Range of shoulder motion in patients with adhesive capsulitis; Intra-tester reproducibility is acceptable for group comparisons

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Measurements of range of motion play a key role in shoulder research. The purpose of this study is to investigate intra-observer reproducibility of measurements of active and passive range of motion in patients with adhesive capsulitis.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>The study was carried out in a population consisting of 32 patients with clinical signs of adhesive capsulitis. A specified measurement protocol was used, and range of motion in affected and non-affected shoulders was measured twice for each patient with a one-week interval.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>For most of the investigated individual movements, test-retest differences in range of motion score of more than approximately 15° are not likely to occur as a result of measurement error only. Point-estimates for the intraclass correlation coefficient ranged from 0.61 to 0.93.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Range of motion of patients with adhesive capsulitis can be measured with acceptable reproducibility in settings where groups are compared. Scores for individual patients should be interpreted with caution.</p

Hydrodilatation, corticosteroids and adhesive capsulitis: A randomized controlled trial

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Hydrodilatation of the glenohumeral joint is by several authors reported to improve shoulder pain and range of motion for patients with adhesive capsulitis. Procedures described often involve the injection of corticosteroids, to which the reported treatment effects may be attributed. Any important contribution arising from the hydrodilatation procedure itself remains to be demonstrated.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>In this randomized trial, a hydrodilatation procedure including corticosteroids was compared with the injection of corticosteroids without dilatation. Patients were given three injections with two-week intervals, and all injections were given under fluoroscopic guidance. Outcome measures were the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) and measures of active and passive range of motion. Seventy-six patients were included and groups were compared six weeks after treatment. The study was designed as an open trial.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>The groups showed a rather similar degree of improvement from baseline. According to a multiple regression analysis, the effect of dilatation was a mean improvement of 3 points (confidence interval: -5 to 11) on the SPADI 0–100 scale. T-tests did not demonstrate any significant between-group differences in range of motion.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>This study did not identify any important treatment effects resulting from three hydrodilatations that included steroid compared with three steroid injections alone.</p> <p>Trial registration</p> <p>The study is registered in Current Controlled Trials with the registration number ISRCTN90567697.</p

Factor structure of the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index in patients with adhesive capsulitis

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) is a self-administered questionnaire that aims to measure pain and disability associated with shoulder disease. It consists of a pain section and a disability section with 13 items being responded to on visual analogue scales. Few researchers have investigated SPADI validity in specified diagnostic groups, although the selection of an evaluative instrument should be based on evidence of validity in the target patient group. The aim of the present study was to investigate factor structure of the SPADI in a study population of patients with adhesive capsulitis.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>The questionnaire was administered to 191 patients with adhesive capsulitis. Descriptive statistics for items and a comparison of scores for the two subscales were produced. Internal consistency was analyzed by use of the Cronbach alpha and a principal components analysis with varimax rotation was conducted. Study design was cross-sectional.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Two factors were extracted, but the factor structure failed to support the original division of items into separate pain and disability sections.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>We found minimal evidence to justify the use of separate subscales for pain and disability. It is our impression that the SPADI should be viewed as essentially unidimensional in patients with adhesive capsulitis.</p

Shoulder and hand diagnoses, stiffness and associated disability of the upper extremities in patients with type 1 diabetes for more than 45 years. The Dialong study

The purpose of this thesis was to estimate the prevalence of musculoskeletal disorders and associated disability in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (DM1) for more than 45 years and a control group. All persons went through a standardized clinical examination and had shoulder and hand x-rays taken. Historical HbA1c data were collected from patient files 30 years back in time to evaluate the glycaemic burden. We found a very high point prevalence of frozen shoulder in the DM1 group (59 vs 0%) with a 76 vs 14% lifetime prevalence. In the hands the lifetime prevalence of hand diagnoses were: Dupuytrens disease 63 vs 15%; trigger finger 42 vs 11% and carpal tunnel syndrome 37 vs 12%. There was no difference in radiographic osteoarthritis in the hands and only a slight increase of mild changes in the shoulders. The diabetes group reported considerably higher shoulder and hand disability strongly associated with the glycaemic burden. The concentrations of advanced glycation end products were significant higher in DM1, but only weakly associated with back stiffness. The present study suggest that assessment of musculoskeletal pain and disability should be included in future diabetes guidelines

Identification of relevant International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health categories in patients with shoulder pain: A cross-sectional study

