Statistical comparisons of heavy-metal concentrations in river sediments

Statistical t tests were used to determine lead, copper, and chromium enrichment in sediments from the Lower Branch of the Rouge River in southeast Michigan, USA. Both absolute metal concentrations and ratios of trace metal to conservative metal concentrations were used to compare sampled sites along the Lower Branch of the Rouge River to background sites in the headwaters region. Concentration ratios were used to reduce the effects of certain chemical and physical characteristics on the level of metal contained in a given sediment. Results from the comparison of sample sites to the background reveal metal enrichment at several sites, particularly along the highly urbanized, downstream section of the river. This section of the Lower Branch of the Rouge River exhibits significant lead and copper contamination, as well as measurable chromium enrichment when using either concentrations alone or ratios as methods of comparison. The areas of metal enrichment appear to coincide closely with areas of known anthropogenic activities. Of particular interest, however, is the enrichment of lead and copper at two upstream sites where the statistical tests suggest an anthropogenic source for the enrichment, but where no previously known cultural activities existed. These data prompted a historical search of records, which discovered several abandoned landfills immediately upstream of the metal enrichment sites.Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/46769/1/254_2004_Article_BF00770602.pd

Prevalence and socio-demographic predictors of food insecurity in Australia during the COVID-19 pandemic

The COVID-19 pandemic has exacerbated economic vulnerabilities and disrupted theAustralian food supply, with potential implications for food insecurity. This study aims to describe theprevalence and socio-demographic associations of food insecurity in Tasmania, Australia, during theCOVID-19 pandemic. A cross-sectional survey (deployed late May to early June 2020) incorporatedthe U.S. Household Food Security Survey Module: Six-Item Short Form, and fifteen demographicand COVID-related income questions. Survey data (n = 1170) were analyzed using univariate andmultivariate binary logistic regression. The prevalence of food insecurity was 26%. The adjusted oddsof food insecurity were higher among respondents with a disability, from a rural area, and living withdependents. Increasing age, a university education, and income above $80,000/year were protectiveagainst food insecurity. Food insecurity more than doubled with a loss of household income above25% (Adjusted Odds Ratio (AOR): 2.02; 95% CI: 1.11, 3.71; p = 0.022), and the odds further increasedwith loss of income above 75% (AOR: 7.14; 95% CI: 2.01, 24.83; p = 0.002). Our results suggest thatthe prevalence of food insecurity may have increased during the COVID-19 pandemic, particularlyamong economically vulnerable households and people who lost income. Policies that supportdisadvantaged households and ensure adequate employment opportunities are important to supportAustralians throughout and post the COVID-19 pandemic

Definitions, sources and self-reported consumption of regionally grown fruits and vegetables in two regions of Australia

Regional food systems are complex networks, with numerous retail sources that underpin a local economy. However, evidence is limited regarding how consumers define, identify, and source regionally grown fresh fruits and vegetables (RGFFV). A cross-sectional study was conducted in Tasmania (TAS) and South Western Australia (SWA) to compare how RGFFV are defined, identified and sourced by consumers, including self-reported consumption of selected RGFFV. Survey data were analyzed using the Chi-square test and t-tests. Results (TAS n = 120, SWA n= 123) identified that consumers had mixed perceptions of how RGFFV are defined, including produce sold at farmers markets, or grown within their region (TAS/SWA). RGFFV were commonly identified using product labelling (55% TAS, 69% SWA; p > 0.05). Respondents reported frequently shopping for RGFFV at major supermarkets, with more TAS respondents shopping weekly in comparison to SWA respondents (67% vs. 38%; p p = 0.012). The major RGFFV consumed were root vegetables and apples/pears, but consumers were frequently unsure about the produce's provenance. Our findings indicate multiple opportunities to improve consumption of fresh, regional produce in TAS and SWA, which may positively impact regional economic growth and community health

