Lipoprotein metabolism in hypothyroidism : the contribution of growth hormone

Current data suggest a role for GH in the regulation of lipoprotein metabolism. In hypothyroidism not only the secretion of thyroid hormone, but also of GH is decreased. Generally the effects on plasma lipids seen in hypothyroid individuals are considered to be a consequence of decreased thyroid hormone levels. More then twenty years ago evidence was found that treatment of hypothyroid rats with GH in supraphysiologic doses affects plasma lipid concentrations, but whether a lack of GH (activity) is involved in the pathophysiology of lipid metabolism in hypothyroidism can not be answered from the present literature. The first aim was to investigate whether the changes occurring in lipid metabolism during hypothyroidism, merely result from a lack of thyroid hormone or are also attributable to a deficiency in GH-activity. In hypothyroid women the relationship between GH-activity (lGF-1) and plasma lipoproteins was evaluated (Chapter 2). The effects of a physiological dose of GH on lipoprotein concentrations during the hypothyroid status were studied in hypothyroid and hypophysectomized rats, as reported in Chapter 3. Furthermore, the effects on IGF-I and lipoproteins of substitution of hypothyroid rats with varying doses of thyroid hormone were studied (Chapter 4). The second aim was to investigate the mechanism by which GH can affect lipid metabolism, especially during hypothyroidism. The major cause of hypercholesterolemia in hypothyroidism is a decreased LDL catabolism in the liver. Hypothyroid rats were treated with GH and the effects of the hypothyroid status and GH treatment on liver cell LDL-receptor mRNA, LDL receptor expression and HMG-CoA reductase was studied, as described in Chapter 5. In Chapter 6 the effects of IGF-1, GH and T3 on the expression and function of the LDL-receptor in a human hepatoma derived cell line (HepG2) are described

Boosting care and knowledge about hereditary cancer : European Reference Network on Genetic Tumour Risk Syndromes

Approximately 27-36million patients in Europe have one of the similar to 5.000-8.000 known rare diseases. These patients often do not receive the care they need or they have a substantial delay from diagnosis to treatment. In March 2017, twenty-four European Reference Networks (ERNs) were launched with the aim to improve the care for these patients through cross border healthcare, in a way that the medical knowledge and expertise travels across the borders, rather than the patients. It is expected that through the ERNs, European patients with a rare disease get access to expert care more often and more quickly, and that research and guideline development will be accelerated resulting in improved diagnostics and therapies. The ERN on Genetic Tumour Risk Syndromes (ERN GENTURIS) aims to improve the identification, genetic diagnostics, prevention of cancer, and treatment of European patients with a genetic predisposition for cancer. The ERN GENTURIS focuses on syndromes such as hereditary breast cancer, hereditary colorectal cancer and polyposis, neurofibromatosis and more rare syndromes e.g. PTEN Hamartoma Tumour Syndrome, Li Fraumeni Syndrome and hereditary diffuse gastric cancer

Significance of various parameters derived from biological variability of lipoprotein(a), homocysteine, cysteine, and total antioxidant status

Analytical and biological components of variability and various derived indices have been determined for lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)], homocysteine (Hcy), cysteine (Cys), and total antioxidant status (TAOS) in ostensibly healthy adult Caucasians and in stable outpatients with an increased serum Lp(a). In healthy Caucasians, average intraindividual biological CVs (CVb) were 20.0% for Lp(a), 9.4% for Hcy, 5.9% for Cys, and 2.8% for TAOS, CVbs being similar in men and women. In the outpatient group, CVbs were comparable for Hcy, Cys, and TAOS, but significantly lower for Lp(a) (7.5% vs 20.0%; P <0.0001). Moreover, a significant inverse relation between both biological and analytical CVs (CVa) and serum Lp(a) concentrations was demonstrated. We conclude that average CVa and CVb values, and hence average derived indices, are adequate for Hcy, Cys, and TAOS, whereas individual values should be used for Lp(a)

Cancer Surveillance Guideline for individuals with PTEN hamartoma tumour syndrome

