30 research outputs found

    Insulin resistance and glycemic abnormalities are associated with deterioration of left ventricular diastolic function: a cross-sectional study

    Get PDF
    <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Left ventricular diastolic dysfunction (LVDD) is considered a precursor of diabetic cardiomyopathy, while insulin resistance (IR) is a precursor of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and independently predicts heart failure (HF). We assessed whether IR and abnormalities of the glucose metabolism are related to LVDD.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>We included 208 patients with normal ejection fraction, 57 (27%) of whom had T2DM before inclusion. In subjects without T2DM, an oral glucose tolerance test (oGTT) was performed. IR was assessed using the Homeostasis Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR). The lower limit of the top quartile of the HOMA-IR distribution (3.217) was chosen as threshold for IR. LVDD was verified according to current guidelines.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>IR was diagnosed in 38 (18%) patients without a history of diabetes. The prevalence of LVDD was 92% in subjects with IR vs. 72% in patients without IR (n = 113), respectively (p = 0.013). In the IR group, the early diastolic mitral inflow velocity (E) in relation to the early diastolic tissue Doppler velocity (averaged from the septal and lateral mitral annulus, E'av) ratio (E/E'av) was significantly higher compared to those without IR (9.8 [8.3-11.5] vs. 8.1 [6.6-11.0], p = 0.011). This finding remains significant when patients with IR and concomitant T2DM based on oGTT results were excluded (E/E'av ratio 9.8 [8.2-11.1)] in IR vs. 7.9 [6.5-10.5] in those without both IR and T2DM, p = 0.014). There were significant differences among patients with and without LVDD regarding the HOMA-IR (1.71 [1.04-3.88] vs. 1.09 [0.43-2.2], p = 0.003). The HOMA-IR was independently associated with LVDD on multivariate logistic regression analysis, a 1-unit increase in HOMA-IR value was associated with an odds ratio for prevalent LVDD of 2.1 (95% CI 1.3-3.1, p = 0.001). Furthermore, the E/E'av ratio increases along the glucose metabolism status from normal glucose metabolism (7.6 [6.2-10.1]) to impaired glucose tolerance (8.8 [7.4-11.0]) and T2DM (10.5 [8.1-13.2]), respectively (p < 0.001).</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>Insulin resistance is independently associated with LVDD in subjects without overt T2DM. Patients with IR and glucose metabolism disorders might represent a target population to prevent the development of HF. Screening programs for glucose metabolism disturbances should address the assessment of diastolic function and probably IR.</p

    Relation of global longitudinal strain to left ventricular geometry in aortic valve stenosis

    Get PDF
    Background: In patients with aortic stenosis (AS), increased afterload induces changes in left ventricular (LV) geometry to preserve a normal ejection fraction (EF). Nevertheless, myocardial dysfunction may occur in spite of a normal EF. Global longitudinal strain (GLS) analysis can detect subtle contractile dysfunction at a pre-clinical stage. The aim of our study was to assess LV function deteriorations with GLS analysis and the association with geometric changes in patients with AS and normal EF. Methods: Forty four patients with moderate to severe AS and 40 controls were enrolled. All patients underwent echocardiography, including two-dimensional strain imaging. The relative wall thickness and LV muscle mass measurements were performed with magnetic resonance imaging and patients were subdivided into four groups: Group 1 with normal LV, Group 2 with concentric remodeling, Group 3 with eccentric hypertrophy, and Group 4 with concentric hypertrophy. Results: The total group of patients with AS showed a GLS of -15.3 &#177; 3.6% while the control group reached -18.9 &#177; 3.2% (p < 0.001). GLS was lower in the hypertrophy Groups 3 and 4 compared to Groups 1 and 2 (12.9 &#177; 3.4% vs 17.2 &#177; 2.5%, p < 0.05, respectively). Splitting the patients into Groups 1 to 4, the GLS was -17.2 &#177; 2.4%, -17.2 &#177; 2.7%, -12.4 &#177; 3.8% and -13.1 &#177; 3.3, respectively (p = 0.002). Conclusions: In subjects with AS, lower GLS is related to LV hypertrophy, but not to the presence of concentric remodeling. Assessment of GLS can identify subtle contractile dysfunction independent of a preserved EF, and might be useful in identifying patients at high risk for the transition from compensatory to pathological remodeling. (Cardiol J 2011; 18, 2: 151-156

    Avaliação da área valvar aórtica combinando ecocardiografia e ressonância magnética

