12 research outputs found

    Glucose levels in first 3 days and neurodevelopmental outcome at 1 year in low birth weight infants: A cohort study

    Get PDF
    Background: Definition of neonatal hypoglycemia is still controversial. Objective: To find the effect of blood glucose (BG) levelsin the first 3 days of life, on developmental outcome at 1 year in low birth weight neonates <2000 g. Methods: A prospective cohortstudy was conducted in tertiary level neonatal intensive care unit and follow-up clinic in south India. Intramural neonates admittedfrom September 2009 to August 2010 were enrolled. Perinatal and neonatal variables were recorded. Respiratory support, fluids,and feeding management were based on the standard protocols. BG was measured within 2 h, then 6 hourly for 72 h by glucometerand BG <50 mg% was analyzed by hexokinase method. Infants were followed until 1 year corrected age and development age(DA) assessed by Developmental Assessment Scales for Indian Infants (DASII). Motor and mental DA at various BG levelswere compared. Composite outcome of motor or mental developmental delay; or cerebral palsy or hearing impairment or visualimpairment was analyzed, and logistic regression analysis was performed. Results: The mean birth weight and gestation of the studygroup (n=129) was 1493 g and 32.5 weeks. The 10th centile of BG in the first 72 h was 51 mg%. BG below 10th centile was seen in60 infants. The mean motor and mental DA of the infants by DASII assessment at 1 year was 11.3 and 11.5 months, respectively.The motor DA and mental DA were significantly higher until 50 mg% lowest BG level, and positive correlation was seen (r=0.26motor, 0.2 mental DA). Mean BG level, the presence of symptoms; number of episodes or small for gestation did not influence theDA. The adjusted odds for poor composite outcome when BG was below 51 mg% is 2.83 (0.65-12.3). Conclusion: Even thoughhigh-risk neonates with BG <51 mg% have a lower motor DA and mental DA at 1 year, than neonates with BG >50 mg%; othermorbidities do determine their composite outcome

    The effects of cerebral oximetry in mechanically ventilated newborns: a protocol for the SafeBoosC-IIIv randomised clinical trial

    Full text link
    Background The SafeBoosC project aims to test the clinical value of non-invasive cerebral oximetry by near-infrared spectroscopy in newborn infants. The purpose is to establish whether cerebral oximetry can be used to save newborn infants’ lives and brains or not. Newborns contribute heavily to total childhood mortality and neonatal brain damage is the cause of a large part of handicaps such as cerebral palsy. The objective of the SafeBoosC-IIIv trial is to evaluate the benefits and harms of cerebral oximetry added to usual care versus usual care in mechanically ventilated newborns. Methods/design SafeBoosC-IIIv is an investigator-initiated, multinational, randomised, pragmatic phase-III clinical trial. The inclusion criteria will be newborns with a gestational age more than 28 + 0 weeks, postnatal age less than 28 days, predicted to require mechanical ventilation for at least 24 h, and prior informed consent from the parents or deferred consent or absence of opt-out. The exclusion criteria will be no available cerebral oximeter, suspicion of or confirmed brain injury or disorder, or congenital heart disease likely to require surgery. A total of 3000 participants will be randomised in 60 neonatal intensive care units from 16 countries, in a 1:1 allocation ratio to cerebral oximetry versus usual care. Participants in the cerebral oximetry group will undergo cerebral oximetry monitoring during mechanical ventilation in the neonatal intensive care unit for as long as deemed useful by the treating physician or until 28 days of life. The participants in the cerebral oximetry group will be treated according to the SafeBoosC treatment guideline. Participants in the usual care group will not receive cerebral oximetry and will receive usual care. We use two co-primary outcomes: (1) a composite of death from any cause or moderate to severe neurodevelopmental disability at 2 years of corrected age and (2) the non-verbal cognitive score of the Parent Report of Children’s Abilities-Revised (PARCA-R) at 2 years of corrected age. Discussion There is need for a randomised clinical trial to evaluate cerebral oximetry added to usual care versus usual care in mechanically ventilated newborns. Trial registration The protocol is registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT05907317; registered 18 June 2023)

    Gastric residual volumes versus abdominal girth measurement in assessment of feed tolerance in preterm neonates : a randomized controlled trial

    No full text
    Background: Preterm neonates often have feed intolerance that needs to be differentiated from necrotizing enterocolitis. Gastric residual volumes (GRV) are used to assess feed tolerance but with little scientific basis. Purpose: To compare prefeed aspiration for GRV and prefeed measurement of abdominal girth (AG) in the time taken to reach full feeds in preterm infants. Methods: This was a randomized controlled trial. Infants with a gestational age of 27 to 37 weeks and birth weight of 750 to 2000 g, who required gavage feeds for at least 48 hours, were included. Infants were randomized into 2 groups: infants in the AG group had only prefeed AG measured. Those in the GRV group had prefeed gastric aspiration obtained for the assessment of GRV. The primary outcome was time to reach full enteral feeds at 150 mL/kg/d, tolerated for at least 24 hours. Secondary outcomes were duration of hospital stay, need for parenteral nutrition, episodes of feed intolerance, number of feeds withheld, and sepsis. Results: Infants in the AG group reached full feeds earlier than infants in the GRV group (6 vs 9.5 days; P = .04). No significant differences were found between the 2 groups with regard to secondary outcomes. Implications for Practice: Our research suggests that measurement of AG without assessment of GRV enables preterm neonates to reach full feeds faster than checking for GRV. Implications for Research: Abdominal girth measurement as a marker for feed tolerance needs to be studied in infants less than 750 g and less than 26 weeks of gestation