PTEN hamartoma tumour syndrome is a diverse multi-system disorder predisposing to the development of hamartomatous growths, increasing risk of breast, thyroid, renal cancer, and possibly increasing risk of endometrial cancer, colorectal cancer and melanoma. There is no international consensus on cancer surveillance in PHTS and all current guidelines are based on expert opinion. A comprehensive literature review was undertaken and guidelines were developed by clinicians with expertise from clinical genetics, gynaecology, endocrinology, dermatology, radiology, gastroenterology and general surgery, together with affected individuals and their representatives. Recommendations were put forward for surveillance for breast, thyroid and renal cancers. Limited recommendations were developed for other sites including endometrial, colon and skin. The proposed cancer surveillance recommendations for PHTS require a coordinated multidisciplinary approach and significant patient commitment. The evidence base for cancer surveillance in this guideline are limited, emphasising the need for prospective evaluation of the effectiveness of surveillance in the PHTS population

Recognition of genetic predisposition in pediatric cancer patients: An easy-to-use selection tool

Genetic predisposition for childhood cancer is under diagnosed. Identifying these patients may lead to therapy adjustments in case of syndrome-related increased toxicity or resistant disease and syndrome-specific screening programs may lead to early detection of a further independent malignancy. Cancer surveillance might also be warranted for affected relatives and detection of a genetic mutation can allow for reproductive counseling.Here we present an easy-to-use selection tool, based on a systematic review of pediatric cancer predisposing syndromes, to identify patients who may benefit from genetic counseling. The selection tool involves five questions concerning family history, the type of malignancy, multiple primary malignancies, specific features and excessive toxicity, which results in the selection of those patients that may benefit from referral to a clinical geneticist

Cancer Surveillance Guideline for individuals with PTEN hamartoma tumour syndrome.

PTEN hamartoma tumour syndrome is a diverse multi-system disorder predisposing to the development of hamartomatous growths, increasing risk of breast, thyroid, renal cancer, and possibly increasing risk of endometrial cancer, colorectal cancer and melanoma. There is no international consensus on cancer surveillance in PHTS and all current guidelines are based on expert opinion. A comprehensive literature review was undertaken and guidelines were developed by clinicians with expertise from clinical genetics, gynaecology, endocrinology, dermatology, radiology, gastroenterology and general surgery, together with affected individuals and their representatives. Recommendations were put forward for surveillance for breast, thyroid and renal cancers. Limited recommendations were developed for other sites including endometrial, colon and skin. The proposed cancer surveillance recommendations for PHTS require a coordinated multidisciplinary approach and significant patient commitment. The evidence base for cancer surveillance in this guideline are limited, emphasising the need for prospective evaluation of the effectiveness of surveillance in the PHTS population

Genotype-phenotype associations in a large PTEN Hamartoma Tumor Syndrome (PHTS) patient cohort

Funding Information: This work (L.A.J.H. and J.R.V.) was financially supported by the PTEN Research Foundation . E.R.W. and D.G.E. are supported by the NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre (Grant Reference Number 1215–200074 ). E.T. is supported by Region Stockholm (Grant ID, 2020-500306 DS ). L.R. is supported by the Estonian Research Council (Grant ID PRG471 ). Funding Information: This research is supported (not financially) by the European Reference Network on Genetic Tumour Risk Syndromes (ERN GENTURIS)—Project ID No 739547. ERN GENTURIS is partly co-funded by the European Union within the framework of the Third Health Programme “ERN-2016—Framework Partnership Agreement 2017–2021”. Publisher Copyright: © 2022 The AuthorsBackground: Pathogenic PTEN germline variants cause PTEN Hamartoma Tumor Syndrome (PHTS), a rare disease with a variable genotype and phenotype. Knowledge about these spectra and genotype-phenotype associations could help diagnostics and potentially lead to personalized care. Therefore, we assessed the PHTS genotype and phenotype spectrum in a large cohort study. Methods: Information was collected of 510 index patients with pathogenic or likely pathogenic (LP/P) PTEN variants (n = 467) or variants of uncertain significance. Genotype-phenotype associations were assessed using logistic regression analyses adjusted for sex and age. Results: At time of genetic testing, the majority of children (n = 229) had macrocephaly (81%) or developmental delay (DD, 61%), and about half of the adults (n = 238) had cancer (51%), macrocephaly (61%), or cutaneous pathology (49%). Across PTEN, 268 LP/P variants were identified, with exon 5 as hotspot. Missense variants (n = 161) were mainly located in the phosphatase domain (PD, 90%) and truncating variants (n = 306) across all domains. A trend towards 2 times more often truncating variants was observed in adults (OR = 2.3, 95%CI = 1.5–3.4) and patients with cutaneous pathology (OR = 1.6, 95%CI = 1.1–2.5) or benign thyroid pathology (OR = 2.0, 95%CI = 1.1–3.5), with trends up to 2–4 times more variants in PD. Whereas patients with DD (OR = 0.5, 95%CI = 0.3–0.9) or macrocephaly (OR = 0.6, 95%CI = 0.4–0.9) had about 2 times less often truncating variants compared to missense variants. In DD patients these missense variants were often located in domain C2. Conclusion: The PHTS phenotypic diversity may partly be explained by the PTEN variant coding effect and the combination of coding effect and domain. PHTS patients with early-onset disease often had missense variants, and those with later-onset disease often truncating variants.publishersversionPeer reviewe

