Protocol: precision engineering of plant gene loci by homologous recombination cloning in Escherichia coli.

Plant genome sequence data now provide opportunities to conduct molecular genetic studies at the level of the whole gene locus and above. Such studies will be greatly facilitated by adopting and developing further the new generation of genetic engineering tools, based on homologous recombination cloning in Escherichia coli, which are free from the constraints imposed by the availability of suitably positioned restriction sites. Here we describe the basis for homologous recombination cloning in E. coli, the available tools and resources, together with a protocol for long range cloning and manipulation of an Arabidopsis thaliana gene locus, to create constructs co-ordinately driven by locus-specific regulatory elements.RIGHTS : This article is licensed under the BioMed Central licence at http://www.biomedcentral.com/about/license which is similar to the 'Creative Commons Attribution Licence'. In brief you may : copy, distribute, and display the work; make derivative works; or make commercial use of the work - under the following conditions: the original author must be given credit; for any reuse or distribution, it must be made clear to others what the license terms of this work are

A new RNASeq-based reference transcriptome for sugar beet and its application in transcriptome-scale analysis of vernalization and gibberellin responses.

BACKGROUND: Sugar beet (Beta vulgaris sp. vulgaris) crops account for about 30% of world sugar. Sugar yield is compromised by reproductive growth hence crops must remain vegetative until harvest. Prolonged exposure to cold temperature (vernalization) in the range 6 °C to 12 °C induces reproductive growth, leading to bolting (rapid elongation of the main stem) and flowering. Spring cultivation of crops in cool temperate climates makes them vulnerable to vernalization and hence bolting, which is initiated in the apical shoot meristem in processes involving interaction between gibberellin (GA) hormones and vernalization. The underlying mechanisms are unknown and genome scale next generation sequencing approaches now offer comprehensive strategies to investigate them; enabling the identification of novel targets for bolting control in sugar beet crops. In this study, we demonstrate the application of an mRNA-Seq based strategy for this purpose. RESULTS: There is no sugar beet reference genome, or public expression array platforms. We therefore used RNA-Seq to generate the first reference transcriptome. We next performed digital gene expression profiling using shoot apex mRNA from two sugar beet cultivars with and without applied GA, and also a vernalized cultivar with and without applied GA. Subsequent bioinformatics analyses identified transcriptional changes associated with genotypic difference and experimental treatments. Analysis of expression profiles in response to vernalization and GA treatment suggested previously unsuspected roles for a RAV1-like AP2/B3 domain protein in vernalization and efflux transporters in the GA response. CONCLUSIONS: Next generation RNA-Seq enabled the generation of the first reference transcriptome for sugar beet and the study of global transcriptional responses in the shoot apex to vernalization and GA treatment, without the need for a reference genome or established array platforms. Comprehensive bioinformatic analysis identified transcriptional programmes associated with different sugar beet genotypes as well as biological treatments; thus providing important new opportunities for basic scientists and sugar beet breeders. Transcriptome-scale identification of agronomically important traits as used in this study should be widely applicable to all crop plants where genomic resources are limiting.RIGHTS : This article is licensed under the BioMed Central licence at http://www.biomedcentral.com/about/license which is similar to the 'Creative Commons Attribution Licence'. In brief you may : copy, distribute, and display the work; make derivative works; or make commercial use of the work - under the following conditions: the original author must be given credit; for any reuse or distribution, it must be made clear to others what the license terms of this work are

Bolting and flowering control in sugar beet: relationships and effects of gibberellin, the bolting gene B and vernalization

Using a co-dominant genotypic PCR marker we show for the first time that, in sugar beet, the GA and B-gene pathways are independent for bolt initiation. We show that vernalization permits GA-dependant stem elongation and that the B-allele influences subsequent flowering

A contiguous de novo genome assembly of sugar beet EL10 (Beta vulgaris L.)

