17 research outputs found

    The influence of interviewers on survey responses among female sex workers in Zambia

    Get PDF
    Background: Interviewers can substantially affect self-reported data. This may be due to random variation in interviewers’ ability to put respondents at ease or in how they frame questions. It may also be due to systematic differences such as social distance between interviewer and respondent (e.g., by age, gender, ethnicity) or different perceptions of what interviewers consider socially desirable responses. Exploration of such variation is limited, especially in stigmatized populations. Methods: We analyzed data from a randomized controlled trial of HIV self-testing amongst 965 female sex workers (FSWs) in Zambian towns. In the trial, 16 interviewers were randomly assigned to respondents. We used hierarchical regression models to examine how interviewers may both affect responses on more and less sensitive topics, and confound associations between key risk factors and HIV self-test use. Results: Model variance (ICC) at the interviewer level was over 15% for most topics. ICC was lower for socio-demographic and cognitively simple questions, and highest for sexual behaviour, substance use, violence and psychosocial wellbeing questions. Respondents reported significantly lower socioeconomic status and more sex-work related violence to female interviewers. Not accounting for interviewer identity in regressions predicting HIV self-test behaviour led to coefficients moving from non-significant to significant. Conclusions We found substantial interviewer-level effects for prevalence and associational outcomes among Zambian FSWs, particularly for sensitive questions. Our findings highlight the importance of careful training and response monitoring to minimize inter-interviewer variation, of considering social distance when selecting interviewers and of evaluating whether interviewers are driving key findings in self-reported data. Trial registration: clinicaltrials.gov; NCT02827240. Registered 11 July 2016

    Acceptability of HIV self-testing to support pre-exposure prophylaxis among female sex workers in Uganda and Zambia: results from two randomized controlled trials

    Get PDF
    Background: HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is highly effective for prevention of HIV acquisition, but requires HIV testing at regular intervals. Female sex workers (FSWs) are a priority population for HIV prevention interventions in many settings, but face barriers to accessing healthcare. Here, we assessed the acceptability of HIV self-testing for regular HIV testing during PrEP implementation among FSWs participating in a randomized controlled trial of HIV self-testing delivery models. Methods: We used data from two HIV self-testing randomized controlled trials with identical protocols in Zambia and in Uganda. From September–October 2016, participants were randomized in groups to: (1) direct delivery of an HIV self-test, (2) delivery of a coupon, exchangeable for an HIV self-test at nearby health clinics, or (3) standard HIV testing services. Participants completed assessments at baseline and 4 weeks. Participants reporting their last HIV test was negative were asked about their interest in various PrEP modalities and their HIV testing preferences. We used mixed effects logistic regression models to measure differences in outcomes across randomization arms at four weeks. Results: At 4 weeks, 633 participants in Zambia and 749 participants in Uganda reported testing negative at their last HIV test. The majority of participants in both studies were “very interested” in daily oral PrEP (91% Zambia; 66% Uganda) and preferred HIV self-testing to standard testing services while on PrEP (87% Zambia; 82% Uganda). Participants in the HIV self-testing intervention arms more often reported preference for HIV self-testing compared to standard testing services to support PrEP in both Zambia (P = 0.002) and Uganda (P < 0.001). Conclusion: PrEP implementation programs for FSW could consider inclusion of HIV self-testing to reduce the clinic-based HIV testing burden. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02827240 and NCT02846402

    Standardization of Clinical Assessment and Sample Collection Across All PERCH Study Sites.

    Get PDF
    BACKGROUND.: Variable adherence to standardized case definitions, clinical procedures, specimen collection techniques, and laboratory methods has complicated the interpretation of previous multicenter pneumonia etiology studies. To circumvent these problems, a program of clinical standardization was embedded in the Pneumonia Etiology Research for Child Health (PERCH) study. METHODS.: Between March 2011 and August 2013, standardized training on the PERCH case definition, clinical procedures, and collection of laboratory specimens was delivered to 331 clinical staff at 9 study sites in 7 countries (The Gambia, Kenya, Mali, South Africa, Zambia, Thailand, and Bangladesh), through 32 on-site courses and a training website. Staff competency was assessed throughout 24 months of enrollment with multiple-choice question (MCQ) examinations, a video quiz, and checklist evaluations of practical skills. RESULTS.: MCQ evaluation was confined to 158 clinical staff members who enrolled PERCH cases and controls, with scores obtained for >86% of eligible staff at each time-point. Median scores after baseline training were ≄80%, and improved by 10 percentage points with refresher training, with no significant intersite differences. Percentage agreement with the clinical trainer on the presence or absence of clinical signs on video clips was high (≄89%), with interobserver concordance being substantial to high (AC1 statistic, 0.62-0.82) for 5 of 6 signs assessed. Staff attained median scores of >90% in checklist evaluations of practical skills. CONCLUSIONS.: Satisfactory clinical standardization was achieved within and across all PERCH sites, providing reassurance that any etiological or clinical differences observed across the study sites are true differences, and not attributable to differences in application of the clinical case definition, interpretation of clinical signs, or in techniques used for clinical measurements or specimen collection

    The Zambian Peer Educators for HIV Self-Testing (ZEST) Study: A randomized controlled trial of HIV self-test provision for female sex workers in Zambia

    No full text
    Background: HIV testing is the critical first step for realization of the 90-90-90 targets, which aim to have 90% of people living with HIV aware of their status, 90% of those linked to care, and 90% of those virally suppressed. However, HIV testing among female sex workers (FSWs) in sub-Saharan Africa remains below the 90% target. The objective of this study was thus to evaluate 1) the effectiveness of HIV self-test provision compared to standard of care HIV testing for increasing HIV testing coverage among FSW and 2) the effectiveness of two delivery models for HIV self-test provision. Methods: This study was a cluster randomized trial conducted in three transit towns in Zambia: Livingstone, Chirundu, and Kapiri Mposhi. FSWs were recruited by a peer educator. FSW-peer educator groups were randomized in a 1:1:1 ratio to one of three groups: 1) standard-of-care, which consisted of referral to existing HIV testing facilities 2) direct delivery of an HIV self-test kit from the peer educator to the participant or 3) distribution of a coupon from the peer educator, which could be used to collect an HIV self-test kit at a participating distribution point. Results: At one month, 94.9% and 84.4% of participants in the delivery and coupon arms reported testing for the past month, compared to 88.5% in the standard-of-care arm. Participants in the delivery arm were significantly more likely to report testing for HIV in the past month compared to the coupon arm but not compared with standard of care (Direct vs SOC: RR 1.07, P=0.29, Coupon vs SOC: RR 1.05 P=0.10, Direct vs Coupon RR 1.13, P=0.005). At four months, 84.1%, 79.8%, and 75.1% of participants reported testing for HIV in the past month in the delivery, coupon, and standard-of-care arms. There were no statistically significant differences in HIV testing at four months. Conclusion: Although HIV self-testing did not increase HIV testing, high reported use of HIV self-tests indicate that it is acceptable to FSWs in Zambia. Although directly providing the HIV self-test may increase use in the short-term, delivery models utilizing distribution via existing distribution points (e.g., clinics or pharmacies) will likely be successful in distributing kits
    corecore