small and some just consisting of a single grave. The burials were almost always placed at some distance from the settlement. This may be explained by a division of the land into intensively cultivated home fields and a common which was used for other purposes. To judge from the distance from the village, several of the burial grounds were placed on the border between the home fields and the common, but burials must also have been placed in the common. These are often single graves. The location of the burial grounds was not chosen at random. It is no coincidence either that they were often of limited size, mostly consisting of less than 10 graves per site. We do not know how many people lived at each farm at any given time. But if we assume that at least a man and his wife and a number of children lived on each farm, the five farms of the Damgård IV village, for instance, probably housed at least 25 people. Add to this the previous generations and during a period of 200 years this would give quite a large burial ground, if the village buried their dead together. However, this was not the case. Not even at Bulbjerg were the first burials made at a common village burial ground. However, this might have been the case by the 2nd century AD. The many small burial grounds should rather be interpreted as being associated with each individual farm in the village. Such an interpretation helps to explain why the area contains so many grave sites. The Late Pre-Roman and Early Roman Iron Age settlements in the Egå valley do not fit into any predefined settlement pattern. Local conditions decided how a village or farm came into existence and how it developed. But it has been possible to demonstrate a settlement-burial ground pattern, which was repeated at several places along the valley. This pattern is probably representative of the whole area.   Bjarne Henning Nielse