Montessori's mediation of meaning: a social semiotic perspective

The distinctive objects designed by Dr Maria Montessori as the centrepiece of her approach to pedagogy are the topic of this study. The Montessori approach to pedagogy, celebrating its centenary in 2007, continues to be used in classrooms throughout the world. Despite such widespread and enduring use, there has been little analysis of the Montessori objects to evaluate or understand their pedagogic impact. This study begins by outlining the provenance of the Montessori objects, reaching the conclusion that the tendency to interpret them from the perspective of the progressive education movement of the early twentieth century fails to provide insights into the developmental potential embodied in the objects. In order to appreciate that potential more fully, the study explores the design of the objects, specifically, the way in which the semiotic qualities embodied in their design orient children to the meanings of educational knowledge. A meta-analytic framework comprising three components is used to analyse the semiotic potential of the Montessori objects as educational artefacts. First, Vygotsky’s model of development is used to analyse the objects as external mediational means and to recognise the objects as complexes of signs materialising educational knowledge. In order to understand how the objects capture, in the form of concrete analogues, the linguistic meanings which construe educational knowledge, systemic functional linguistics, the second component of the framework, is used to achieve a rich and detailed social semiotic analysis of these relations, in particular, material and linguistic representations of abstract educational meanings. Finally, the pedagogic device, a central feature of Bernstein’s sociology of pedagogy, is used to analyse how the Montessori objects re-contextualise educational knowledge as developmental pedagogy. Particular attention is paid to the Montessori literacy pedagogy, in which the study of grammar plays a central role. The study reveals a central design principle which distinguishes the Montessori objects. This principle is the redundant representation of educational knowledge across multiple semiotic modes. Each representation holds constant the underlying meaning relations which construe quanta of educational knowledge, giving children the freedom to engage with this knowledge playfully, independently and successfully. The conclusion drawn from this study is that the design of the Montessori objects represents valuable educational potential which deserves continued investigation, as well as wider recognition and application. To initiate this process, the findings in this study may provide insights which can be used to develop tools for evaluating and enhancing the implementation of Montessori pedagogy in Montessori schools. The findings may also be used to adapt Montessori design principles for the benefit of educators working in non-Montessori contexts, in particular, those educators concerned with developing pedagogies which promote equitable access to educational knowledge

Percutaneous coronary intervention vs medical treatment in stable angina: the never-ending story

Item does not contain fulltex

Statins and Risk of New-Onset Diabetes Mellitus: is there a Rationale for Individualized Statin Therapy?

Contains fulltext : 133892.pdf (publisher's version ) (Open Access)Statins (hydroxymethylglutaryl-coenzyme-A reductase inhibitors) are first-line agents for the management of hyperlipidemia in patients at high risk of cardiovascular (CV) events, and are the most commonly prescribed CV drugs worldwide. Although safe and generally well tolerated, there is growing evidence to suggest that statins are associated with an elevated occurrence of new-onset diabetes mellitus (DM). Recent experimental and clinical data have prompted the US Food and Drug Administration to add information to statin labels regarding the increased risk of development of type 2 DM. The main purpose of this review is to critically discuss the clinical evidence regarding the association of statin use with new-onset DM, the CV benefit/risk ratio with statins, and the rationale for individualized statin therapy

A meta-analytic overview of thrombectomy during primary angioplasty

Item does not contain fulltextINTRODUCTION: Even though primary angioplasty restores TIMI 3 flow in more than 90% of STEMI patients, the results in terms of myocardial perfusion are still unsatisfactory in a relatively large proportion of patients. Great interest has been focused in the last years on distal embolization as major determinant of poor reperfusion and clinical outcome after primary angioplasty. The aim of this article is to perform an updated meta-analysis of thrombectomy devices in STEMI patients undergoing primary angioplasty. METHODS: The literature was scanned by formal searches of electronic databases (MEDLINE, Pubmed) from January 1990 to December 2010, the scientific session abstracts (from January 1990 to December 2010) and oral presentation and/or expert slide presentations (from January 2002 to December 2010) (on TCT, AHA, ESC, ACC and EuroPCR websites). No language restrictions were enforced. RESULTS: A total of 21 randomized trials were finally included in the meta-analysis, involving 4514 patients (2270 or 50.3% randomized to thrombectomy and 2244 or 49.7% to standard angioplasty). Overall thrombectomy did not reduce 30-day mortality, with more benefits observed only with manual thrombectomy. No difference was observed in the 30-day reinfarction rate, whereas a trend in higher risk of stroke was observed with thrombectomy (p=0.06). Manual but not mechanical thrombectomy significantly improved postprocedural TIMI 3 flow, however, both devices significantly improved myocardial reperfusion as evaluated by ST-segment resolution. By meta-regression analysis a linear relationship was observed between benefits from thrombectomy in ST-segment resolution and in the presence of thrombus at baseline angiography (p=0.0016). CONCLUSIONS: The present meta-analysis has demonstrated that, among patients with STEMI, manual thrombectomy significantly improved myocardial perfusion, with a trend in short-term mortality benefits, whereas mechanical thrombectomy, despite the benefits in myocardial perfusion, did not impact on short-term survival. However, the benefits in myocardial perfusion were significantly related to prevalence of coronary thrombus. In light of the observed higher risk of stroke, thrombectomy cannot be routinely recommended, but should be used in case of evident intracoronary thrombus. Mechanical thrombectomy devices may be considered as well to further improve reperfusion and facilitate optimal stent implantation, especially in the presence of large thrombus burden

Meta-analysis of randomized trials of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors in high-risk acute coronary syndromes patients undergoing invasive strategy

Item does not contain fulltextIt is still unknown whether upstream administration of glycoprotein (Gp) IIb/IIIa inhibitors, aiming at cooling the culprit lesion before angioplasty, is superior to its selective downstream administration in high-risk patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACSs) undergoing coronary angioplasty. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to perform a meta-analysis of randomized trials comparing upstream to downstream administration of Gp IIb/IIIa inhibitors in high-risk patients with ACS undergoing early invasive strategy. We obtained results from all randomized trials on this issue. The literature was scanned by formal searches of electronic databases from January 1990 to March 2010. The following key words were used: "randomized trial," "myocardial infarction," "ACS," "coronary angioplasty," "upstream," "downstream," "Gp IIb/IIIa inhibitors," "abciximab," "tirofiban," and "eptifibatide." Primary and secondary clinical end points were mortality and myocardial infarction at 30 days, respectively. Major bleeding complications were assessed as a safety end point. Seven randomized trials were included in the meta-analysis, involving 19,929 patients (9,981 or 50.0% in the upstream Gp IIb/IIIa inhibitors group and 9,948 or 50% in the downstream Gp IIb/IIIa inhibitors group). Upstream Gp IIb/IIIa inhibitors did not decrease 30-day mortality (2.0% vs 2.0%, p = 0.84) or recurrence of myocardial infarction (7.0% vs 7.6%, p = 0.11) but were associated with higher risk of major bleeding complications (1.8% vs 1.3%, p = 0.0002). In conclusion, this meta-analysis shows that in high-risk patients with ACS undergoing an early invasive strategy, upstream administration of Gp IIb/IIIa inhibitors does not improve clinical outcome compared to a downstream selective administration, and it is associated with an increased risk of major bleeding complications. Therefore, a strategy of upstream Gp IIb/IIIa inhibitors cannot be recommended

Clinical impact of simultaneous complete revascularization vs. culprit only primary angioplasty in patients with st-elevation myocardial infarction and multivessel disease: a meta-analysis

Primary Percutaneous Intervention (PCI) is the treatment of choice for acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Nearly half of STEMI patients have multivessel (MV) disease that has been associated with worse survival. However, current guidelines recommend to treat only the culprit artery (COR) during the acute procedure. Thus, the aim of the current study was to perform a meta-analysis of trials comparing MV PCI vs. COR for STEMI patients with MV disease. Medline/CENTRAL and Web were searched for comparative studies (both randomized and non randomized trials) about MV PCI vs. COR for STEMI patients reporting mortality, re-PCI and re-MI data. Primary endpoint was 30-day mortality. The meta-analysis included 10 studies (2 randomized and 8 registries; N = 31224). As compared with COR, MV PCI significantly reduced long term rate of re-PCI (OR [95% CI] = 0.47 [0.28-0.78], P = 0.003) without increasing 30-day mortality (OR [95% CI] = 1.30 [0.79-2.12], P = 0.31) and long term re-MI (OR [95% CI] = 0.94 [0.43-2.06], P = 0.88). This meta-analysis showed safety and efficacy of MV PCI approach as compared with COR, with a significant reduction in rate of revascularizations, but no advantages in death and re-MI

Manual Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Versus CPR Including a Mechanical Chest Compression Device in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Comprehensive Meta-analysis From Randomized and Observational Studies

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Mechanical chest compression devices have been developed to facilitate continuous delivery of high-quality cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). Despite promising hemodynamic data, evidence on clinical outcomes remains inconclusive. With the completion of 3 randomized controlled trials, we conduct a meta-analysis on the effect of in-field mechanical versus manual CPR on clinical outcomes after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. METHODS: With a systematic search (PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Libraries), we identified all eligible studies (randomized controlled trials and nonrandomized studies) that compared a CPR strategy including an automated mechanical chest compression device with a strategy of manual CPR only. Outcome variables were survival to hospital admission, survival to discharge, and favorable neurologic outcome. RESULTS: Twenty studies (n=21,363) were analyzed: 5 randomized controlled trials and 15 nonrandomized studies, pooled separately. For survival to admission, the pooled estimate of the randomized controlled trials did not indicate a difference (odds ratio 0.94; 95% confidence interval 0.84 to 1.05; P=.24) between mechanical and manual CPR. In contrast, meta-analysis of nonrandomized studies demonstrated a benefit in favor of mechanical CPR (odds ratio 1.42; 95% confidence interval 1.21 to 1.67; P<.001). No interaction was found between the endorsed CPR guidelines (2000 versus 2005) and the CPR strategy (P=.27). Survival to discharge and neurologic outcome did not differ between strategies. CONCLUSION: Although there are lower-quality, observational data that suggest that mechanical CPR used at the rescuer's discretion could improve survival to hospital admission, the cumulative high-quality randomized evidence does not support a routine strategy of mechanical CPR to improve survival or neurologic outcome. These findings are irrespective of the endorsed CPR guidelines during the study periods

Något om normativa resonemang irättsdogmatisk forskning

Den som gör en normativ utsaga anger en norm/rekommendation som hananser bör följas. Rättsvetenskapliga författare är ofta sparsamma med attföra djuplodande normativa resonemang och det diskuteras endast sparsamthur normativa resonemang bör föras i rättsvetenskapliga framställningar.I uppsatsen diskuteras varför det är viktigt att normativa resonemangförs i rättsvetenskapen och något om hur de kan föras.Finansierat av Nordiska skattevetenskapliga forskningsrådet</p