Facing Stress: Coping Strategies, Resilience and Mental Health Outcomes in Autistic Adults

There is consensus surrounding the poor mental health outcomes experienced by many in the Autistic adult population. While the non-autistic literature suggests that high stress represents a key contributor to poor mental health and well-being, individual resources such as coping and resilience have the potential to mitigate the negative effects of stress, accounting for individual differences across mental health outcomes. Despite emerging research showing high stress in Autistic adults, investigations of coping and resilience in this population remain limited. In this seminar, Melanie will discuss the research conducted as part of her PhD, where she examined coping strategies and resilience, and their associations with stress, mental health and well-being in Autistic adults. A broader synthesis of the research findings will be presented, followed by a discussion on potential future empirical and clinical directions in the field.</p

Inter-relationships between trait resilience, coping strategies, and mental health outcomes in autistic adults

Resilience has been depicted as a key characteristic in the promotion of mental health in the face of stress and adversity. Despite high levels of stress encountered in the autistic population, resilience studies remain scarce. Using data from an Australian longitudinal adult study, this study explored the inter-relationships between trait resilience, coping, and mental health in a sample of autistic adults (N = 78). In particular, we examined the relationship between resilience and use of coping strategies, and the potential mediating role of coping strategies in the relationship between resilience and mental health outcomes. Our findings suggested that increased use of engagement coping (e.g., problem-solving, positive appraisal) and decreased use of disengagement coping (e.g., self-blame, being in denial) strategies were associated with higher levels of resilience. Further, mediation analysis results suggest that disengagement coping mediated the associations between resilience and all three mental health outcomes (i.e., depression, anxiety, and well-being), while engagement coping strategies mediated the relationship between resilience and well-being only. Our results illustrate that coping strategies may be an important mechanism in explaining the resilience-mental health relationship in autistic adults, highlighting the importance of considering stress-related constructs together (i.e., trait resilience and coping) when addressing support and intervention options for mental health difficulties in the autistic adult population. Lay Summary: This research explored how resilience and coping strategies influence the mental health and well-being of autistic adults. We found that resilient autistic adults used more engagement coping strategies, less disengagement coping strategies, and reported better mental health and well-being. Considering stress-related factors together (i.e., resilience and coping) offers a novel perspective to mental health difficulties in autistic adults and may be a vital step in the development of support options in this population

Factor structure and psychometric properties of the Brief COPE in autistic older adolescents and adults

Background: Autistic adults experience high levels of stress, which may negatively affect their mental health. However, research into coping with stress in this population is limited, with no coping measures specifically validated for use in the autistic population. Method: Utilising data from two Australian longitudinal adult studies, exploratory factor analysis was conducted to determine the factor structure that best represented the use of coping strategies in a sample of autistic adults (N = 255) using the Brief COPE. Mental health and well-being measures were used to provide information on psychometric properties. To explore potential intricacies in factor structure that may be unique to autistic adults, a preliminary subjective comparison with a non-autistic adult sample (N = 165) was also conducted. Results: A six-factor solution, with high internal reliabilities, best represented the use of coping strategies in the autistic adult sample. Good convergent and divergent validities for the conceptually relevant coping factors were also reported. Subjective comparisons raise the possibility of some similarities (e.g., support-seeking coping strategies) and differences (e.g., the use of self-distraction coping strategies) in factor structures between the autistic and non-autistic samples. Conclusions: This study provides an initial validation of the Brief COPE in autistic adults and supports its usefulness in assessing coping strategies in response to stress in this population. Findings also have potential implications for informing intervention services for autistic individuals, given the known relationships between the coping of stress and broader outcomes, such as mental health

[In Press] Brief report : longitudinal role of coping strategies on mental health outcomes in autistic youth and adults

The stress literature suggests that coping strategies are implicated in mental health outcomes. However, the longitudinal relationship between coping strategies and mental health in the autistic adult population has not yet been examined. This 2-year longitudinal study examined the predictive role of both baseline and change in coping strategy use over time (i.e., an increase or decrease) on anxiety, depression, and well-being after 2-years in 87 autistic adults aged 16 to 80 years. Controlling for baseline mental health, both baseline and increase in disengagement coping strategies (e.g., denial, self-blame) predicted higher anxiety and depression, and lower well-being, while an increase in engagement coping strategies (e.g., problem solving, acceptance) predicted higher well-being. These findings extend the current coping literature in autistic adults, offering insight into mental health support and intervention options

Associations between coping strategies and mental health outcomes in autistic adults

