9 research outputs found
On fighting for global justice: the role of a Third World international lawyer
No full text10.1080/01436597.2016.1180955Third World Quarterly37111972-198
China, India, and International Law: A Justice Based Vision Between the Romantic and Realist Perceptions
No full text
Throwing the Baby Out with the Bathwater: Australia’s New Policy on Treaty-Based Investor-State Arbitration and its Impact in Asia
No full textIs Investment Arbitration an Appropriate Venue for Environmental Issues? A Latin American Perspective
No full textRegulating the Multinational Enterprise as Entity, as a Network of Links and as a Process of Production
No full textNineteen Eighty Three: A Jurisographic Report on Commonwealth v Tasmania
No full textThe question we ask in this essay is quite direct: did the Tasmanian Dams case change the conduct of jurisprudence in Australia? To reflect on that question, we stand to the side of the review of the events of 1983 as constitutional decision, and present the jurisprudence of Dams and 1983 in terms of the incidents of legal thinking in the conduct of the office of the jurisprudent. Writing as jurisographers, we reflect historically on the conduct of office of the jurist and jurisprudent, and the writing of jurisprudence. Our account here provides a brief chronicle and record of the patchwork of law projects and engagements that pattern the events of Dams into the scholarly work of jurists in Australian universities
