15 research outputs found
Modern literature
This chapter has seven sections 1. General; 2. Pre-1945 Fiction; 3. Post-1945 Fiction; 4. Pre-1950 Drama; 5. Post-1950 Drama; 6. British Poetry 1900â1930. 7. Irish Poetry. Section 1 is by Aaron Jaffe; section 2(a) is by Andrew Radford; section 2(b) is by Sam Slote; section 2(c) is by Eric Sandberg; section 3 is by Nick Bentley; section 4 is by Rebecca DâMonte; section 5 is by Graham Saunders; section 6 is by Matthew Creasy; section 7 is by Maria Johnston
Modern literature
This chapter has seven sections 1. General; 2 Pre-1945 Fiction; 3. Post-1945 Fiction; 4 Pre-1950 Drama; 5 Post-1950 Drama; 6. Pre-1950 Poetry. 7. Modern Irish Poetry. Section 1 is by Aaron Jaffe; section 2(a) is by Andrew Radford; section 2(b) is by Mary Grover; section 2(c) is by Sam Slote; section 2(d) is by Andrew Harrison; section 2(e) is by Bryony Randall; section 3 is by Nick Bentley; section 4 is by Rebecca DâMonte; section 5 is by Graham Saunders; section 6 is by Matthew Creasy; section 7 is by Maria Johnston
Modern literature
This chapter has seven sections: 1. General; 2. Pre-1945 Fiction; 3. Post-1945 Fiction; 4. Pre-1950 Drama; 5. Post-1950 Drama; 6. Pre-1950 Poetry; 7. Irish Poetry. Section 1 is by Aaron Jaffe; section 2(a) is by Andrew Radford; section 2(b) is by Mary Grover; section 2(c) is by Andrew Harrison; section 2(d) is by Bryony Randall; section 3 is by Nick Bentley; section 4 is by Rebecca DâMontĂ©; section 5 is by Graham Saunders; section 6 is by Matthew Creasy; section 7 is by Justin Quinn. The sections on James Joyce and post-1950 poetry have been omitted this year. Publications from 2007 in these areas will be reviewed in YWES 89
Modern literature
This chapter has eight sections: 1. General; 2. Pre-1945 Fiction; 3. Post-1945 Fiction; 4. Pre-1950 Drama; 5. Post-1950 Drama; 6. Pre-1950 Poetry; 7. Post-1950 Poetry; 8. Irish Poetry. Section 1 is by Aaron Jaffe; section 2(a) is by Andrew Radford; section 2(b) is by Chris Hopkins; section 2(c) is by Anne Fogarty; section 2(d) is by Andrew Harrison; section 2(e) is by Lisa Shahriari; section 3 is by Nick Bentley; section 4 is by Rebecca D'monte; section 5 is by Aleks Sierz; section 6 is by Matthew Creasy; section 7 is by Peter Barry; section 8 is by Justin Quinn
Investigation of the constitutive proteins of brain structures by electrophoresis in a continuous polyacrylamide gel gradient in capillary tubes
Contesting the Unethical City: Land Dispossession and Corruption Narratives in Urban India
Backshoring, local sweatshop regimes and CSR in India
Deploying an approach to chain analysis concerned with regional differentiation and backshoring, this article investigates the regional complexities of the garment commodity chain in India and its multiple local sweatshop regimes to illustrate the limitations of corporate social responsibility (CSR) norms. First, the article shows that India's distinctively regional organization of production and product specialization, arising from different local historical legacies of production, reproduces labour outcomes that prevent the effectiveness of CSR. Second, it shows that the backshoring practices used by a powerful group of Pan-Indian buyer-exporters, who increasingly behave like global buyers, further reproduce the logic of the local sweatshop, hence reinforcing the limitations of corporate approaches to labour standards
From London to Mumbai and Back Again: Gentrification and Public Policy in Comparative Perspective
Gentrification has become a global phenomenon over the past 15 years and has been understood as an increasingly important strategy within neo-liberal policy-making. Focusing on London and Mumbai, this paper details how public policies and planning regimes have been reconfigured and rescaled to facilitate and encourage new property speculation. However, against more generalised and abstract accounts of the neo-liberal city, the paper uses its comparative perspective to emphasise the geographically and historically specific manifestations and effects of gentrification processes. By highlighting different forms of state intervention and sharper socio-spatial impacts in Mumbai, the paper challenges the Eurocentric framing of a global spread of gentrification and argues that Mumbai can act as an important source of learning for gentrification research