Influence of Empiric Therapy with a β-Lactam Alone or Combined with an Aminoglycoside on Prognosis of Bacteremia Due to Gram-Negative Microorganisms▿

Evidence supporting the combination of aminoglycosides with β-lactams for Gram-negative bacteremia is inconclusive. We have explored the influence on survival of empirical therapy with a β-lactam alone versus that with a β-lactam-aminoglycoside combination by retrospectively analyzing a series of bacteremic episodes due to aerobic or facultative Gram-negative microorganisms treated with single or combination therapy. The outcome variable was a 30-day mortality. Prognostic factors were selected by regression logistic analysis. A total of 4,863 episodes were assessed, of which 678 (14%) received combination therapy and 467 (10%) were fatal. Factors independently associated with mortality included age greater than 65 (odds ratio [OR], 2; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.6 to 2.6), hospital acquisition (OR, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.2 to 1.9), a rapidly or ultimately fatal underlying disease (OR, 2.5; 95% CI, 2 to 3.2), cirrhosis (OR, 1.9; 95% CI, 1.4 to 2.6), prior corticosteroids (OR, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.1 to 2), shock on presentation (OR, 8.8; 95% CI, 7 to 11), pneumonia (OR, 2.8; 95% CI, 1.9 to 4), and inappropriate empirical therapy (OR, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.3 to 2.5). Subgroup analysis revealed that combination therapy was an independent protective factor in episodes presenting shock (OR, 0.6; 95% CI, 0.4 to 0.9) or neutropenia (OR, 0.5; 95% CI, 0.3 to 0.9). Combination therapy improved the appropriateness of empirical therapy in episodes due to extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)- or AmpC-producing Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. In patients with Gram-negative bacteremia, we could not find an overall association between empirical β-lactam-aminoglycoside combination therapy and prognosis. However, a survival advantage cannot be discarded for episodes presenting shock or neutropenia, hence in these situations the use of combination therapy may still be justified. Combination therapy also should be considered for patients at risk of being infected with resistant organisms, if only to increase the appropriateness of empirical therapy

A prospective multicentre study of the epidemiology and outcomes of bloodstream infection in cirrhotic patients

Objectives: To describe the current epidemiology of bloodstream infection (BSI) in patients with cirrhosis; and to analyse predictors of 30-day mortality and risk factors for antibiotic resistance. Methods: Cirrhotic patients developing a BSI episode were prospectively included at 19 centres in five countries from September 2014 to December 2015. The discrimination of mortality risk scores for 30-day mortality were compared by area under the receiver operator risk and Cox regression models. Risk factors for multidrug-resistant organisms (MDRO) were assessed with a logistic regression model. Results: We enrolled 312 patients. Gram-negative bacteria, Gram-positive bacteria and Candida spp. were the cause of BSI episodes in 53%, 47% and 7% of cases, respectively. The 30-day mortality rate was 25% and was best predicted by the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) and Chronic Liver Failure-SOFA (CLIF-SOFA) score. In a Cox regression model, delayed (>24 hours) antibiotic treatment (hazard ratio (HR) 7.58; 95% confidence interval (CI) 3.29-18.67; p < 0.001), inadequate empirical therapy (HR 3.14; 95% CI 1.93-5.12; p < 0.001) and CLIF-SOFA score (HR 1.35; 95% CI 1.28-1.43; p < 0.001) were independently associated with 30-day mortality. Independent risk factors for MDRO (31% of BSIs) were previous antimicrobial exposure (odds ratio (OR) 2.91; 95% CI 1.73-4.88; p < 0.001) and previous invasive procedures (OR 2.51; 95% CI 1.48-4.24; p 0.001), whereas spontaneous bacterial peritonitis as BSI source was associated with a lower odds of MDRO (OR 0.30; 95% CI 0.12-0.73; p 0.008). Conclusions: MDRO account for nearly one-third of BSI in cirrhotic patients, often resulting in delayed or inadequate empirical antimicrobial therapy and increased mortality rates. Our data suggest that improved prevention and treatment strategies for MDRO are urgently needed in the liver cirrhosis patients. (C) 2017 European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved

A prospective multicentre study of the epidemiology and outcomes of bloodstream infection in cirrhotic patients

ESGBIS/BICHROME Study Group: C. Campoli, G. Siccardi, S. Ambretti, A. Stallmach, M. Venditti, C. Lucidi, S. Ludovisi, M. De Cueto, M. D. Navarro, E. Lopez Cortes, E. Bouza, M. Valerio, A. Eworo, R. Losito, M. Senzolo, E. Nadal, A. Ottobrelli, M. Varguvic, C. Badia, G. Borgia, I. Gentile, A. R. Buonomo, E. Boumis, A. Beteta-Lopez, A. Rianda, G. Taliani, S. Grieco.[Objectives] To describe the current epidemiology of bloodstream infection (BSI) in patients with cirrhosis; and to analyse predictors of 30-day mortality and risk factors for antibiotic resistance.[Methods] Cirrhotic patients developing a BSI episode were prospectively included at 19 centres in five countries from September 2014 to December 2015. The discrimination of mortality risk scores for 30-day mortality were compared by area under the receiver operator risk and Cox regression models. Risk factors for multidrug-resistant organisms (MDRO) were assessed with a logistic regression model.[Results] We enrolled 312 patients. Gram-negative bacteria, Gram-positive bacteria and Candida spp. were the cause of BSI episodes in 53%, 47% and 7% of cases, respectively. The 30-day mortality rate was 25% and was best predicted by the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) and Chronic Liver Failure–SOFA (CLIF-SOFA) score. In a Cox regression model, delayed (>24 hours) antibiotic treatment (hazard ratio (HR) 7.58; 95% confidence interval (CI) 3.29–18.67; p < 0.001), inadequate empirical therapy (HR 3.14; 95% CI 1.93–5.12; p < 0.001) and CLIF-SOFA score (HR 1.35; 95% CI 1.28–1.43; p < 0.001) were independently associated with 30-day mortality. Independent risk factors for MDRO (31% of BSIs) were previous antimicrobial exposure (odds ratio (OR) 2.91; 95% CI 1.73–4.88; p < 0.001) and previous invasive procedures (OR 2.51; 95% CI 1.48–4.24; p 0.001), whereas spontaneous bacterial peritonitis as BSI source was associated with a lower odds of MDRO (OR 0.30; 95% CI 0.12–0.73; p 0.008).[Conclusions] MDRO account for nearly one-third of BSI in cirrhotic patients, often resulting in delayed or inadequate empirical antimicrobial therapy and increased mortality rates. Our data suggest that improved prevention and treatment strategies for MDRO are urgently needed in the liver cirrhosis patients