    Efficacy of modified Tochen’s formula for optimum endotracheal tube placement in low birth weight neonates- an RCT

    No full text
    <div>Abstract:</div><div>Objective: To study the effectiveness of modified Tochen’s formula (hereafter known as the alternative formula) when compared to Tochen’s formula for optimal placement of endotracheal tubes in LBW neonates.</div><div>Study Design: A randomized controlled trial conducted in 70 neonates. Neonates requiring intubation for ventilation, with a confirmatory chest radiograph, were included in the study. They were intubated using Tochen’s formula (birth weight in kg + 6cm) or Alternative formula (birth weight in kg + 5cm). Tube tip placement was verified and modified, if necessary, after auscultation. The incidence of inadequate placement and optimum length of ET insertion were estimated from the chest radiographs. Incidence of adverse events in the two groups were noted.</div><div>Results: A total number of 92 babies were eligible for the study. One family refused consent and twenty-one families could not be approached and hence not included in study. A total of 70 neonates were randomized and included in the study; 34 in Tochen’s group and 33 in alternative formula group. Baseline characteristics between the two groups had no statistically significant differences (p->0.05).</div><div>Measurements in the alternative formula group were significantly (p - 0.006) closer to the optimal position (distance from optimum - 0.50 cm ± 0.41) when compared to Tochen’s group (distance from optimum - 0.86 cm ± 0.06) The adverse events were significantly (p- 0.005) greater in the group that was intubated using Tochen’s formula (16 of 34, 47.05%) when compared to the group where the alternative formula was applied (5 of 33, 15.15%). Though the percentage of optimum (8 of 33, 24.24%) and adequate placements (29 of 33, 87.87%) of the ET tube was higher in the group of the alternative formula when compared to the optimal (3 of 34, 8.82%) and adequate placement (24 of 34, 70.58%) of ET tube in the Tochen’s group, this was not statistically significant (p- >0.05). The depth of ET placement was found to be overestimated in the Tochen’s group as compared to the group of the alternative formula</div><div>Conclusion: The incidence of adequate and optimal placement of ET tube was higher in alternative formula group and the distance from optimal was significantly smaller when compared to the Tochen’s group. The adverse events were significantly fewer in the alternative formula group. Hence, the use of the alternative formula in low birth weight babies may enable the more accurate placement of ET tubes in low birth weight babies when compared to the Tochen’s formula.</div><div><br></div

    Cerebral Oximetry Monitoring in Extremely Preterm Infants

    Full text link
    BACKGROUND The use of cerebral oximetry monitoring in the care of extremely preterm infants is increasing. However, evidence that its use improves clinical outcomes is lacking. METHODS In this randomized, phase 3 trial conducted at 70 sites in 17 countries, we assigned extremely preterm infants (gestational age, <28 weeks), within 6 hours after birth, to receive treatment guided by cerebral oximetry monitoring for the first 72 hours after birth or to receive usual care. The primary outcome was a composite of death or severe brain injury on cerebral ultrasonography at 36 weeks' postmenstrual age. Serious adverse events that were assessed were death, severe brain injury, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, retinopathy of prematurity, necrotizing enterocolitis, and late-onset sepsis. RESULTS A total of 1601 infants underwent randomization and 1579 (98.6%) were evaluated for the primary outcome. At 36 weeks' postmenstrual age, death or severe brain injury had occurred in 272 of 772 infants (35.2%) in the cerebral oximetry group, as compared with 274 of 807 infants (34.0%) in the usual-care group (relative risk with cerebral oximetry, 1.03; 95% confidence interval, 0.90 to 1.18; P = 0.64). The incidence of serious adverse events did not differ between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS In extremely preterm infants, treatment guided by cerebral oximetry monitoring for the first 72 hours after birth was not associated with a lower incidence of death or severe brain injury at 36 weeks' postmenstrual age than usual care. (Funded by the Elsass Foundation and others; SafeBoosC-III ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03770741.)

    Additional file 1 of Central data monitoring in the multicentre randomised SafeBoosC-III trial – a pragmatic approach

    No full text
    Additional file 1

    Additional file 2 of Central data monitoring in the multicentre randomised SafeBoosC-III trial – a pragmatic approach

    No full text
    Additional file 2
    corecore