Light and myopia: from epidemiological studies to neurobiological mechanisms

Myopia is far beyond its inconvenience and represents a true, highly prevalent, sight-threatening ocular condition, especially in Asia. Without adequate interventions, the current epidemic of myopia is projected to affect 50% of the world population by 2050, becoming the leading cause of irreversible blindness. Although blurred vision, the predominant symptom of myopia, can be improved by contact lenses, glasses, or refractive surgery, corrected myopia, particularly high myopia, still carries the risk of secondary blinding complications such as glaucoma, myopic maculopathy, and retinal detachment, prompting the need for prevention. Epidemiological studies have reported an association between outdoor time and myopia prevention in children. The protective effect of time spent outdoors could be due to the unique characteristics (intensity, spectral distribution, temporal pattern, etc.) of sunlight that is lacking in artificial lighting. Concomitantly, studies in animal models have highlighted the efficacy of light and its components in delaying or even stopping the development of myopia and endeavoured to elucidate possible mechanisms involved in this process. In this narrative review, we (1) summarize the current knowledge concerning light modulation of ocular growth and refractive error development based on studies in human and animal models, (2) summarize potential neurobiological mechanisms involved in the effects of light on ocular growth and emmetropization and (3) highlight a potential pathway for the translational development of noninvasive light-therapy strategies for myopia prevention in children.info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersio

A Duration-Dependent Interaction Between High-Intensity Light and Unrestricted Vision in the Drive for Myopia Control

Purpose: To evaluate the duration-dependent and synergetic impact of high-intensity light (HL) and unrestricted vision (UnV) on lens-induced myopia (LIM) development in chickens. Methods: Myopia was induced in one eye in chicks (10 groups, n = 126) from day 1 posthatching (D1) until day 8 (D8) using –10 diopter (D) lenses. Fellow eyes remained uncovered as controls. Nine groups were exposed daily to 2, 4, or 6 hours of HL (15,000 lux), UnV (removal of –10 D lens), or both (HL + UnV). One group served as the LIM group without any interventions. Ocular axial length (AL), refractive error, and choroidal thickness were measured on D1, D4, and D8. Outcome measures are expressed as interocular difference (IOD = experimental eye – control eye) ± SEM. Results: By D8, LIM increased AL (0.36 ± 0.04 mm), myopic refraction (−9.02 ± 0.37 D), and choroidal thinning (−90.27 ± 16.44 µm) in the LIM group (all, P < 0.001). Compared to the LIM group, exposure to 2, 4, or 6 hours of HL, UnV, or HL + UnV reduced myopic refraction in a duration-dependent manner, with UnV being more effective than HL (P < 0.05). Only 6 hours of HL + UnV (not 2 or 4 hours) prevented LIM and was more effective than UnV (P = 0.004) or HL (P < 0.001) in reducing myopic refraction and more effective than HL (P < 0.001) in reducing axial elongation. Conclusions: Daily exposure to 2, 4, or 6 hours of HL, UnV, or HL + UnV reduced lens-induced myopic refraction in a duration-dependent manner in chickens. Only 6 hours of HL + UnV completely stopped LIM development. The synergetic effect of HL and UnV is dependent on the duration of the interventions

Recovery From Form-Deprivation Myopia in Chicks Is Dependent Upon the Fullness and Correlated Color Temperature of the Light Spectrum.

10.1167/iovs.63.2.16Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci63216

Light and myopia: from epidemiological studies to neurobiological mechanisms

Myopia is far beyond its inconvenience and represents a true, highly prevalent, sight-threatening ocular condition, especially in Asia. Without adequate interventions, the current epidemic of myopia is projected to affect 50% of the world population by 2050, becoming the leading cause of irreversible blindness. Although blurred vision, the predominant symptom of myopia, can be improved by contact lenses, glasses or refractive surgery, corrected myopia, particularly high myopia, still carries the risk of secondary blinding complications such as glaucoma, myopic maculopathy and retinal detachment, prompting the need for prevention. Epidemiological studies have reported an association between outdoor time and myopia prevention in children. The protective effect of time spent outdoors could be due to the unique characteristics (intensity, spectral distribution, temporal pattern, etc.) of sunlight that are lacking in artificial lighting. Concomitantly, studies in animal models have highlighted the efficacy of light and its components in delaying or even stopping the development of myopia and endeavoured to elucidate possible mechanisms involved in this process. In this narrative review, we (1) summarize the current knowledge concerning light modulation of ocular growth and refractive error development based on studies in human and animal models, (2) summarize potential neurobiological mechanisms involved in the effects of light on ocular growth and emmetropization and (3) highlight a potential pathway for the translational development of noninvasive light-therapy strategies for myopia prevention in children

Ocular growth and metabolomics are dependent upon the spectral content of ambient white light

10.1038/s41598-021-87201-2Scientific Reports11

A duration-dependent interaction between high-intensity light and optical refocus in the drive for myopia control

PURPOSE To evaluate the duration-dependent and synergetic impact of high-intensity light (HL) and optical refocus (RF) on lens-induced myopia (LIM) development in chickens. METHODS Myopia was induced in one eye in chicks (10 groups, n=126) from day 1 post- hatching (D1) until D8 using -10D lenses. Fellow eyes remained uncovered as controls. Nine groups were exposed daily to continuous 2 hours (h), 4h, or 6h of either HL (15,000 lux); RF (removal of -10D lens); or both (HL+RF). One group served as the LIM group without any interventions. Ocular axial length (AL), refractive error, and choroidal thickness were measured on D1, D4, and D8. Outcome measures are expressed as inter-ocular difference (IOD= experimental - control eye) ±SEM. RESULTS By D8, LIM increased AL (0.36±0.04 mm), myopic refraction (-9.02±0.37D), and choroidal thinning (-90.27±16.44 µm) in the LIM group (all, P CONCLUSION Daily exposure to 2h, 4h, or 6h of HL, RF, or HL+RF reduced lens-induced myopic refraction in a duration-dependent manner in chickens. Only 6h of HL+RF completely stopped LIM development. The synergetic effect of HL and RF is dependent on the duration of the interventions