Characterisation of hemidiaphragm dysfunction using dynamic chest radiography: a pilot study

Dynamic chest radiography (DCR) is a novel real-time digital fluoroscopic imaging system that produces clear, wide field-of-view diagnostic images of the thorax and diaphragm in motion, alongside novel metrics on moving structures within the thoracic cavity. We describe the use of DCR in the measurement of diaphragm motion in a pilot series of cases of suspected diaphragm dysfunction. We studied 21 patients referred for assessment of diaphragm function due to suspicious clinical symptoms or imaging (breathlessness, orthopnoea, reduced exercise tolerance and/or an elevated hemidiaphragm on plain chest radiograph). All underwent DCR with voluntary sniff manoeuvres. Paradoxical motion on sniffing was observed in 14 patients, and confirmed in six who also underwent fluoroscopy or ultrasound. In four patients, DCR showed reduced hemidiaphragm excursion, but no paradoxical motion; in three, normal bilateral diaphragm motion was demonstrated. DCR was quick to perform, and well tolerated in all cases and with no adverse events reported. DCR was achieved in ∼5 min per patient, with images available to view by the clinician immediately within the clinical setting. DCR is a rapid, well-tolerated and straightforward chest radiography technique that warrants further investigation in the assessment of diaphragm dysfunction

Standards of care for CFTR variant-specific therapy (including modulators) for people with cystic fibrosis

Cystic fibrosis (CF) has entered the era of variant-specific therapy, tailored to the genetic variants in the Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance Regulator (CFTR) gene. CFTR modulators, the first variant-specific therapy available, have transformed the management of CF.The latest standards of care from the European CF Society (2018) did not include guidance on variant-specific therapy, as CFTR modulators were becoming established as a novel therapy. We have produced interim standards to guide healthcare professionals in the provision of variant-specific therapy for people with CF.Here we provide evidence-based guidance covering the spectrum of care, established using evidence from systematic reviews and expert opinion. Statements were reviewed by key stakeholders using Delphi methodology, with agreement (≥80%) achieved for all statements after one round of consultation. Issues around accessibility are discussed and there is clear consensus that all eligible people with CF should have access to variant-specific therapy

Use of Dynamic Chest Radiography to Assess Treatment of Pulmonary Exacerbations in Cystic Fibrosis.

Background Although spirometry is an important marker in the management of pulmonary exacerbations in cystic fibrosis (CF), it is a forced maneuver and can generate aerosol. Therefore, it may be difficult to perform in some individuals. Dynamic chest radiography (DCR) provides real-time information regarding pulmonary dynamics alongside fluoroscopic-style thoracic imaging. Purpose To assess the effect of pulmonary exacerbation treatment by using both spirometry and DCR and assess the clinical utility of DCR in participants with CF experiencing pulmonary exacerbations. Materials and Methods In this prospective, observational, single-center pilot study, spirometry and DCR were performed before and after treatment of pulmonary exacerbations in participants with CF between December 2019 and August 2020. Spirometry measured forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) and forced vital capacity. DCR helped to measure projected lung area (PLA), hemidiaphragm midpoint position, and speed during tidal and deep breathing. Data were analyzed by using the paired t test or Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Correlation was assessed by using the Spearman rank correlation coefficient. Results Twenty participants with CF (mean age, 25 years ± 7 [standard deviation]; 14 women) were evaluated. Spirometry showed that percentage predicted FEV1 improved from a median of 44% (interquartile range [IQR], 17%) before treatment to 55% (IQR, 16%) after treatment (P = .004). DCR showed improvement in median deep breathing excursion for left and right hemidiaphragms (from 18 [IQR, 11] to 25 [IQR, 16] mm [P = .03] and from 13 [IQR, 6] to 19 [IQR, 14] mm [P = .03], respectively) and in median expiratory speed following deep breathing for left and right hemidiaphragms (from 7 [IQR, 2] to 11 [IQR, 5] mm/sec [P = .004] and 6 [IQR, 3] to 9 [IQR, 6] mm/sec [P = .004], respectively). PLA rate of change during full expiration and change in PLA during tidal breathing improved (from a mean of 42 cm2/sec ± 16 to 56 cm2/sec ± 24 [P = .03] and from a mean of 29 cm2 ± 14 to 35 cm2 ± 10 [P = .03], respectively). Conclusion Dynamic chest radiography demonstrated improvement in diaphragm speed and range of chest wall movement during respiration aftere treatment for pulmonary exacerbations in cystic fibrosis and showed potential as a tool to investigate the effect of pulmonary exacerbations on lung mechanics. Clinical trials registration no. NCT01234567 Published under a CC BY 4.0 license. Online supplemental material is available for this article.</i