A contiguous assembly of the inbred ‘EL10’ sugar beet (Beta vulgaris ssp. vulgaris) genome was constructed using PacBio long-read sequencing, BioNano optical mapping, Hi-C scaffolding, and Illumina short-read error correction. The EL10.1 assembly was 540 Mb, of which 96.2% was contained in nine chromosome-sized pseudomolecules with lengths from 52 to 65 Mb, and 31 contigs with a median size of 282 kb that remained unassembled. Gene annotation incorporating RNA-seq data and curated sequences via the MAKER annotation pipeline generated 24,255 gene models. Results indicated that the EL10.1 genome assembly is a contiguous genome assembly highly congruent with the published sugar beet reference genome. Gross duplicate gene analyses of EL10.1 revealed little large-scale intra-genome duplication. Reduced gene copy number for well-annotated gene families relative to other core eudicots was observed, especially for transcription factors. Variation in genome size in B. vulgaris was investigated by flow cytometry among 50 individuals producing estimates from 633 to 875 Mb/1C. Read-depth mapping with short-read whole-genome sequences from other sugar beet germplasm suggested that relatively few regions of the sugar beet genome appeared associated with high-copy number variation

Stamen-derived bioactive gibberellin is essential for male flower development of Cucurbita maxima L.

Gibberellin (GA) signalling during pumpkin male flower development is highly regulated, including biosynthetic, perception, and transduction pathways. GA 20-oxidases, 3-oxidases, and 2-oxidases catalyse the final part of GA synthesis. Additionally, 7-oxidase initiates this part of the pathway in some cucurbits including Cucurbita maxima L. (pumpkin). Expression patterns for these GA-oxidase-encoding genes were examined by competitive reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) and endogenous GA levels were determined during pumpkin male flower development. In young flowers, GA20ox3 transcript levels are high in stamens, followed by high levels of the GA precursor GA9. Later, just before flower opening, transcript levels for GA3ox3 and GA3ox4 increase in the hypanthium and stamens, respectively. In the stamen, following GA3ox4 expression, bioactive GA4 levels rise dramatically. Accordingly, catabolic GA2ox2 and GA2ox3 transcript levels are low in developing flowers, and increase in mature flowers. Putative GA receptor GID1b and DELLA repressor GAIPb transcript levels do not change in developing flowers, but increase sharply in mature flowers. Emasculation arrests floral development completely and leads to abscission of premature flowers. Application of GA4 (but not of its precursors GA12-aldehyde or GA9) restores normal growth of emasculated flowers. These results indicate that de novo GA4 synthesis in the stamen is under control of GA20ox3 and GA3ox4 genes just before the rapid flower growth phase. Stamen-derived bioactive GA is essential and sufficient for male flower development, including the petal and the pedicel growth

Pathogen and Circadian Controlled 1 (PCC1) Protein Is Anchored to the Plasma Membrane and Interacts with Subunit 5 of COP9 Signalosome in Arabidopsis

