Microbial analysis of in situ biofilm formation in drinking water distribution systems: implications for monitoring and control of drinking water quality.

Biofilm formation in drinking water distribution systems (DWDS) is influenced by the source water, the supply infrastructure and the operation of the system. A holistic approach was used to advance knowledge on the development of mixed species biofilms in situ, by using biofilm sampling devices installed in chlorinated networks. Key physico-chemical parameters and conventional microbial indicators for drinking water quality were analysed. Biofilm coverage on pipes was evaluated by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM). The microbial community structure, bacteria and fungi, of water and biofilms was assessed using pyrosequencing. Conventional wisdom leads to an expectation for less microbial diversity in groundwater supplied systems. However, the analysis of bulk water showed higher microbial diversity in groundwater site samples compared with the surface water site. Conversely, higher diversity and richness were detected in biofilms from the surface water site. The average biofilm coverage was similar among sites. Disinfection residual and other key variables were similar between the two sites, other than nitrates, alkalinity and the hydraulic conditions which were extremely low at the groundwater site. Thus, the unexpected result of an exceptionally low diversity with few dominant genera (Pseudomonas and Basidiobolus) in groundwater biofilm samples, despite the more diverse community in the bulk water, is attributed to the low-flow hydraulic conditions. This finding evidences that the local environmental conditions are shaping biofilm formation, composition and amount, and hence managing these is critical for the best operation of DWDS to safeguard water quality

AUTOTRANSFUSION OF POTENTIALLY CULTURE-POSITIVE BLOOD (CPB) IN ABDOMINAL-TRAUMA - PRELIMINARY DATA FROM A PROSPECTIVE-STUDY

Increased use of autotransfusion for traumatic hemorrhage may reduce amounts of banked blood needed for severe injuries. Autotransfusion is standard for traumatic hemothorax, but has been limited for abdominal injuries. This prospective study used microbiologic data from 152 patients with intestinal injuries. Where anticipated blood loss was > 1,000 mL, blood from the peritoneal cavity was cultured, washed, concentrated, and recultured before reinfusion. Infection rates were stratified using the Penetrating Abdominal Trauma Index (PATI). Fifty patients with PATI > 20 who received banked blood (group I) (mean: 1,800 mL) were compared with 20 patients (group II) who received autotransfused, potentially culture-positive blood (CPB) (mean: 3,900 mL). Wound infection rates were identical in both groups (25%). No statistically significant increase was found in site-specific infection risk when severity of injury was stratified according to PATI. Bacteremias, pulmonary infections, and urinary infections were not caused by bacteria cultured from autotransfused blood. We conclude that washed CPB may be autotransfused without significantly increased risk of infection in patients with severe abdominal injuries

PROSPECTIVE ALTERATIONS IN THERAPY FOR PENETRATING ABDOMINAL-TRAUMA

In a double-blind, randomized study, 170 patients with traumatic perforation of the gastrointestinal tract were administered an advanced-generation cephalosporin. Patients were divided into infection risk groups (less-than-or-equal-to 40%, low; 40% to 70%, mid; and >70%, high) at surgical closure using a logistic regression formula based on four proved risk factors-age, blood replacement, ostomy, and the number of organs injured. Patients in the low group received 2 days of antibiotic therapy; those in the mid to high group received 5 days of antibiotic therapy. Those patients in the low to mid group had primary wound closure; those in the high group had their wounds packed open and closed later. Most of the patients (144 [85%]) were in the low group. Their major and minor infection rates (10% and 12%, respectively) were not significantly different from 145 historic control subjects receiving 5 days of antibiotic therapy (9% major; 14% minor). Patients in the mid to high group showed a greater incidence of major infections (46%) but a similar incidence of minor infections (12%). The results indicate that risk factors can be used to identify low-risk patients who require only short-term antibiotic therapy and primary wound closure. The remaining patients are at greater risk for infection despite prolonged antibiotic therapy and delayed wound closure