Standards of care for CFTR variant-specific therapy (including modulators) for people with cystic fibrosis

Cystic fibrosis (CF) has entered the era of variant-specific therapy, tailored to the genetic variants in the Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance Regulator (CFTR) gene. CFTR modulators, the first variant-specific therapy available, have transformed the management of CF. The latest standards of care from the European CF Society (2018) did not include guidance on variant-specific therapy, as CFTR modulators were becoming established as a novel therapy. We have produced interim standards to guide healthcare professionals in the provision of variant-specific therapy for people with CF. Here we provide evidence-based guidance covering the spectrum of care, established using evidence from systematic reviews and expert opinion. Statements were reviewed by key stakeholders using Delphi methodology, with agreement (≥80%) achieved for all statements after one round of consultation. Issues around accessibility are discussed and there is clear consensus that all eligible people with CF should have access to variant-specific therapy

Phase 2 trial of the DPP-1 inhibitor brensocatib in bronchiectasis

Background: Patients with bronchiectasis have frequent exacerbations that are thought to be related to neutrophilic inflammation. The activity and quantity of neutrophil serine proteases, including neutrophil elastase, are increased in the sputum of patients with bronchiectasis at baseline and increase further during exacerbations. Brensocatib (INS1007) is an oral reversible inhibitor of dipeptidyl peptidase 1 (DPP-1), an enzyme responsible for the activation of neutrophil serine proteases. Methods: In a phase 2, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, we randomly assigned, in a 1:1:1 ratio, patients with bronchiectasis who had had at least two exacerbations in the previous year to receive placebo, 10 mg of brensocatib, or 25 mg of brensocatib once daily for 24 weeks. The time to the first exacerbation (primary end point), the rate of exacerbations (secondary end point), sputum neutrophil elastase activity, and safety were assessed. Results: Of 256 patients, 87 were assigned to receive placebo, 82 to receive 10 mg of brensocatib, and 87 to receive 25 mg of brensocatib. The 25th percentile of the time to the first exacerbation was 67 days in the placebo group, 134 days in the 10-mg brensocatib group, and 96 days in the 25-mg brensocatib group. Brensocatib treatment prolonged the time to the first exacerbation as compared with placebo (P = 0.03 for 10-mg brensocatib vs. placebo; P = 0.04 for 25-mg brensocatib vs. placebo). The adjusted hazard ratio for exacerbation in the comparison of brensocatib with placebo was 0.58 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.35 to 0.95) in the 10-mg group (P = 0.03) and 0.62 (95% CI, 0.38 to 0.99) in the 25-mg group (P = 0.046). The incidence-rate ratio was 0.64 (95% CI, 0.42 to 0.98) in the 10-mg group, as compared with placebo (P = 0.04), and 0.75 (95% CI, 0.50 to 1.13) in the 25-mg group, as compared with placebo (P = 0.17). With both brensocatib doses, sputum neutrophil elastase activity was reduced from baseline over the 24-week treatment period. The incidence of dental and skin adverse events of special interest was higher with the 10-mg and 25-mg brensocatib doses, respectively, than with placebo. Conclusions: In this 24-week trial, reduction of neutrophil serine protease activity with brensocatib in patients with bronchiectasis was associated with improvements in bronchiectasis clinical outcomes