    Get PDF
    FUNDAMENTO: A ecocardiografia transtorácica (ETT) é rotineiramente utilizada para calcular a área da valva aórtica (AVA) pela equação de continuidade (EC). No entanto, a medida exata das vias de saída do ventrículo esquerdo (VSVE) pode ser difícil e a aceleração do fluxo no VSVE pode levar a erro de cálculo da AVA. OBJETIVO: O objetivo do nosso estudo foi comparar as medições da AVA por ETT padrão, ressonância magnética cardíaca (RM) e uma abordagem híbrida que combina as duas técnicas. MÉTODOS: A AVA foi calculada em 38 pacientes (idade 73 ± 9 anos) com a ETT padrão, planimetria cine-RM e uma abordagem híbrida: Método híbrido 1: a medição da VSVE derivada pelo ETT no numerador CE foi substituída pela avaliação de ressonância magnética da VSVE e a AVA foi calculada: (VSVE RM/*VSVE-VTI ETT)/transaórtico-VTI ETT; Método 2: Substituímos o VS no numerador pelo VS derivado pela RM e calculamos a AVA = VS RM/transaórtico-VTI ETT. RESULTADOS: Amédia de AVAobtida pela ETTfoi 0,86 cm² ± 0,23 cm² e 0,83 cm² ± 0,3 cm² pela RM-planimetria, respectivamente. A diferença média absoluta da AVA foi de 0,03 cm² para a RM versus planimetria-ressonância magnética. A AVA calculada com o método 1 e o método 2 foi de 1,23 cm² ± 0,4 cm² e 0,92cm² ± 0,32 cm², respectivamente. A diferença média absoluta entre a ETT e os métodos 1 e 2 foi de 0,37 cm² e 0,06 cm², respectivamente (p < 0,001). CONCLUSÃO: A RM-planimetria da AVA e o método híbrido 2 são precisos e demonstraram boa consistência com as medições padrão obtidas pela ETT. Portanto, o método híbrido 2 é uma alternativa razoável na eventualidade de janelas acústicas ruins ou em caso de acelerações de fluxo VSVE que limitem a precisão da ETT, particularmente em pacientes com alto risco de um estudo hemodinâmico invasivo

    Reduced global longitudinal strain in association to increased left ventricular mass in patients with aortic valve stenosis and normal ejection fraction: a hybrid study combining echocardiography and magnetic resonance imaging

    Get PDF
    <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Increased muscle mass index of the left ventricle (LVMi) is an independent predictor for the development of symptoms in patients with asymptomatic aortic stenosis (AS). While the onset of clinical symptoms and left ventricular systolic dysfunction determines a poor prognosis, the standard echocardiographic evaluation of LV dysfunction, only based on measurements of the LV ejection fraction (EF), may be insufficient for an early assessment of imminent heart failure. Contrary, 2-dimensional speckle tracking (2DS) seems to be superior in detecting subtle changes in myocardial function. The aim of the study was to assess these LV function deteriorations with global longitudinal strain (GLS) analysis and the relations to LVMi in patients with AS and normal EF.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>50 patients with moderate to severe AS and 31 controls were enrolled. All patients underwent echocardiography, including 2DS imaging. LVMi measures were performed with magnetic resonance imaging in 38 patients with AS and indexed for body surface area.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>The total group of patients with AST showed a GLS of -15,2 ± 3,6% while the control group reached -19,5 ± 2,7% (p < 0,001). By splitting the group with AS in normal, moderate and severe increased LVMi, the GLS was -17,0 ± 2,6%, -13,2 ± 3,8% and -12,4 ± 2,9%, respectively (p = 0,001), where LVMi and GLS showed a significant correlation (r = 0,6, p < 0,001).</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>In conclusion, increased LVMi is reflected in abnormalities of GLS and the proportion of GLS impairment depends on the extent of LV hypertrophy. Therefore, simultaneous measurement of LVMi and GLS might be useful to identify patients at high risk for transition into heart failure who would benefit from aortic valve replacement irrespectively of LV EF.</p

    High sensitive troponin T and heart fatty acid binding protein: Novel biomarker in heart failure with normal ejection fraction?: A cross-sectional study

    Get PDF
    Background: High sensitive troponin T (hsTnT) and heart fatty acid binding protein (hFABP) are both markers of myocardial injury and predict adverse outcome in patients with systolic heart failure (SHF). We tested whether hsTnT and hFABP plasma levels are elevated in patients with heart failure with normal ejection fraction (HFnEF). Methods: We analyzed hsTnT, hFABP and N-terminal brain natriuretic peptide in 130 patients comprising 49 HFnEF patients, 51 patients with asymptomatic left ventricular diastolic dysfunction (LVDD), and 30 controls with normal diastolic function. Patients were classified to have HFnEF when the diagnostic criteria as recommended by the European Society of Cardiology were met. Results: Levels of hs TnT and hFABP were significantly higher in patients with asymptomatic LVDD and HFnEF (both p < 0.001) compared to controls. The hsTnT levels were 5.6 [0.0-9.8] pg/ml in LVDD vs. 8.5 [3.9-17.5] pg/ml in HFnEF vs. < 0.03 [< 0.03-6.4] pg/ml in controls; hFABP levels were 3029 [2533-3761] pg/ml in LVDD vs. 3669 [2918-4839] pg/ml in HFnEF vs. 2361 [1860-3081] pg/ml in controls. Furthermore, hsTnT and hFABP levels were higher in subjects with HFnEF compared to LVDD (p = 0.015 and p = 0.022). Conclusion: In HFnEF patients, hsTnT and hFABP are elevated independent of coronary artery disease, suggesting that ongoing myocardial damage plays a critical role in the pathophysiology. A combination of biomarkers and echocardiographic parameters might improve diagnostic accuracy and risk stratification of patients with HFnEF

    Die unterhaltsrechtliche Bilanz als Basis der Einkommensermittlung bei selbstaendigen Unterhaltsverpflichteten

    No full text
    Available from Bibliothek des Instituts fuer Weltwirtschaft, ZBW, Duesternbrook Weg 120, D-24105 Kiel A 168966 / FIZ - Fachinformationszzentrum Karlsruhe / TIB - Technische InformationsbibliothekSIGLEDEGerman

    Growth-differentiation factor-15: A novel biomarker in patients with diastolic dysfunction?

