Practice Patterns and Preferences Among Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Clinicians

Hematopoietic cell transplantation can cure many high-risk diseases but is associated with complexity, cost, and risk. Several areas in transplantation practice were identified in the 2014 Blood and Marrow Transplant Clinical Trials Network State of the Science Symposium (BMT CTN SOSS) as high priorities for further study. We developed a survey for hematopoietic cell transplantation clinicians to identify current practices in BMT CTN SOSS priority areas and to understand, more generally, the variation in approach to transplantation and estimation of transplantation benefit in current medical practice. Of 1439 transplantation clinicians surveyed, 305 responded (20% response rate). Clinicians were well represented by age, experience, geography, and size of practice. We found that several techniques identified in the BMT CTN SOSS, such as maintenance therapy for acute myeloid leukemia or myelodysplastic syndromes after allogeneic transplantation, were already being utilized in practice on and off study, with higher rates of use in higher-volume centers. There was significant variation among clinicians in use of transplantation technologies and approaches to common transplantation scenarios. Appraisals of risks and benefits of transplantation appeared to converge upon similar estimates despite the presentation of different hypothetical scenarios. These results suggest overall equipoise in several BMT CTN SOSS high-priority areas and support the need for better data to inform clinical practice

Measuring the impact of ambulatory red blood cell transfusion on home functional status: study protocol for a pilot randomized controlled trial

SPIRIT 2013: SPIRIT (Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials) Checklist for clinical trial protocols. (DOCX 65 kb

A Randomized Phase II Crossover Study of Imatinib or Rituximab for Cutaneous Sclerosis after Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation

Cutaneous sclerosis (CS) occurs in 20% of patients with chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) and can compromise mobility and quality of life

Comparing Outcomes with Bone Marrow or Peripheral Blood Stem Cells as Graft Source for Matched Sibling Transplants in Severe Aplastic Anemia across Different Economic Regions

Bone marrow (BM) is the preferred graft source for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in severe aplastic anemia (SAA) compared to mobilized peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC). We hypothesized that this recommendation may not apply to those regions where patients present later in their disease course, with heavier transfusion load and with higher graft failure rates. Patients with SAA who received HSCT from an HLA-matched sibling donor from 1995 to 2009 and reported to the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research or the Japan Society for Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation were analyzed. The study population was categorized by gross national income per capita (GNI) and region/countries into four groups. Groups analyzed were high income countries (HIC), which were further divided into US-Canada (N=486) and other HIC (N=1264), upper middle-income (UMIC) (N=482), and combined lower middle, low income countries (LM-LIC) (N=142). In multivariate analysis, overall survival (OS) was highest with BM as graft source in HIC compared to PBSC in all countries or BM in UMIC or LM-LIC (p<0.001). There was no significant difference in OS between BM and PBSC in UMIC (p=0.32) or LM-LIC (p=0.23). In LM-LIC the 28-day neutrophil engraftment was higher with PBSC compared to BM (97% vs. 77%, p<0.001). Chronic GVHD was significantly higher with PBSC in all groups. Whereas BM should definitely be the preferred graft source for HLA-matched sibling HSCT in SAA, PBSC may be an acceptable alternative in countries with limited resources when treating patients at high risk of graft failure and infective complications

Comparison of Characteristics and Outcomes of Trial Participants and Nonparticipants: Example of Blood and Marrow Transplant Clinical Trials Network 0201 Trial

Controversy surrounds the question of whether clinical trial participants have better outcomes than comparable patients who are not treated on a trial. We explored this question using a recent large, randomized, multi-center study comparing peripheral blood (PB) with bone marrow (BM) transplantation from unrelated donors (URD), conducted by the Blood and Marrow Transplant Clinical Trials Network (BMT CTN)

Outcomes of haploidentical vs matched sibling transplantation for acute myeloid leukemia in first complete remission.