The Pathogen and Circadian Controlled 1 (PCC1) gene, previously identified and further characterized as involved in defense to pathogens and stress-induced flowering, codes for an 81-amino acid protein with a cysteine-rich C-terminal domain. This domain is essential for homodimerization and anchoring to the plasma membrane. Transgenic plants with the ß- glucuronidase (GUS) reporter gene under the control of 1.1 kb promoter sequence of PCC1 gene display a dual pattern of expression. At early post-germination, PCC1 is expressed only in the root vasculature and in the stomata guard cells of cotyledons. During the transition from vegetative to reproductive development, PCC1 is strongly expressed in the vascular tissue of petioles and basal part of the leaf, and it further spreads to the whole limb in fully expanded leaves. This developmental pattern of expression together with the late flowering phenotype of long-day grown RNA interference (iPCC1) plants with reduced PCC1 expression pointed to a regulatory role of PCC1 in the photoperiod-dependent flowering pathway. iPCC1 plants are defective in light perception and signaling but are not impaired in the function of the core CO-FT module of the photoperiod-dependent pathway. The regulatory effect exerted by PCC1 on the transition to flowering as well as on other reported phenotypes might be explained by a mechanism involving the interaction with the subunit 5 of the COP9 signalosome (CSN).This work was funded by grants BIO2008-00839, BIO2011-27526 and CSD2007-0057 from Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacion of Spain to J.L. A fellowship/contract of the FPU program of the Ministerio de Educacion y Ciencia (Spain) funded R.M. work. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.Mir Moreno, R.; Leon Ramos, J. (2014). Pathogen and Circadian Controlled 1 (PCC1) Protein Is Anchored to the Plasma Membrane and Interacts with Subunit 5 of COP9 Signalosome in Arabidopsis. PLoS ONE. 1(9):1-14. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0087216S11419Sauerbrunn, N., & Schlaich, N. L. (2004). PCC1 : a merging point for pathogen defence and circadian signalling in Arabidopsis. Planta, 218(4), 552-561. doi:10.1007/s00425-003-1143-zSEGARRA, S., MIR, R., MARTÍNEZ, C., & LEÓN, J. (2009). Genome-wide analyses of the transcriptomes of salicylic acid-deficient versus wild-type plants uncover Pathogen and Circadian Controlled 1 (PCC1) as a regulator of flowering time in Arabidopsis. Plant, Cell & Environment, 33(1), 11-22. doi:10.1111/j.1365-3040.2009.02045.xVenancio, T. M., & Aravind, L. (2009). CYSTM, a novel cysteine-rich transmembrane module with a role in stress tolerance across eukaryotes. Bioinformatics, 26(2), 149-152. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btp647Lau, O. S., & Deng, X. W. (2010). Plant hormone signaling lightens up: integrators of light and hormones. Current Opinion in Plant Biology, 13(5), 571-577. doi:10.1016/j.pbi.2010.07.001Seo, M., Nambara, E., Choi, G., & Yamaguchi, S. (2008). Interaction of light and hormone signals in germinating seeds. Plant Molecular Biology, 69(4), 463-472. doi:10.1007/s11103-008-9429-yDe Lucas, M., Davière, J.-M., Rodríguez-Falcón, M., Pontin, M., Iglesias-Pedraz, J. M., Lorrain, S., … Prat, S. (2008). A molecular framework for light and gibberellin control of cell elongation. Nature, 451(7177), 480-484. doi:10.1038/nature06520Feng, S., Martinez, C., Gusmaroli, G., Wang, Y., Zhou, J., Wang, F., … Deng, X. W. (2008). Coordinated regulation of Arabidopsis thaliana development by light and gibberellins. Nature, 451(7177), 475-479. doi:10.1038/nature06448Mutasa-Gottgens, E., & Hedden, P. (2009). Gibberellin as a factor in floral regulatory networks. Journal of Experimental Botany, 60(7), 1979-1989. doi:10.1093/jxb/erp040Bastian, R., Dawe, A., Meier, S., Ludidi, N., Bajic, V. B., & Gehring, C. (2010). Gibberellic acid and cGMP-dependent transcriptional regulation inArabidopsis thaliana. Plant Signaling & Behavior, 5(3), 224-232. doi:10.4161/psb.5.3.10718Yu, S., Galvão, V. C., Zhang, Y.-C., Horrer, D., Zhang, T.-Q., Hao, Y.-H., … Wang, J.