Chemotherapy with low-dose capecitabine as palliative treatment in a patient with metastatic breast cancer: a case report

Chemotherapeutic agents are rarely used for symptom management in patients under palliative care setting. This is because chemotherapeutic agents not only have limited efficacy in palliative treatment but are also known to exert severe adverse effects. We describe our experience with a patient with metastatic breast cancer who was successfully treated with low-dose capecitabine, without the development of any severe toxicities and with significant improvement in activities of daily living (ADL) and quality of life (QOL)

Japanese translation and linguistic validation of the US National Cancer Institute’s Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE)

Abstract Background The US National Cancer Institute (NCI) has developed the Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE) to capture patients’ self-reported symptomatic adverse events in cancer clinical trials. The aim of this study was to develop and linguistically validate a Japanese translation of PRO-CTCAE. Forward- and back-translations were produced, and an independent review was performed by the Japan Clinical Oncology Group (JCOG) Executive Committee and the US NCI. We then conducted cognitive interviews with 21 patients undergoing cancer treatment. Participants were asked to complete the PRO-CTCAE and were interviewed using semi-structured scripts and predetermined probes to investigate whether any items were difficult to understand or answer. The interviews were recorded and transcribed, and a thematic analysis was performed. The data were split into two categories: 1) remarks on the items and 2) remarks on the questionnaire in general. Results Twenty-one cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy or hormone therapy were interviewed at the University of Tokyo Hospital and the Kansai Medical University Hirakata Hospital during 2011 and 2012. Thirty-three PRO-CTCAE items were evaluated as “difficult to understand,” and 65 items were evaluated as “difficult to answer” by at least one respondent. However, on further investigation, only 24 remarks were categorized as “comprehension difficulties” or “clarity” issues. Most of these remarks concerned patients’ difficulties with rating their experience of individual symptomatic events. Conclusions The study provides preliminary evidence supporting the linguistic validity of the Japanese version of PRO-CTCAE. Further cognitive interviewing is warranted for PRO-CTCAE items relating to sexuality and anxiety and for response options on severity attribute items

Genetic and environmental factors and serum hormones, and risk of estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer in pre- and postmenopausal Japanese women

Breast cancer incidence in Japanese women has more than tripled over the past two decades. We have previously shown that this marked increase is mostly due to an increase in the estrogen receptor (ER)-positive, HER2-negative subtype. We conducted a case-control study; ER-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer patients who were diagnosed since 2011 and women without disease were recruited. Environmental factors, serum levels of testosterone and 25-hydroxyvitamin D, and common genetic variants reported as predictors of ER-positive breast cancer or found in Asian women were evaluated between patients and controls in pre-and postmenopausal women. To identify important risk predictors, risk prediction models were created by logistic regression models. In premenopausal women, two environmental factors (history of breastfeeding, and history of benign breast disease) and four genetic variants (TOX3-rs3803662, ESR1-rs2046210, 8q24-rs13281615, and SLC4A7-rs4973768) were considered to be risk predictors, whereas three environmental factors (body mass index, history of breastfeeding, and hyperlipidemia), serum levels of testosterone and 25-hydroxyvitamin D, and two genetic variants (TOX3-rs3803662 and ESR1-rs2046210) were identified as risk predictors. Inclusion of common genetic variants and serum hormone measurements as well as environmental factors improved risk assessment models. The decline in the birthrate according to recent changes of lifestyle might be the main cause of the recent notable increase in the incidence of ER-positive breast cancer in Japanese women

Clinical importance of androgen receptor in breast cancer patients treated with adjuvant tamoxifen monotherapy

