Cerebral microdialysis and glucopenia in traumatic brain injury: A review

Traditionally, intracranial pressure (ICP) and partial brain tissue oxygenation (PbtO2) have been the primary invasive intracranial measurements used to guide management in patients with severe traumatic brain injury (TBI). After injury however, the brain develops an increased metabolic demand which may require an increment in the oxidative metabolism of glucose. Simultaneously, metabolic, and electrical dysfunction can lead to an inability to meet these demands, even in the absence of ischemia or increased intracranial pressure. Cerebral microdialysis provides the ability to accurately measure local concentrations of various solutes including lactate, pyruvate, glycerol and glucose. Experimental and clinical data demonstrate that such measurements of cellular metabolism can yield critical missing information about a patient's physiologic state and help limit secondary damage. Glucose management in traumatic brain injury is still an unresolved question. As cerebral glucose metabolism may be uncoupled from systemic glucose levels due to the metabolic dysfunction, measurement of cerebral extracellular glucose concentrations could provide more predictive information and prove to be a better biomarker to avoid secondary injury of at-risk brain tissue. Based on data obtained from cerebral microdialysis, specific interventions such as ICP-directed therapy, blood glucose increment, seizure control, and/or brain oxygen optimization can be instituted to minimize or prevent secondary insults. Thus, microdialysis measurements of parenchymal metabolic function provides clinically valuable information that cannot be obtained by other monitoring adjuncts in the standard ICU setting

Neuroprotection with an Erythropoietin Mimetic Peptide (pHBSP) in a Model of Mild Traumatic Brain Injury Complicated by Hemorrhagic Shock

Pyroglutamate helix B surface peptide (pHBSP) is an 11 amino acid peptide, designed to interact with a novel cell surface receptor, composed of the classical erythropoietin (EPO) receptor disulfide linked to the beta common receptor. pHBSP has the cytoprotective effects of EPO without stimulating erythropoiesis. Effects on early cerebral hemodynamics and neurological outcome at 2 weeks post-injury were compared in a rat model of mild cortical impact injury (3m/sec, 2.5 mm deformation) followed by 50 min of hemorrhagic hypotension (MAP 40 mm Hg for 50 min). Rats were randomly assigned to receive 5000 U/kg of EPO, 30 μg/kg of pHBSP, or an inactive substance every 12 h for 3 days, starting at the end of resuscitation from the hemorrhagic hypotension, which was 110 min post-injury. Both treatments reduced contusion volume at 2 weeks post-injury, from 20.8±2.8 mm3 in the control groups to 7.7±2.0 mm3 in the EPO-treated group and 5.9±1.5 mm3 in the pHBSP-treated group (p=0.001). Both agents improved recovery of cerebral blood flow in the injured brain following resuscitation, and resulted in more rapid recovery of performance on beam balancing and beam walking tests. These studies suggest that pHBSP has neuroprotective effects similar to EPO in this model of combined brain injury and hypotension. pHBSP may be more useful in the clinical situation because there is less risk of thrombotic adverse effects

Endothelial Nitric Oxide Synthase Mediates the Cerebrovascular Effects of Erythropoietin in Traumatic Brain Injury

Background: Erythropoietin (Epo) improves post-traumatic cerebral blood flow (CBF), pressure auto-regulation, and vascular reactivity to L-arginine. This study examines the dependence of these cerebral hemodynamic effects of Epo on nitric oxide (NO) generated by endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS). Methods: Using laser Doppler flow imaging, CBF was monitored in wild-type (WT) and eNOS-deficient mice undergoing controlled cortical impact (CCI) followed by administration of Epo (5000 U/kg) or normal saline. Results: CBF decreased in all groups post-injury with the greatest reductions occurring at the impact site. Epo administration resulted in significantly higher CBF in the peri-contusional sites in the WT mice (70.2 ± 3.35 % in Epo-treated compared to 53 ± 3.3 % of baseline in saline-treated mice (p< .0001), but no effect was seen in the eNOS-deficient mice. No CBF differences were found at the core impact site where CBF dropped to 20-25% of baseline in all groups. Conclusion: These differences between eNOS-deficient and WT mice indicate that the EPO mediated improvement in CBF in TBI is eNOS dependent

Defining a Taxonomy of Intracranial Hypertension Is ICP More Than Just a Number?

Intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring and control is a cornerstone of neuroanesthesia and neurocritical care. However, because elevated ICP can be due to multiple pathophysiological processes, its interpretation is not straightforward. We propose a formal taxonomy of intracranial hypertension, which defines ICP elevations into 3 major pathophysiological subsets: increased cerebral blood volume, masses and edema, and hydrocephalus. (1) Increased cerebral blood volume increases ICP and arises secondary to arterial or venous hypervolemia. Arterial hypervolemia is produced by autoregulated or dysregulated vasodilation, both of which are importantly and disparately affected by systemic blood pressure. Dysregulated vasodilation tends to be worsened by arterial hypertension. In contrast, autoregulated vasodilation contributes to intracranial hypertension during decreases in cerebral perfusion pressure that occur within the normal range of cerebral autoregulation. Venous hypervolemia is produced by Starling resistor outflow obstruction, venous occlusion, and very high extracranial venous pressure. Starling resistor outflow obstruction tends to arise when cerebrospinal fluid pressure causes venous compression to thus increase tissue pressure and worsen tissue edema (and ICP elevation), producing a positive feedback ICP cycle. (2) Masses and edema are conditions that increase brain tissue volume and ICP, causing both vascular compression and decrease in cerebral perfusion pressure leading to oligemia. Brain edema is either vasogenic or cytotoxic, each with disparate causes and often linked to cerebral blood flow or blood volume abnormalities. Masses may arise from hematoma or neoplasia. (3) Hydrocephalus can also increase ICP, and is either communicating or noncommunicating. Further research is warranted to ascertain whether ICP therapy should be tailored to these physiological subsets of intracranial hypertension