15 research outputs found

    Diagnosis of acquired generalized lipodystrophy in a single patient with T-cell lymphoma and no exposure to Metreleptin

    Full text link
    Abstract Background Metreleptin, a recombinant methionyl -human -leptin, was approved to treat patients with generalized lipodystrophy (GL) in February 2014. However, leptin therapy has been associated with the development of lymphoma. We present a unique case of a patient with prior history of T cell lymphoma in remission, who was diagnosed with Acquired Generalized Lipodystrophy (AGL) during the following year after a clinical remission of her lymphoma without receiving leptin therapy. Case presentation A 33-year-old woman with a diagnosis of stage IV subcutaneous panniculitis like T-cell lymphoma in 2011, underwent chemotherapy. Shortly after completion therapy, she had a relapse and required more chemotherapy with complete response, followed by allogenic stem cell transplant on June 28, 2012. Since that time, she has been on observation with no evidence of disease recurrence. Subsequent to the treatment, she was found to have high triglycerides, loss of fat tissue from her entire body and diagnosis of diabetes. Constellation of these findings led to the diagnosis of AGL in 2013. Her leptin level was low at 3.4 ng/mL (182 pmol/mL). She is currently not receiving any treatment with Metreleptin for her AGL. Conclusions Causal association between exogenous leptin therapy and T-cell lymphoma still remains unclear. We hereby present a case of a young woman who was diagnosed with AGL after going into remission from T-cell lymphoma and who has never been treated with Metreleptin. Steroid therapy and chemotherapy might have masked the diagnosis of AGL in this patient. We believe that patients can develop these 2 conditions independent of each other.https://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/148289/1/40842_2019_Article_76.pd

    Endogenous Leptin Concentrations Poorly Predict Metreleptin Response in Patients With Partial Lipodystrophy

    No full text
    Context Leptin replacement with metreleptin improves glycemia and hypertriglyceridemia in severely hypoleptinemic patients with generalized lipodystrophy (GLD), but its effects are variable in partially leptin-deficient patients with partial lipodystrophy (PLD). Objective Compare 3 leptin assays (Study I); identify diagnostic performance of leptin assays to detect responders to metreleptin for each assay (Study II). Design Study I: cross-sectional analysis of average bias between leptin assays. Study II: retrospective analysis of diagnostic accuracy of potential leptin cut points to detect clinical responders to metreleptin. Setting National Institutes of Health; University of Michigan. Participants and Interventions Study I: Metreleptin-naive patients with lipodystrophy (GLD, n = 33, PLD, n = 67) and healthy volunteers (n = 239). Study II: GLD (n = 66) and PLD (n = 84) patients treated with metreleptin for 12 months. Outcome Measures Leptin concentrations by Millipore radioimmunoassay (RIA), Millipore enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (MELISA), and R&D Systems enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (RDELISA). Response to metreleptin therapy was defined as either reduction >= 1.0% in A1c or >= 30% in serum triglycerides. Results RDELISA measured 3.0 +/- 9.5 ng/mL higher than RIA; MELISA measured 11.0 +/- 17.8 and 14.0 +/- 19.2 less than RIA and RDELISA, respectively. Leptin by RIA, MELISA, and RDELISA modestly predicted metreleptin response in GLD + PLD [receiver operating characteristic (ROC) area under the curve (AUC) 0.74, 0.69, and 0.71, respectively; P 0.05 for all). The only reproducible cut point identified on sensitivity analyses was RIA leptin 7.2 ng/mL (sensitivity 56%; specificity 78%). Conclusions Three common leptin assays are not interchangeable, and a reliable cut point to select responders to metreleptin was not identified

    The complicated clinical course in a case of atypical lipodystrophy after development of neutralizing antibody to metreleptin: treatment with setmelanotide

    No full text
    A patient with atypical partial lipodystrophy who had a transient initial response to metreleptin experienced acute worsening of her metabolic state when neutralizing antibodies against metreleptin appeared. Because her metabolic status continued to deteriorate, a therapeutic trial with melanocortin-4 receptor agonist setmelanotide, that is believed to function downstream from leptin receptor in the leptin signaling system, was undertaken in an effort to improve her metabolic status for the first time in a patient with lipodystrophy. To achieve this, a compassionate use (investigational new drug application; IND) was initiated (NCT03262610). Glucose control, body fat by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and MRI, and liver fat by proton density fat fraction were monitored. Daily hunger scores were assessed by patient filled questionnaires. Although there was a slight decrease in hunger scales and visceral fat, stimulating melanocortin-4 receptor by setmelanotide did not result in any other metabolic benefit such as improvement of hypertriglyceridemia or diabetes control as desired. Targeting melanocortin-4 receptor to regulate energy metabolism in this setting was not sufficient to obtain a significant metabolic benefit. However, complex features of our case make it difficult to generalize these observations to all cases of lipodystrophy. It is still possible that melanocortin-4 receptor agonistic action may offer some therapeutic benefits in leptin-deficient patients

    "Fat Shadows" From DXA for the Qualitative Assessment of Lipodystrophy: When a Picture Is Worth a Thousand Numbers

    No full text
    OBJECTIVELipodystrophy syndromes are a heterogeneous group of disorders associated with selective absence of fat. Currently, the diagnosis is established only clinically.RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODSWe developed a new method from DXA scans called a fat shadow, which is a color-coded representation highlighting only the fat tissue. We conducted a blinded retrospective validation study to assess its usefulness for the diagnosis of lipodystrophy syndromes.RESULTSWe evaluated the fat shadows from 16 patients (11 female and 5 male) with generalized lipodystrophy (GL), 57 (50 female and 7 male) with familial partial lipodystrophy (FPLD), 2 (1 female and 1 male) with acquired partial lipodystrophy, and 126 (90 female and 36 male) control subjects. FPLD was differentiated from control subjects with 85% sensitivity and 96% specificity (95% CIs 72-93 and 91-99, respectively). GL was differentiated from nonobese control subjects with 100% sensitivity and specificity (95% CIs 79-100 and 92-100, respectively).CONCLUSIONSFat shadows provided sufficient qualitative information to infer clinical phenotype and differentiate these patients from appropriate control subjects. We propose that this method could be used to support the diagnosis
    corecore