OBJECTIVE: To identify the most common problems in patients with shoulder pain, using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) as a reference. DESIGN: A cross-sectional study. SUBJECTS: Outpatients at a hospital with shoulder pain lasting longer than 3 months. METHODS: Patients were interviewed with an extended version of the ICF Checklist version 2.1a. Patients’ problems in functioning, and the magnitude of the problem, were registered separately for each category. Categories identified as a problem in at least 5% of patients were reported. To describe the population, age, diagnosis, work participation and the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) were recorded. RESULTS: A total of 165 patients with a mean age of 46.5 years (standard deviation 12.5) and a SPADI score of 47.4 (standard deviation 21.1) were included. Of the participants, 92.8% were either employed or students, 35.2% of whom were on sick leave. The primary result was the identification of 61 condition-specific second-level ICF categories: 19 in the body functions and structures component, 34 in activities and participation, and 8 in environmental factors. CONCLUSION: The findings provide a comprehensive picture from the patient-perspective of the disability associated with shoulder pain. The findings may enhance multidisciplinary communication in clinical settings

Associations between shoulder pain and functioning on the ICF Checklist and the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand scale – a cross-sectional study

Purpose: The association between patients’ shoulder pain and functioning according to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF), and outcome on a condition specific patient reported outcome measure (PROM), has not been studied. The aim was to investigate how the most common problems on the ICF checklist were associated with shoulder function and disability. Materials and methods: In a cross-sectional design 164 patients ≥ 18 years with chronic shoulder pain were included. The ICF checklist, the Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) outcome measure and the Self-Report Comorbidity Questionnaire were used. A hierarchical regression model tested categories for functioning on the ICF checklist associated with disability on the DASH. Results: Mean age was 46.5 years, 54% were women. 85% had had the shoulder pain longer than 6 months. Mean DASH score was 33.2 points (SD 17.1). Adjusted R2 was 0.67. Older age, being woman and having a lower education explained 22% of the variance on the DASH. The body functions bodily pain, mobility of joints and energy and drive function explained 30% of the variance, and the activities and participation problems lifting and carrying objects, washing oneself and recreation and leisure explained an additional 13%. Conclusions: The shoulder disability was multi-dimensional and comprised body functions and activities and participation. And 67% of the variance in the DASH score was explained. Implications for rehabilitation Persistent shoulder pain results in multi-dimensional disability calling for a broader assessment of function. A biopsychosocial approach to shoulder pain and disability is recommended. Functioning assessed on the ICF checklist can be applied in the assessment of chronic shoulder pain as it contributes to the understanding of self-reported disability on a region specific outcome measure

Self-efficacy and Emotional Distress in a Cohort With Patellofemoral Pain

Background: Patellofemoral pain (PFP) is commonly described and approached in biomechanical terms despite strong evidence that psychosocial factors such as kinesiophobia, emotional distress, and self-efficacy are important in long-standing musculoskeletal pain. Purpose: To describe levels of self-efficacy, emotional distress, kinesiophobia, and widespread pain in a cohort with long-standing PFP and determine their association with measures of pain, function, and health-related quality of life. Study Design: Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Included were 112 patients with PFP (age range, 16-40 years) who had been recruited to a randomized controlled trial. Seven baseline factors (patient sex, pain duration, number of pain sites throughout the body, kinesiophobia [Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia], emotional distress [Hopkins Symptom Checklist], self-efficacy, and knee extension strength) were investigated for associations with the following outcomes: symptoms of PFP (Anterior Knee Pain Scale), pain (worst and usual), and health-related quality of life (5-level EuroQol-5 Dimensions [EQ-5D-5L]). We used bivariate models and multivariable linear regression models with a stepwise backward removal method to find associations with the outcomes. Internal validation was conducted, and adjusted coefficients after shrinkage are presented. Results: Of the study patients, 28% reported emotional distress (Hopkins Symptom Checklist ≥1.75), 69% reported multiple pain sites, and 33% had widespread pain. The kinesiophobia score was elevated, with a mean score of 35.4 ± 8.2. Self-efficacy was strongly associated with better function (Anterior Knee Pain Scale) and health-related quality of life (EQ-5D-5L) as well as lower pain scores in bivariate and multivariable models. Self-efficacy and emotional distress explained 50% of the variance in health-related quality of life (EQ-5D-5L). Conclusion: Our findings support other studies of PFP suggesting elevated levels of kinesiophobia and emotional distress and higher rates of widespread pain compared with the general population or pain-free controls. Higher self-efficacy was associated with better function and health-related quality of life. Together with emotional distress, it explained half the variance of health-related life quality. The results underline the importance of approaching these patients in a biopsychosocial model. Registration: NCT02114294 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier)