13 research outputs found

    Updated Guidance Regarding The Risk ofAllergic Reactions to COVID-19 Vaccines and Recommended Evaluation and Management: A GRADE Assessment, and International Consensus Approach

    Get PDF
    This guidance updates 2021 GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) recommendations regarding immediate allergic reactions following coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines and addresses revaccinating individuals with first-dose allergic reactions and allergy testing to determine revaccination outcomes. Recent meta-analyses assessed the incidence of severe allergic reactions to initial COVID-19 vaccination, risk of mRNA-COVID-19 revaccination after an initial reaction, and diagnostic accuracy of COVID-19 vaccine and vaccine excipient testing in predicting reactions. GRADE methods informed rating the certainty of evidence and strength of recommendations. A modified Delphi panel consisting of experts in allergy, anaphylaxis, vaccinology, infectious diseases, emergency medicine, and primary care from Australia, Canada, Europe, Japan, South Africa, the United Kingdom, and the United States formed the recommendations. We recommend vaccination for persons without COVID-19 vaccine excipient allergy and revaccination after a prior immediate allergic reaction. We suggest against \u3e 15-minute postvaccination observation. We recommend against mRNA vaccine or excipient skin testing to predict outcomes. We suggest revaccination of persons with an immediate allergic reaction to the mRNA vaccine or excipients be performed by a person with vaccine allergy expertise in a properly equipped setting. We suggest against premedication, split-dosing, or special precautions because of a comorbid allergic history

    Chronic morphine exposure potentiates p-glycoprotein trafficking from nuclear reservoirs in cortical rat brain microvessels

    No full text
    <div><p>The rates of opioid prescription and use have continued to increase over the last few decades resulting in a greater number of opioid tolerant patients. Treatment of acute pain from surgery and injury is a clinical challenge for these patients. Several pain management strategies including prescribing increased opioids are used clinically with limited success; all currently available strategies have significant limitations. Many opioids are a substrate for p-glycoprotein (p-gp), an efflux transporter at the blood-brain barrier (BBB). Increased p-gp is associated with a decreased central nervous system uptake and analgesic efficacy of morphine. Our laboratory previously found that acute peripheral inflammatory pain (PIP) induces p-gp trafficking from the nucleus to the luminal surface of endothelial cells making up the BBB concomitant with increased p-gp activity and decreased morphine analgesic efficacy. In the current study, we tested whether PIP-induced p-gp trafficking could contribute to decreased opioid efficacy in morphine tolerant rats. A 6-day continuous dosing of morphine from osmotic minipumps was used to establish morphine tolerance in female rats. PIP induced p-gp trafficking away from nuclear stores showed a 2-fold increase in morphine tolerant rats. This observation suggests that p-gp trafficking contributes to the decreased morphine analgesic effects in morphine tolerant rats experiencing an acute pain stimulus. Attenuating p-gp trafficking during an acute pain stimulus could improve pain management by increasing the amount of opioid that could reach CNS analgesic targets and decrease the need for the dose escalation that is a serious challenge in pain management.</p></div

    Chronic morphine exposure has no effect on total p-gp expression in the whole brain or microvessel isolates.

    No full text
    <p><b>(A)</b> Representative immunoblot indicating p-gp and tubulin as a loading control in whole brain cortex. P-gp expresion normalized to tubulin in whole brain cortex samples. Values are the mean + SEM (n = 3 pools of 3 rats each) <b>(B)</b> Representative immune blot indicating p-gp and tubulin in microvessel isolates. P-gp expresion normalized to tubulin in microvessel isolate samples. Values are the mean + SEM (n = 3 pools of 3 rats each).</p

    Chronic morphine exposure has no effect on hind paw edema following 位-carrageenan injection.

    No full text
    <p><b>(A)</b> Animals tested for mechanical sensitivity. <b>(B)</b> Animals tested for thermal sensitivity. The symbols mean: SS: Saline osmotic minipump/ Saline hind paw injection (100 渭L); SC: Saline osmotic minipump/ 位-carrageenan hind paw injection (100 渭L); MS: Morphine (5 mg/kg/day) osmotic minipump/ Saline hind paw injection (100 渭L); MC: Morphine (5 mg/kg/day) osmotic minipump/ 位-carrageenan hind paw injection (100 渭L). Values are the mean + SEM (A: n = 16, B: n = 18). *** denotes significantly different (p<0.0001).</p

    Prolonged morphine exposure eliminates the antinociceptive effect of acute morphine administration on mechanical sensitivity.