    Get PDF
    FUNDAMENTO: O fator de diferenciação de crescimento-15 ou GDF-15, uma citocina de resposta ao estresse relacionada ao fator transformador de crescimento beta (TGF-ß), está elevado e independentemente relacionado à prognóstico adverso na insuficiência cardíaca sistólica. OBJETIVO: O objetivo do presente estudo é investigar os níveis plasmáticos de GDF-15 em pacientes com disfunção diastólica pré-clínica ou insuficiência cardíaca com fração de ejeção normal (ICFEN). MÉTODOS: Avaliamos 119 pacientes com fração de ejeção (FE) normal, encaminhados à angiografia coronariana eletiva, dos quais 75 (63%) tinham doença arterial coronariana (DAC). Os indivíduos foram classificados como tendo disfunção diastólica ventricular esquerda leve (DDVE grau I, n = 61), ICFEN (DDVE grau II ou III, n = 38) ou função diastólica normal (controles, n = 20). Em um subgrupo de 20 indivíduos, alterações no débito cardíaco (DC) foram medidas através de reinalação de gás inerte (Innocor®) em resposta a um teste hemodinâmico ortostático. RESULTADOS: Os níveis de GDF-15 na ICFEN [mediana 1,08, variação interquartil (0,88-1,30) ng/ml] eram significantemente mais altos do que nos controles [0,60 (0,50-0,71) ng/ml, p = 0,003] e em pacientes com DDVE grau I [0,78 (0,62-1,04) ng/ml, p < 0.001]. Além disso, os níveis de GDF-15 estavam significantemente elevados em pacientes com DDVE grau I, em comparação aos controles (p = 0,003). Adicionalmente, GDF-15 estava correlacionado com os marcadores ecocardiográficos de disfunção diastólica e estava correlacionado com a magnitude da resposta do CO à alteração na posição do corpo de ereta para supina (r = -0,67, p = 0,005). CONCLUSÃO: Os níveis de GDF-15 estão elevados em indivíduos com ICFEN e podem diferenciar função diastólica normal de DDVE. Além disso, os níveis de GDF-15 estão associados com uma redução na resposta do DC no teste hemodinâmico ortostático

    Assessment of aortic valve area combining echocardiography and magnetic resonance imaging

    Get PDF
    FUNDAMENTO: A ecocardiografia transtorácica (ETT) é rotineiramente utilizada para calcular a área da valva aórtica (AVA) pela equação de continuidade (EC). No entanto, a medida exata das vias de saída do ventrículo esquerdo (VSVE) pode ser difícil e a aceleração do fluxo no VSVE pode levar a erro de cálculo da AVA. OBJETIVO: O objetivo do nosso estudo foi comparar as medições da AVA por ETT padrão, ressonância magnética cardíaca (RM) e uma abordagem híbrida que combina as duas técnicas. MÉTODOS: A AVA foi calculada em 38 pacientes (idade 73 ± 9 anos) com a ETT padrão, planimetria cine-RM e uma abordagem híbrida: Método híbrido 1: a medição da VSVE derivada pelo ETT no numerador CE foi substituída pela avaliação de ressonância magnética da VSVE e a AVA foi calculada: (VSVE RM/*VSVE-VTI ETT)/transaórtico-VTI ETT; Método 2: Substituímos o VS no numerador pelo VS derivado pela RM e calculamos a AVA = VS RM/transaórtico-VTI ETT. RESULTADOS: Amédia de AVAobtida pela ETTfoi 0,86 cm² ± 0,23 cm² e 0,83 cm² ± 0,3 cm² pela RM-planimetria, respectivamente. A diferença média absoluta da AVA foi de 0,03 cm² para a RM versus planimetria-ressonância magnética. A AVA calculada com o método 1 e o método 2 foi de 1,23 cm² ± 0,4 cm² e 0,92cm² ± 0,32 cm², respectivamente. A diferença média absoluta entre a ETT e os métodos 1 e 2 foi de 0,37 cm² e 0,06 cm², respectivamente (p < 0,001). CONCLUSÃO: A RM-planimetria da AVA e o método híbrido 2 são precisos e demonstraram boa consistência com as medições padrão obtidas pela ETT. Portanto, o método híbrido 2 é uma alternativa razoável na eventualidade de janelas acústicas ruins ou em caso de acelerações de fluxo VSVE que limitem a precisão da ETT, particularmente em pacientes com alto risco de um estudo hemodinâmico invasivo
    corecore