-W. (2012). Gibberellin Regulates the Arabidopsis Floral Transition through miR156-Targeted SQUAMOSA PROMOTER BINDING–LIKE Transcription Factors. The Plant Cell, 24(8), 3320-3332. doi:10.1105/tpc.112.101014Arc, E., Galland, M., Cueff, G., Godin, B., Lounifi, I., Job, D., & Rajjou, L. (2011). Reboot the system thanks to protein post-translational modifications and proteome diversity: How quiescent seeds restart their metabolism to prepare seedling establishment. PROTEOMICS, 11(9), 1606-1618. doi:10.1002/pmic.201000641Dill, A., Thomas, S. G., Hu, J., Steber, C. M., & Sun, T. (2004). The Arabidopsis F-Box Protein SLEEPY1 Targets Gibberellin Signaling Repressors for Gibberellin-Induced Degradation. The Plant Cell, 16(6), 1392-1405. doi:10.1105/tpc.020958Wang, F., & Deng, X. W. (2011). Plant ubiquitin-proteasome pathway and its role in gibberellin signaling. Cell Research, 21(9), 1286-1294. doi:10.1038/cr.2011.118Hotton, S. K., & Callis, J. (2008). Regulation of Cullin RING Ligases. Annual Review of Plant Biology, 59(1), 467-489. doi:10.1146/annurev.arplant.58.032806.104011Cope, G. A. (2002). Role of Predicted Metalloprotease Motif of Jab1/Csn5 in Cleavage of Nedd8 from Cul1. Science, 298(5593), 608-611. doi:10.1126/science.1075901Gusmaroli, G., Figueroa, P., Serino, G., & Deng, X. W. (2007). Role of the MPN Subunits in COP9 Signalosome Assembly and Activity, and Their Regulatory Interaction with Arabidopsis Cullin3-Based E3 Ligases. The Plant Cell, 19(2), 564-581. doi:10.1105/tpc.106.047571Serino, G., & Deng, X.-W. (2003). THECOP9 SIGNALOSOME: Regulating Plant Development Through the Control of Proteolysis. Annual Review of Plant Biology, 54(1), 165-182. doi:10.1146/annurev.arplant.54.031902.134847Stratmann, J. W., & Gusmaroli, G. (2012). Many jobs for one good cop – The COP9 signalosome guards development and defense. Plant Science, 185-186, 50-64. doi:10.1016/j.plantsci.2011.10.004Lozano-Juste, J., & León, J. (2011). Nitric Oxide Regulates DELLA Content and PIF Expression to Promote Photomorphogenesis in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiology, 156(3), 1410-1423. doi:10.1104/pp.111.177741Nakagawa, T., Kurose, T., Hino, T., Tanaka, K., Kawamukai, M., Niwa, Y., … Kimura, T. (2007). Development of series of gateway binary vectors, pGWBs, for realizing efficient construction of fusion genes for plant transformation. Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering, 104(1), 34-41. doi:10.1263/jbb.104.34Fromont-Racine, M., Rain, J.-C., & Legrain, P. (1997). Toward a functional analysis of the yeast genome through exhaustive two-hybrid screens. Nature Genetics, 16(3), 277-282. doi:10.1038/ng0797-277Belda-Palazón B, Ruiz L, Martí E, Tárraga S, Tiburcio AF, et al.. (2012) Aminopropyltransferases involved in polyamine biosynthesis localize preferentially in the nucleus of plant cells. PLoS One 7(10), e46907.Simon, R., Igeño, M. I., & Coupland, G. (1996). Activation of floral meristem identity genes in Arabidopsis. Nature, 384(6604), 59-62. doi:10.1038/384059a0Martínez, C., Pons, E., Prats, G., & León, J. (2003). Salicylic acid regulates flowering time and links defence responses and reproductive development. The Plant Journal, 37(2), 209-217. doi:10.1046/j.1365-313x.2003.01954.xKyte, J., & Doolittle, R. F. (1982). A simple method for displaying the hydropathic character of a protein. Journal of Molecular Biology, 157(1), 105-132. doi:10.1016/0022-2836(82)90515-0Marmagne, A., Rouet, M.-A., Ferro, M., Rolland, N., Alcon, C., Joyard, J., … Ephritikhine, G. (2004). Identification of New Intrinsic Proteins inArabidopsisPlasma Membrane Proteome. Molecular & Cellular Proteomics, 3(7), 675-691. doi:10.1074/mcp.m400001-mcp200Nühse, T. S., Stensballe, A., Jensen, O. N., & Peck, S. C. (2004). Phosphoproteomics of the Arabidopsis Plasma Membrane and a New Phosphorylation Site Database. The Plant Cell, 16(9), 2394-2405. doi:10.1105/tpc.104.023150Kobayashi, Y., & Weigel, D. (2007). Move on up, it’s time for change mobile signals controlling photoperiod-dependent flowering. Genes & Development, 21(19), 2371-2384. doi:10.1101/gad.1589007Jaeger, K. E., & Wigge, P. A. (2007). FT Protein Acts as a Long-Range Signal in Arabidopsis. Current Biology, 17(12), 1050-1054. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2007.05.008Mathieu, J., Warthmann, N., Küttner, F., & Schmid, M. (2007). Export of FT Protein from Phloem Companion Cells Is Sufficient for Floral Induction in Arabidopsis. Current Biology, 17(12), 1055-1060. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2007.05.009Mir, R., Hernández, M. L., Abou-Mansour, E., Martínez-Rivas, J. M., Mauch, F., Métraux, J.-P., & León, J. (2013). Pathogen and Circadian Controlled 1 (PCC1) regulates polar lipid content, ABA-related responses, and pathogen defence in Arabidopsis thaliana. Journal of Experimental Botany, 64(11), 3385-3395. doi:10.1093/jxb/ert177Nordgård, O., Dahle, Ø., Andersen, T. Ø., & Gabrielsen, O. S. (2001). JAB1/CSN5 interacts with the GAL4 DNA binding domain: A note of caution about two-hybrid interactions. Biochimie, 83(10), 969-971. doi:10.1016/s0300-9084(01)01329-3Kwok, S. F., Staub, J. M., & Deng, X.-W. (1999). Characterization of two subunits of Arabidopsis 19S proteasome regulatory complex and its possible interaction with the COP9 complex 1 1Edited by J. Karn. Journal of Molecular Biology, 285(1), 85-95. doi:10.1006/jmbi.1998.2315Nezames, C. D., & Deng, X. W. (2012). The COP9 Signalosome: Its Regulation of Cullin-Based E3 Ubiquitin Ligases and Role in Photomorphogenesis. Plant Physiology, 160(1), 38-46. doi:10.1104/pp.112.198879Moon, J., Parry, G., & Estelle, M. (2004). The Ubiquitin-Proteasome Pathway and Plant Development. The Plant Cell, 16(12), 3181-3195. doi:10.1105/tpc.104.161220Dreher, K., & Callis, J. (2007). Ubiquitin, Hormones and Biotic Stress in Plants. Annals of Botany, 99(5), 787-822. doi:10.1093/aob/mcl255Parry, G., & Estelle, M. (2004). Regulation of cullin-based ubiquitin ligases by the Nedd8/RUB ubiquitin-like proteins. Seminars in Cell & Developmental Biology, 15(2), 221-229. doi:10.1016/j.semcdb.2003.12.003Wee, S., Geyer, R. K., Toda, T., & Wolf, D. A. (2005). CSN facilitates Cullin–RING ubiquitin ligase function by counteracting autocatalytic adapter instability. Nature Cell Biology, 7(4), 387-391. doi:10.1038/ncb1241Kuramata, M., Masuya, S., Takahashi, Y., Kitagawa, E., Inoue, C., Ishikawa, S., … Kusano, T. (2008). Novel Cysteine-Rich Peptides from Digitaria ciliaris and Oryza sativa Enhance Tolerance to Cadmium by Limiting its Cellular Accumulation. Plant and Cell Physiology, 50(1), 106-117. doi:10.1093/pcp/pcn175Zeng, W., Melotto, M., & He, S. Y. (2010). Plant stomata: a checkpoint of host immunity and pathogen virulence. Current Opinion in Biotechnology, 21(5), 599-603. doi:10.1016/j.copbio.2010.05.006Wigge, P. A. (2011). FT, A Mobile Developmental Signal in Plants. Current Biology, 21(9), R374-R378. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2011.03.038Kardailsky, I. (1999). Activation Tagging of the Floral Inducer FT. Science, 286(5446), 1962-1965. doi:10.1126/science.286.5446.1962Srikanth, A., & Schmid, M. (2011). Regulation of flowering time: all roads lead to Rome. Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, 68(12), 2013-2037. doi:10.1007/s00018-011-0673-yGalvao, V. C., Horrer, D., Kuttner, F., & Schmid, M. (2012). Spatial control of flowering by DELLA proteins in Arabidopsis thaliana. Development, 139(21), 4072-4082. doi:10.1242/dev.080879Cerdán, P. D., & Chory, J. (2003). Regulation of flowering time by light quality. Nature, 423(6942), 881-885. doi:10.1038/nature01636Guo, H. (1998). Regulation of Flowering Time by Arabidopsis Photoreceptors. Science, 279(5355), 1360-1363. doi:10.1126/science.279.5355.1360Liu, B., Zuo, Z., Liu, H., Liu, X., & Lin, C. (2011). Arabidopsis cryptochrome 1 interacts with SPA1 to suppress COP1 activity in response to blue light. Genes & Development, 25(10), 1029-1034. doi:10.1101/gad.2025011Weidler, G., zur Oven-Krockhaus, S., Heunemann, M., Orth, C., Schleifenbaum, F., Harter, K., … Batschauer, A. (2012). Degradation of Arabidopsis CRY2 Is Regulated by SPA Proteins and Phytochrome A. The Plant Cell, 24(6), 2610-2623. doi:10.1105/tpc.112.09821