HLA-haploidentical hematopoietic cell transplantation (Haplo-HCT) using posttransplantation cyclophosphamide (PT-Cy) has improved donor availability. However, a matched sibling donor (MSD) is still considered the optimal donor. Using the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research database, we compared outcomes after Haplo-HCT vs MSD in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in first complete remission (CR1). Data from 1205 adult CR1 AML patients (2008-2015) were analyzed. A total of 336 patients underwent PT-Cy–based Haplo-HCT and 869 underwent MSD using calcineurin inhibitor–based graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis. The Haplo-HCT group included more reduced-intensity conditioning (65% vs 30%) and bone marrow grafts (62% vs 7%), consistent with current practice. In multivariable analysis, Haplo-HCT and MSD groups were not different with regard to overall survival (P 5 .15), leukemia-free survival (P 5 .50), nonrelapse mortality (P 5 .16), relapse (P 5 .90), or grade II-IV acute GVHD (P 5 .98). However, the Haplo-HCT group had a significantly lower rate of chronic GVHD (hazard ratio, 0.38; 95% confidence interval, 0.30-0.48; P, .001). Results of subgroup analyses by conditioning intensity and graft source suggested that the reduced incidence of chronic GVHD in Haplo-HCT is not limited to a specific graft source or conditioning intensity. Center effect and minimal residual disease–donor type interaction were not predictors of outcome. Our results indicate a lower rate of chronic GVHD after PT-Cy–based Haplo-HCT vs MSD using calcineurin inhibitor–based GVHD prophylaxis, but similar other outcomes, in patients with AML in CR1. Haplo-HCT is a viable alternative to MSD in these patients. © 2019 American Society of Hematology. All rights reserved

Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for Blastic Plasmacytoid Dendritic Cell Neoplasm: A CIBMTR Analysis

Blastic plasmacytoid dendritic cell neoplasm (BPDCN) is a rare hematological malignancy with a poor prognosis and considered incurable with conventional chemotherapy. Small observational studies reported allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) offers durable remissions in patients with BPDCN. We report an analysis of patients with BPDCN who received an allo-HCT, using data reported to the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR). We identified 164 patients with BPDCN from 78 centers who underwent allo-HCT between 2007 and 2018. The 5-year overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), relapse, and nonrelapse mortality (NRM) rates were 51.2% (95% confidence interval [CI], 42.5-59.8), 44.4% (95% CI, 36.2-52.8), 32.2% (95% CI, 24.7-40.3), and 23.3% (95% CI, 16.9-30.4), respectively. Disease relapse was the most common cause of death. On multivariate analyses, age of ≥60 years was predictive for inferior OS (hazard ratio [HR], 2.16; 95% CI, 1.35-3.46; P = .001), and higher NRM (HR, 2.19; 95% CI, 1.13-4.22; P = .02). Remission status at time of allo-HCT (CR2/primary induction failure/relapse vs CR1) was predictive of inferior OS (HR, 1.87; 95% CI, 1.14-3.06; P = .01) and DFS (HR, 1.75; 95% CI, 1.11-2.76; P = .02). Use of myeloablative conditioning with total body irradiation (MAC-TBI) was predictive of improved DFS and reduced relapse risk. Allo-HCT is effective in providing durable remissions and long-term survival in BPDCN. Younger age and allo-HCT in CR1 predicted for improved survival, whereas MAC-TBI predicted for less relapse and improved DFS. Novel strategies incorporating allo-HCT are needed to further improve outcomes

Costs of second allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation

Thesis (Master's)--University of Washington, 2012Graft failure, disease recurrence and secondary malignancy are the main indications for a second allogeneic transplant following a prior allogeneic (allo-allo) or autologous (auto-allo) hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). Reported outcomes are generally poor, especially for the allo-allo group. The role of planned tandem auto-allo transplants for myeloma and lymphoma is continuing to evolve. Our objective was to describe the cost profile of second HCT and evaluate the relationship between total costs, baseline patient characteristics and post-transplant complications. Clinical information and medical costs of 245 patients (allo-allo: 55, auto-allo: 190) who underwent a second HCT at Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center between 2004 and 2010 were collected. Linear regression was used to evaluate the associations between baseline patient characteristics, clinical events and costs for the first 100 days after transplantation. Median costs of the second allogeneic HCT were $151,000 (range$62,000-405,000) for the allo-allo group and $109,000 (range$26,000-490,000) for the auto-allo; there was no difference between the costs in the auto-allo group whether done as a planned tandem or as salvage for relapse. Median length of hospital stay was 23 days (range 0 - 76) for the allo-allo group and 9 days (range 0-96) for the auto-allo group. While HCT for graft failure in the allo-allo group and the use of myeloablative conditioning and unrelated or mismatched donors emerged as a significant predictor of costs in the auto-allo group when only pre-transplantation variables were considered, the year of transplant and post-transplant complications were significantly associated with costs in both groups when the post-transplant events were added to the model. Our results suggest that second allogeneic HCT is costly, particularly if it follows a prior allogeneic transplant, and is driven by the costs of complications