Expression of type III hyperlipoproteinemia in apolipoprotein E2 (Arg158 --> Cys) homozygotes is associated with hyperinsulinemia

Type III hyperlipoproteinemia (HLP) is mainly found in homozygous carriers of apolipoprotein E2 (apoE2, Arg158-->Cys). Only a small percentage (< 5%) of these apoE2 homozygotes develops hyperlipidemia, indicating that additional environmental and genetic factors contribute to the expression of type III HLP. In the present study, first, the prevalence of type III HLP among apoE2 homozygotes was estimated in a Dutch population sample of 8888 participants. Second, 68 normocholesterolemic and 162 hypercholesterolemic apoE2 homozygotes (type III HLP patients) were collected to investigate additional factors influencing type III HLP expression. In the Dutch population sample, apoE2 homozygosity occurred with a frequency of 0.6% (57 of 8888 individuals). Among the 57 E2/2 subjects, 10 type III HLP patients were identified (prevalence 18%). Comparison of normocholesterolemic E2/2 subjects and type III HLP patients showed that the latter had a significantly increased body mass index (25.6 +/- 4.0 versus 26.9 +/- 3.8 kg/m(2), respectively; P=0.03) and prevalence of hyperinsulinemia (26% versus 63%, respectively; P<0.001). Multiple linear regression analysis

Probability of detecting germline BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants in histological subtypes of ovarian carcinoma:A meta-analysis

Background: Histology restricted genetic predisposition testing of ovarian carcinoma patients is a topic of debate as the prevalence of BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants (PVs) in various histological subtypes is ambiguous. Our primary aim was to investigate the proportion of germline BRCA1/2 PVs per histological subtype. Additionally, we evaluated (i) proportion of somatic BRCA1/2 PVs and (ii) proportion of germline PVs in other ovarian carcinoma risk genes. Methods: PubMed, EMBASE and Web of Science were systematically searched and we included all studies reporting germline BRCA1/2 PVs per histological subtype. Pooled proportions were calculated using a random-effects meta-analysis model. Subsets of studies were used for secondary analyses. Results: Twenty-eight studies were identified. The overall estimated proportion of germline BRCA1/2 PVs was 16.8% (95% CI 14.6 to 19.2). Presence differed substantially among patients with varying histological subtypes of OC; proportions being highest in high-grade serous (22.2%, 95% CI 19.6 to 25.0) and lowest in clear cell (3.0%, 95% CI 1.6 to 5.6) and mucinous (2.5%, 95% CI 0.6 to 9.6) carcinomas. Somatic BRCA1/2 PVs were present with total estimated proportion of 6.0% (95% CI 5.0 to 7.3), based on a smaller subset of studies. Germline PVs in BRIP1, RAD51C, RAD51D, PALB2, and ATM were present in approximately 3%, based on a subset of nine studies. Conclusion: Germline BRCA1/2 PVs are most frequently identified in high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma patients, but are also detected in patients having ovarian carcinomas of other histological subtypes. Limiting genetic predisposition testing to high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma patients will likely be insufficient to identify all patients with a germline PV