109 research outputs found

    Cosmic Microwave Background-Weak Lensing Correlation: Analytical and Numerical Study of Nonlinearity and Implications for Dark Energy

    Get PDF
    Evolution of density fluctuations yields secondary anisotropies in the cosmic microwave background ( CMB), which are correlated with the same density fluctuations that can be measured by weak lensing (WL) surveys. We study the CMB-WL correlation induced by the integrated Sachs-Wolfe (ISW) effect and its nonlinear extension, the Rees-Sciama (RS) effect, using analytical models as well as N-body simulations. We show that an analytical model based on the time derivative of matter power spectrum agrees with simulations. All-sky cosmic-variance-limited CMB and WL surveys allow us to measure the correlation from the nonlinear RS effect with high significance (50 sigma) for l(max) = 10(4) whereas forthcoming missions such as Planck and LSST are expected to yield 4 l p 10 1.5 sigma detections, on the assumption of that the point-source contributions are negligible. We find that the CMB-WL correlation has a characteristic scale which is sensitive to the nature of dark energy.Alfred P. Sloan FellowshipAstronom

    Can Non-Gaussian Cosmological Models Explain the WMAP's High Optical Depth for Reionization?

    Full text link
    The first-year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe data suggest a high optical depth for Thomson scattering of 0.17 +/- 0.04, implying that the universe was reionized at an early epoch, z ~ 20. Such early reionization is likely to be caused by UV photons from first stars, but it appears that the observed high optical depth can be reconciled within the standard structure formation model only if star-formation in the early universe was extremely efficient. With normal star-formation efficiencies, cosmological models with non-Gaussian density fluctuations may circumvent this conflict as high density peaks collapse at an earlier epoch than in models with Gaussian fluctuations. We study cosmic reionization in non-Gaussian models and explore to what extent, within available constraints, non-Gaussianities affect the reionization history. For mild non-Gaussian fluctuations at redshifts of 30 to 50, the increase in optical depth remains at a level of a few percent and appears unlikely to aid significantly in explaining the measured high optical depth. On the other hand, within available observational constraints, increasing the non-Gaussian nature of density fluctuations can easily reproduce the optical depth and may remain viable in underlying models of non-Gaussianity with a scale-dependence.Comment: 5 pages, 2 figure

    Simulations of Early Structure Formation: Primordial Gas Clouds

    Get PDF
    (abridged) We use large cosmological simulations to study the origin of primordial star-forming clouds in a Lambda CDM universe, by following the formation of dark matter halos and the cooling of gas within them. To model the physics of chemically pristine gas, we employ a non-equilibrium treatment of the chemistry of 9 species and include cooling by molecular hydrogen. We explore the hierarchical growth of bound structures forming at redshifts z = 25 - 30 with total masses in the range 10^5 - 10^6 Msun. The complex interplay between the gravitational formation of dark halos and the thermodynamic and chemical evolution of the gas clouds compromises analytic estimates of the critical H2 fraction. Dynamical heating from mass accretion and mergers opposes relatively inefficient cooling by molecular hydrogen, delaying the production of star-forming clouds in rapidly growing halos. We also investigate the impact of photo-dissociating ultra-violet (UV) radiation on the formation of primordial gas clouds. We consider two extreme cases by first including a uniform radiation field in the optically thin limit and secondly by accounting for the maximum effect of gas self-shielding in virialized regions. In both the cases we consider, the overall impact can be described by computing an equilibrium H2 abundance for the radiation flux and defining an effective shielding factor. Based on our numerical results, we develop a semi-analytic model of the formation of the first stars, and demonstrate how it can be coupled with large N-body simulations to predict the star formation rate in the early universe.Comment: Revised version accepted by ApJ. Description of semi-analytic models extende

    Simulations of Wide-Field Weak Lensing Surveys I: Basic Statistics and Non-Gaussian Effects

    Full text link
    We study the lensing convergence power spectrum and its covariance for a standard LCDM cosmology. We run 400 cosmological N-body simulations and use the outputs to perform a total of 1000 independent ray-tracing simulations. We compare the simulation results with analytic model predictions. The semi-analytic model based on Smith et al.(2003) fitting formula underestimates the convergence power by ~30% at arc-minute angular scales. For the convergence power spectrum covariance, the halo model reproduces the simulation results remarkably well over a wide range of angular scales and source redshifts. The dominant contribution at small angular scales comes from the sample variance due to the number fluctuations of halos in a finite survey volume. The signal-to-noise ratio for the convergence power spectrum is degraded by the non-Gaussian covariances by up to a factor 5 for a weak lensing survey to z_s ~1. The probability distribution of the convergence power spectrum estimators, among the realizations, is well approximated by a chi-square distribution with broadened variance given by the non-Gaussian covariance, but has a larger positive tail. The skewness and kurtosis have non-negligible values especially for a shallow survey. We argue that a prior knowledge on the full distribution may be needed to obtain an unbiased estimate on the ensemble averaged band power at each angular scale from a finite volume survey.Comment: 11 pages, 11 figures. Accepted for publication in the Astrophysical Journal. Corrected typo in the equation of survey window function below Equation (18). The results unchange
    corecore