    No full text
    <p><b>(A)</b> Timeline of treatments used in these experiments. <b>(B)</b> Mechanical ipsilateral paw withdrawal threshold determined by the von Frey mechanical sensitivity test in rats exposed to 5 mg/kg/day of morphine or saline for 6 days, then treated with an acute dose (2.5 mg/kg) of morphine or saline (time = 0) 3 hours after injection of 位-carrageenan into the left hind paw. The symbols mean: SCS: Saline osmotic minipump (24 渭L/day)/ 位-carrageenan hind paw injection (0.1 mL)/ Saline intraperitoneal injection (1 mL/kg);SCM: Saline osmotic minipump (24 渭L/day)/ 位-carrageenan hind paw injection (0.1 mL)/ Morphine intraperitoneal injection (1mL/kg) (2.5 mg/kg);MCS: Morphine osmotic minipump (24 渭L/day) (5mg/kg/day)/ 位-carrageenan hind paw injection (0.1 mL)/ Saline intraperitoneal injection (1 mL/kg);MCM: Morphine osmotic minipump (24 渭L/day) (5mg/kg/day)/ 位-carrageenan hind paw injection (0.1 mL)/ Morphine intraperitoneal injection (1 mL/kg) (2.5 mg/kg). Values are the mean +/- SEM (n = 8). <b>(C)</b> The area under the curve for the animals treated with SCM and MCM during the peak observed morphine effect (between 20 minutes and 60 minutes). Values are the mean + SEM (n = 8). *** denotes significantly different (p<0.0001).</p

    Suggested model demonstrating p-gp trafficking in the presence of peripheral inflammatory pain.

    No full text
    <p>In the presense of saline <b>(A)</b>, PIP induces trafficking of p-gp away from the nucleus <b>(B)</b> to the endothelial cell membrane where p-gp can efflux substrate through the membrane <b>(C)</b>. In the presense of morhine <b>(D)</b>, this trafficking is increased <b>(E)</b> resulting in a greater presense of p-gp at the cell membrane and an increase in substrate efflux <b>(F)</b>.</p

    Prolonged morphine exposure eliminates the antinociceptive effect of acute morphine administration on thermal sensitivity.

    No full text
    <p><b>(A)</b> Thermal paw withdrawal threshold was determined by the Hargraves thermal sensitivity test in the ipsilateral paw of rats exposed to 5 mg/kg/day of morphine or saline for 6 days, then treated with an acute dose (2.5 mg/kg) of morphine or saline (time = 0) 3 hours after injection of 位-carrageenan into the left hind paw. The symbols mean: SCS: Saline osmotic minipump (24 渭L/day)/ 位-carrageenan hind paw injection (0.1 mL)/ Saline intraperitoneal injection (1 mL/kg);SCM: Saline osmotic minipump (24 渭L/day)/ 位-carrageenan hind paw injection (0.1 mL)/ Morphine intraperitoneal injection (1 mL/kg) (2.5 mg/kg);MCS: Morphine osmotic minipump (24 渭L/day) (5 mg/kg/day)/ 位-carrageenan hind paw injection (0.1 mL)/ Saline intraperitoneal injection (1 mL/kg);MCM: Morphine osmotic minipump (24 渭L/day) (5 mg/kg/day)/ 位-carrageenan hind paw injection (0.1 mL)/ Morphine intraperitoneal injection (1 mL/kg) (2.5 mg/kg). Values are the mean +/- SEM (n = 9). <b>(B)</b> The area under the curve for the animals treated with SCM and MCM during the peak observed morphine effect (between 30 minutes and 60 minutes). Values are mean + SEM (n = 9). *** denotes significantly different (p = 0.007).</p

    Chronic morphine exposure increases trafficking of p-gp away from the nucleus after peripheral inflammatory pain.

    No full text
    <p><b>(A)</b> P-gp expresion normalized to nucleoporin in the nuclear fractions. Values are the mean + SEM (n = 3 pools of 3 rats each) <b>(B)</b> Ratio of nuclear p-gp normalized to nulcoporin in CAR/SAL injected animals as a measure of p-gp trafficking. The dashed line indicates the value if the nuclear p-gp in saline and 蕩-carrageenan injected animals was equal. Values are the mean + SEM (n = 3 pools of 3 rats each). *** denotes significantly different from control (saline) (p<0.05). The symbols mean: SAL/SAL represents animals with an osmotic minipump filled with 0.9% saline and a 0.9% saline hind paw injection. MOR/SAL represents animals with an osmotic minipump filled with morphine (5 mg/kg/day) in 0.9% saline and a 0.9% saline hind paw injection.</p

    Updated guidance regarding the risk ofAllergic reactions to COVID-19 vaccines and recommended evaluation and management: a GRADE assessment, and international consensus approach.

    No full text
    This guidance updates 2021 GRADE recomendations regarding immediate allergic reactions following COVID-19 vaccines and addresses re-vaccinating individuals with 1st dose allergic reactions and allergy testing to determine re-vaccination outcomes. Recent meta-analyses assessed the incidence of severe allergic reactions to initial COVID-19 vaccination, risk of mRNA-COVID-19 re-vaccination after an initial reaction, and diagnostic accuracy of COVID-19 vaccine and vaccine excipient testing in predicting reactions. GRADE methods informed rating the certainty of evidence and strength of recommenations. A modified Delphi panel consisting of experts in allergy, anaphylaxis, vaccinology, infectious diseases, emergency medicine, and primary care from Australia, Canada, Europe, Japan, South Africa, the UK, and the US formed the recommendations. We recommend vaccination for persons without COVID-19 vaccine excipient allergy, and re-vaccination after a prior immediate allergic reaction. We suggest against >15-minute post-vaccination observation. We recommend against mRNA vaccine or excipient skin testing to predict outcomes. We suggest re-vaccination of persons with an immediate allergic reaction to the mRNA vaccine or excipients be performed by a person with vaccine allergy expertise, in a properly equipped setting. We suggest against pre-medication, split-dosing, or special precautions because of a comorbid allergic history
    corecore