Australian consumer perceptions of regionally grown fruits and vegetables: importance, enablers, and barriers

Fresh fruits and vegetables are a cornerstone of a balanced diet; their consumption has health, environmental, ethical, and economic implications. This pilot study aimed to: (i) measure fruit and vegetable consumption; (ii) understand consumer perceptions of the perceived importance of regionally grown fresh fruit and vegetables (RGFFV); and (iii) identify the barriers and enablers of access and consumption of RGFFV. The study took place in Tasmania (TAS) and South Western Australia (SWA). A 54-item survey included questions relating to purchasing and consumption patterns; barriers and enablers related to access and consumption of RGFFV; and sociodemographic information. Survey data were analyzed using Chi-square test and binary logistic regression. A total of n = 120 TAS and n = 123 SWA adult respondents participated. SWA respondents had higher intakes of fruit (p p < 0.001). Almost all respondents (97%) rated purchasing of RGFFV as important. Top enablers included produce freshness (97%), and to financially support local farmers (94%) and the local community (91%). Barriers included limited seasonal availability of the produce (26%), the belief that RGFFV were expensive (12%) and food budgetary constraints (10%). Recommendations include broader marketing and labelling of seasonal RGFFV; increasing 'buy local' campaigns; consumer information about how RGFFV benefits producers and communities; and pricing produce according to quality

An Empirical Model for Estimating Remediation Costs at Contaminated Sites

A model for estimating the remediation costs at contaminated sites is developed, in which the predictor variable is a composite of surface, subsurface, and contaminant risk factors. Calibration of the model is performed at 83 sites in an urbanized watershed with diverse surface geology in southeastern Michigan. These test sites exhibited different extents of contamination, including some where only soil was contaminated, and others where soil and groundwater were contaminated. The model was then applied to 79 sites with multiple contamination extents within different watersheds in North America, Europe, Australia, and Africa. The results indicate a very high correlation between the estimated and actual remediation costs at these sites. This model thus has the potential for providing reliable estimates of remediation costs across a broad array of soil and groundwater contamination scenarios, including dense nonaqueous phase liquid (DNAPL) contamination in sandy soil and lead in clay soil.Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/43898/1/11270_2005_Article_214.pd

Lunar elemental composition and ivestigations with D-CIXS x-ray mapping spectrometer on SMART-1

The D-CIXS Compact X-ray Spectrometer on ESA SMART-1 successfully launched in Sept 2003 can derive 45 km resolution images of the Moon with a spectral resolution of 185 eV, providing the first high-resolution global map of rock forming element abundances

The knowledge, barriers and opportunities to improve nutrition and physical activity amongst young people attending an Australian youth mental health service: a mixed-methods study

BackgroundMental illnesses are the leading cause of disability in young people, and lifestyle interventions in young people at risk of mental illness remain a priority. Opportunities to improve nutrition and physical activity among young people through youth mental health services remain unclear. This study aimed to determine the knowledge and behaviors towards nutrition and physical activity, the barriers and enablers to improving behaviors, and the preferred providers and sources of information for nutrition and physical activity among a sample of young people attending a youth mental health service.MethodsA mixed-method study was conducted in regional Tasmania, Australia in a sample of young people (15–25 years) attending a youth mental health service (headspace). A quantitative survey (n = 48) determined young people’s nutrition and physical activity knowledge, behaviors, barriers and enablers to achieving recommendations, and their preferred providers and sources of information. Structured interviews and a focus group further explored these concepts (n = 8), including the role of the mental health service as a provider of this support.ResultsThe majority of participants did not meet national recommendations for nutrition and physical activity, despite possessing a high level of knowledge regarding their importance for mental health. Improving mental health was a common enabling factor for participants choosing to alter diet and physical activity habits, but also the leading barrier for participating in physical activity. Young people wanted to receive information from reputable health providers, ideally through social media sources. headspace was seen as an important potential provider of this information.ConclusionsOur results indicate that there is a clear need to improve diet and physical activity habits to enhance mental and physical health outcomes in this at-risk group, and youth mental health services could provide further interventions to support their clients. Specialized staff (e.g. dietitians and exercise physiologists) may provide additional benefits alongside existing mental health care support

