Safety of Adding Oats to a Gluten-free Diet for Patients with Celiac Disease: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Clinical and Observational Studies

Background & Aims: Patients with celiac disease should maintain a gluten-free diet (GFD), excluding wheat, rye, and barley. Oats might increase the nutritional value of a GFD, but their inclusion is controversial. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the safety of oats as part of a GFD in patients with celiac disease. Methods: We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, and EMBASE databases for clinical trials and observational studies of the effects of including oats in GFD of patients with celiac disease. The studies reported patients’ symptoms, results from serology tests, and findings from histologic analyses. We used the GRADE approach to assess the quality of evidence. Results: We identified 433 studies; 28 were eligible for analysis. Of these, 6 were randomized and 2 were not randomized controlled trials comprising a total of 661 patients—the remaining studies were observational. All randomized controlled trials used pure/uncontaminated oats. Oat consumption for 12 months did not affect symptoms (standardized mean difference: reduction in symptom scores in patients who did and did not consume oats, −0.22; 95% CI, −0.56 to 0.13; P = .22), histologic scores (relative risk for histologic findings in patients who consumed oats, 0.24; 95% CI, 0.01–4.8; P = .35), intraepithelial lymphocyte counts (standardized mean difference, 0.21; 95% CI, reduction of 1.44 to increase in 1.86), or results from serologic tests. Subgroup analyses of adults vs children did not reveal differences. The overall quality of evidence was low. Conclusions: In a systematic review and meta-analysis, we found no evidence that addition of oats to a GFD affects symptoms, histology, immunity, or serologic features of patients with celiac disease. However, there were few studies for many endpoints, as well as limited geographic distribution and low quality of evidence. Rigorous double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized controlled trials, using commonly available oats sourced from different regions, are needed

Universal determination of microsatellite instability using BAT26 as a single marker in an Argentine colorectal cancer cohort

Microsatellite instability (MSI) is a hallmark tool for Lynch syndrome (LS) screening and a prognostic marker for sporadic colorectal cancer (CRC). In regions with limited resources and scarce CRC molecular characterization as South America, the implementation of universal MSI screening is under debate for both its purposes. We sought to estimate the frequency of BAT26 in colorectal adenocarcinomas and to determine associated clinical and histological features. Consecutive patients from a CRC registry were included. BAT26 determination was performed in all cases; if instability was found, immunohistochemistry (IHC) and BRAF mutation analyses were done, as appropriate. Differences were assessed by chi-squared or Fisher’s exact test, or by T test or Mann–Whitney. Multiple logistic regression was used to identify factors independently associated with BAT26-unstable tumors. We included 155 patients; mean age was 65.6 (SD 14.4) and 56.1% were male. The frequency of BAT26-unstable tumors was 22% (95% CI 15.7–29.3). Factors independently associated with BAT26-unstable tumors were right colon localization (OR 3.4, 95% CI 1.3–8.7), histological MSI features (OR 5.1, 95% CI 1.9–13.6) and Amsterdam criteria (OR 23.2, 95% CI 1.9–286.7). IHC was altered in 85.3% BAT26-unstable tumors and 70.6% lacked MLH1 expression; 47.8% of these harbored BRAF V600E mutation. We provide evidence to link the frequency of BAT26 to an increased diagnostic yield (up to 1.4-folds) of suspected LS cases in comparison to the revised Bethesda guidelines alone. In regions with limited resources, clinical and histological features associated with BAT26-unstable status could be useful to direct MSI screening in sporadic CRCs and may help guide clinical care and future research.Fil: González, María Laura. Hospital Italiano; ArgentinaFil: Causada Calo, Natalia. Hospital Italiano; Argentina. McMaster University; CanadáFil: Santino, Juan Pablo. Hospital Italiano; ArgentinaFil: Dominguez Valentin, Mev. The Norwegian Radium Hospital; NoruegaFil: Ferro, Fabiana Alejandra. Hospital Italiano; ArgentinaFil: Sammartino, Inés. Hospital Italiano; ArgentinaFil: Kalfayan, Pablo Germán. Hospital Italiano; ArgentinaFil: Verzura, Maria Alicia. Hospital Italiano; ArgentinaFil: Piñero, Tamara Lejandra. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Hospital Italiano; ArgentinaFil: Cajal, Andrea. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Hospital Italiano; ArgentinaFil: Pavicic, Walter Hernan. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Hospital Italiano; ArgentinaFil: Vaccaro, Carlos. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Hospital Italiano; Argentin