Background Despite many studies, the clinicopathological importance of the androgen receptor (AR) in breast cancer is not well established, and its significance as an independent predictor of clinical outcome is controversial. A large and systematic study is needed to address these issues. The aim of the present study was to elucidate whether AR has independent clinical value, examining its importance in a large and well-predefined patient group with a long follow-up period and complete clinicopathological data. Methods Archival materials of 403 invasive breast cancers from women treated with adjuvant tamoxifen monotherapy (median follow-up period 11.0 years) were subjected to immunohistochemical study using anti-AR monoclonal antibody. AR expression was compared with established clinicopathological factors, estrogen receptor (ER)-b expression, and clinical outcome. Results AR positivity was correlated with ER-a positivity, progesterone receptor positivity, ER-b positivity, and a lower nuclear grade. Patients with AR-positive carcinomas exhibited a significantly better clinical outcome than those with AR-negative carcinomas (P = 0.0165 for disease-free survival, P = 0.0344 for overall survival). Multivariate analysis did not yield significant differences in clinical outcome according to the AR status, whereas the ER-b status showed significant differences in multivariate analysis. Conclusions Although, and in agreement with previous reports, AR positivity correlated with some established favorable prognostic factors and with ER-b positivity, AR was not an independent predictor of clinical outcome. Controversy regarding the value of AR as an independent predictor of clinical outcome may at least partly reflect the relatively limited power of AR in breast cancer. © The Japanese Breast Cancer Society 2012

Ki-67 evaluation at the hottest spot predicts clinical outcome of patients with hormone receptor-positive/HER2-negative breast cancer treated with adjuvant tamoxifen monotherapy

© 2013, The Japanese Breast Cancer Society. Background: The clinicopathological importance of Ki-67 in breast cancers has been intensely studied; however, there have been few systematic large studies of patients treated with predefined adjuvant therapy. Further, Ki-67 evaluation methodology differed among studies, which prevents Ki-67 from being used for clinical practice. We performed a large systematic study using routinely processed tissues and compared various scoring methods.Methods: Representative slides of archival tissue blocks of 442 consecutive invasive breast cancers from women treated with adjuvant tamoxifen monotherapy and having a long follow-up period were subjected to immunohistochemistry using anti-Ki-67 monoclonal antibody, Mib-1. Both the average score across the section and the score at the hottest spot were assessed.Results: Ki-67 evaluated at the hottest spot, not the average score across the section, independently predicted poor clinical outcomes of patients with hormone receptor-positive/HER2-negative cancer. Ki-67 was not a predictor of clinical outcome in patients with triple-negative breast cancer. Overall, high Ki-67 level significantly correlated with classic unfavorable clinicopathological factors, correlating negatively with the status of estrogen receptor (ER)-α and progesterone receptor (PR), and positively with HER2 status and grade. ER-β status positively correlated with the Ki-67 level.Conclusions: Ki-67 evaluation at the hottest spot was superior to that determined by average score across the section as a predictor of outcome in patients with hormone receptor-positive/HER2-negative breast cancers treated with endocrine monotherapy. The different result obtained in patients with triple-negative carcinomas needs to be further investigated

Proportion of estrogen or progesterone receptor expressing cells in breast cancers and response to endocrine therapy

© 2014 Elsevier Ltd. Immunohistochemical determination of ER/PR status has been the gold standard in clinical practice of breast cancer for decades. A cut-off of \u271%\u27 is commonly used; however, this is not supported by strict evidence. How the proportion of ER/PR-positive cells influences the response to endocrine therapy has been scarcely reported, either. To address these issues, 486 and 663 invasive breast cancer cases treated with or without adjuvant tamoxifen respectively (median follow-up period, 12.8 years) were enrolled, and effect of tamoxifen treatment was compared among ER/PR-positive or -negative groups immunohistochemically determined using various cut-offs. Tamoxifen significantly improved 5 years disease-free survival in ER/PR-positive, but not in ER/PR-negative, cases even using immunohistochemical \u3e0% cut-off. Cases with ≥67% ER/PR expressing cells responded to tamoxifen by far the best. Patients having tumors without any ER/PR-positive cells should be excluded from endocrine therapy, whereas this therapy should be strongly recommended for those with ≥67% ER/PR-positive cells