Total versus partial knee replacement in patients with medial compartment knee osteoarthritis : the TOPKAT RCT

Article history The research reported in this issue of the journal was funded by the HTA programme as project number 08/14/08. The contractual start date was in January 2010. The draft report began editorial review in February 2019 and was accepted for publication in October 2019. The authors have been wholly responsible for all data collection, analysis and interpretation, and for writing up their work. The HTA editors and publisher have tried to ensure the accuracy of the authors’ report and would like to thank the reviewers for their constructive comments on the draft document. However, they do not accept liability for damages or losses arising from material published in this report. Acknowledgements TOPKAT study group Chief investigator David Beard. Trial co-investigators Nigel Arden (Oxford), Helen Campbell (Oxford), Marion Campbell (Aberdeen), Andrew Carr (Oxford), Jonathan Cook (Aberdeen then Oxford), Helen Doll (Oxford), Ray Fitzpatrick (Oxford), David Murray (Oxford) and Andrew Price (Oxford). Trial management Mayret Castillo (until 2011), Cushla Cooper, Loretta Davies, Anne Duncan (until 2017), Gordon Fernie, Sophie Halpin (until 2015) and Alison McDonald. Trial administration Katie Chegwin, Jiyang Li (until 2018), Elena Rabaiotti (until 2013), Sandra Regan (until 2012) and Victoria Stalker (until 2014). Data management Diana Collins (until 2013), Janice Cruden, Akiko Greshon, Kay Holland and Beverley Smith (until 2017). Database/programming management Gladys McPherson. Trial statisticians Charles Boachie (until 2013), Jemma Hudson and Graeme MacLennan. Health economists Helen Campbell (until 2015), Francesco Fusco (until 2018), Seamus Kent and Jose Leal. We would also like to thank Hannah Wilson (DPhil student, University of Oxford) for her help with the update to the literature search. Research teams We are grateful to the participants and research teams at collaborating hospital sites: Aneurin Bevan University Health Board, Royal Gwent Hospital Ruth Jenkins, Mark Lewis [principal investigator (PI)] and Witek Mintowt-Czyz. Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Musgrove Park Hospital, Belfast David Beverland (PI), Leeann Bryce, Julie Catney, Ian Dobie, Emer Doran and Seamus O’Brien. Chesterfield Royal Hospital NHS Foundation Trust Fazal Ali, Heather Cripps, Amanda Whileman, Phil Williams (PI) and Julie Toms. County Durham and Darlington NHS Foundation Trust Ellen Brown, Gillian Horner, Andrew Jennings (PI) and Glynis Rose. East Lancashire Hospitals NHS Trust, Royal Blackburn Hospital Frances Bamford, Wendy Goddard, Hans Marynissen (PI), Haleh Peel and Lyndsey Richards. Great Western Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Swindon Amanda Bell, Sunny Deo, Sarah Grayland, David Hollinghurst, Suzannah Pegler, Venkat Satish (PI) and Claire Woodruffe. Harrogate and District NHS Foundation Trust, Harrogate Nick London (PI), David Duffy, Caroline Bennett and James Featherstone. Hull and East Yorkshire Hospitals NHS Trust Joss Cook, Kim Dearnley, Nagarajan Muthukumar (PI), Laura Onuoha and Sarah Wilson. Maidstone and Tunbridge Wells NHS Trust, Medway Sandhu Banher, Eunice Emeakaroha, Jamie Horohan, Sunil Jain (PI) and Susan Thompson. Mid Yorkshire Hospitals NHS Trust Sarah Buckley, Aaron Ng (PI), Ajit Shetty and Karen Simeson. Milton Keynes University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust Julian Flynn, Meryl Newsom, Cheryl Padilla-Harris and Oliver Pearce (PI). NHS Grampian, Woodend Hospital, Aberdeen James Bidwell (PI), Alison Innes, Winifred Culley and Bill Ledingham and Janis Stephen. North Bristol NHS Trust Rachel Bray, Hywel Davies, Debbie Delgado, Jonathan Eldridge, Leigh Morrison, James Murray (PI), Andrew Porteous and James Robinson. North Cumbria University Hospitals NHS Trust, Carlisle Matt Dawson (PI), Raj Dharmarajan, David Elson, Will Hage, Nicci Kelsall and Mike Orr. North Tees and Hartlepool NHS Foundation Trust, Stockton-On-Tees Jackie Grosvenor, SS Maheswaran (PI), Claire McCue, Hemanth Venkatesh, Michelle Wild and Deborah Wilson. Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre Chris Dodd, William Jackson (PI), Pam Lovegrove, David Murray, Jennifer Piper and Andrew Price. Royal United Hospitals Bath NHS Foundation Trust, Bath Neil Bradbury, Lucy Clark, Stefanie Duncan, Genevieve Simpson and Allister Trezies (PI). Sherwood Forest Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Kings Mill Hospital, Sutton in Ashfield Vikram Desai (PI), Cheryl Heeley, Kramer Guy and Rosalyn Jackson. South Devon Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Torbay Alan Hall, Gordon Higgins (PI), Michael Hockings, David Isaac and Pauline Mercer. Stockport NHS Foundation Trust, Stockport Lindsey Barber, Helen Cochrane, Janette Curtis, Julie Grindey, David Johnson (PI), and Phil Turner. The Hillingdon Hospitals NHS Trust David Houlihan-Burne (PI), Briony Hill, Ron Langstaff and Mariam Nasseri. The Ipswich Hospital NHS Trust, Ipswich Mark Bowditch, Chris Martin, Steven Pryke, Bally Purewal, Chris Servant (PI), Sheeba Suresh and Claire Tricker. University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester Robert Ashford, Manjit Attwal, Jeanette Bunga, Urjit Chatterji, Susan Cockburn, Colin Esler (PI), Steven Godsiff, Tim Green, Christina Haines and Subash Tandon. University Hospitals of North Midlands NHS Trust, Stoke on Trent Racquel Carpio, Sarah Griffiths, Natalie Grocott and Ian dos Remedios (PI). University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust David Barrett, Phil Chapman-Sheath, Caroline Grabau, Jane Moghul, William Tice (PI) and Catherine Trevithick. United Lincolnshire Hospitals NHS Trust, Boston Rajiv Deshmukh, Mandy Howes, Kimberley Netherton, Dipak Raj (PI) and Nikki Travis. United Lincolnshire Hospitals NHS Trust, Lincoln Mohammad Maqsood, Rebecca Norton, Farzana Rashid, Alison Raynor, Mark Rowsell and Karen Warner. We would like to thank the external members of the TSC and DMC for their advice and support for the project. Trial Steering Committee Donna Dodwell as our patient representative, Simon Donell (chairperson) (University of East Anglia), Shawn Tavares (Royal Berkshire Hospital) and Jonathan Waite (South Warwickshire NHS Foundation Trust). Data Monitoring Committee Karen Barker (Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust), Gordon Murray (chairperson) (University of Edinburgh) and Hamish Simpson (University of Edinburgh). Independent review and interpretation of results Professor David Torgerson (University of York). Professor Chris Maher (University of Sydney). Mr Peter Brownson (The Royal Liverpool and Broadgreen University Hospitals NHS Trust). Professor Simon Donell (University of East Anglia, Norwich). Mr Mark Mullins (Abertawe Bro Morgannwg University Health Board). Professor Jane Blazeby (Bristol University).Peer reviewedPublisher PD