Compared to the general population, mental health difficulties are commonly reported in autistic adults. However, the ways in which coping strategies are associated with mental health and well-being in this population remain unknown. Further, we do not know if, and if so, how these associations might differ to that of non-autistic adults. In this study, we hypothesized that in both our autistic (N = 255) and non-autistic (N = 165) adult samples, disengagement coping strategies (e.g., denial) would relate to poorer mental health and well-being, while engagement coping strategies (e.g., problem solving) would relate to better mental health and well-being. Regression analyses revealed that higher use of disengagement coping strategies was significantly associated with higher levels of anxiety and depression, and lower levels of well-being in both samples. In contrast, increased use of engagement coping strategies was associated with better well-being, but only in the autistic sample. Our results contribute to the characterization of negative and positive mental health outcomes in autistic adults from a coping perspective, with potential to offer novel information regarding coping strategies to consider when addressing support options for mental health difficulties in the autistic adult population. Lay Summary: Mental health conditions (such as anxiety and depression) and poor well-being are commonly reported in autistic adults. Research suggests that how one copes with stress is associated with one's mental health and well-being. However, we have little information about how coping strategies relate to the mental health of autistic adults, and whether this might be different in non-autistic adults. In this study, we examined the relationship between coping strategies and mental health in a large group of autistic individuals aged 15–80 years. We then compared this with similar aged non-autistic individuals. We found that in both the autistic and non-autistic individuals, using more disengagement coping strategies (such as being in denial, blaming oneself) was related to poorer mental health and well-being. Additionally, using more engagement coping strategies (such as problem solving, acceptance) was related to better mental health and well-being, but only in the autistic individuals. These results can help inform support services, as they highlight the coping strategies that may need to be focused on (i.e., developing engagement coping strategies and reducing disengagement coping strategies) in order to better support the mental health of autistic individuals

Autism-related dietary preferences mediate autism-gut microbiome associations

There is increasing interest in the potential contribution of the gut microbiome to autism spectrum disorder (ASD). However, previous studies have been underpowered and have not been designed to address potential confounding factors in a comprehensive way. We performed a large autism stool metagenomics study (n = 247) based on participants from the Australian Autism Biobank and the Queensland Twin Adolescent Brain project. We found negligible direct associations between ASD diagnosis and the gut microbiome. Instead, our data support a model whereby ASD-related restricted interests are associated with less-diverse diet, and in turn reduced microbial taxonomic diversity and looser stool consistency. In contrast to ASD diagnosis, our dataset was well powered to detect microbiome associations with traits such as age, dietary intake, and stool consistency. Overall, microbiome differences in ASD may reflect dietary preferences that relate to diagnostic features, and we caution against claims that the microbiome has a driving role in ASD.</p

Erratum: Autism-related dietary preferences mediate autism-gut microbiome associations (Cell (2021) 184(24) (5916–5931.e17), (S0092867421012319), (10.1016/j.cell.2021.10.015))

(Cell 184, 5916–5931; November 24, 2021) Our paper reported evidence that autism-related dietary preferences mediate autism-microbiome associations. Since publication, we have become aware of an error in our paper that we are now correcting. Specifically, in the code we wrote and used to transform the microbiome count matrices in our variance component analysis, we inadvertently missed a matrix transposition, which affected their centered-log-ratio (clr) transformation and affected variance estimates in Figure 2 and Table S1 (listed in detail below). By missing the matrix transposition, we incorrectly calculated the geometric mean per-taxa rather than per-individual. However, the error does not affect the conclusions of the paper because the per-taxa and per-individual geometric means are similar, and so the resulting clr transformed matrices are similar as well (note that the clr transform should take the quotient of a microbiome/taxa quantity by the geometric mean of microbiome quantities across the sample/individual). To show that this is the case, we compared the correctly (geometric mean calculated per-individual) and incorrectly (geometric mean calculated per-taxa) clr transformed matrices by taking the nth column of both matrices (representing each of 247 individuals’ microbiome data) and calculating the Pearson's correlation coefficient between them. The median Pearson's correlation coefficient ranged from 0.90–0.94 for the common species, rare species, common genes, and rare genes matrices. As the correctly and incorrectly transformed matrices are highly correlated, this error has negligible impact on the variance component analysis results and does not change the overall conclusions of our work. The code error did not affect which microbiome features were identified as being differentially abundant, as the method used for this analysis (ANCOMv2.1) takes un-transformed count data as input. However, the data visualization for this analysis was affected with respect to the x-axes of Figures 3A–3C, 3E, 3F, and S4, which reflect the degree and directionality of differential abundance. In the updated plots, all the significant or near-significant microbiome features have identical directions of effect to the original plots as well as similar magnitudes of effect. We can confirm that the other instances of clr transformation were performed correctly; namely, in generating the dietary PCs, CD4+ T cells, and the PCA plot (Figure 5A). We have updated the following: (1) Figure 2 has been amended with the updated data: • Under age, species_common has changed from 33 to 35, transporter(TCDB)_common from 42 to 36, pathway(MetaCyc)_common from 40 to 39, and food(AES) from 33 to 46.• Under BMI, species, transporter(TCDB)_common has changed from 1 to 4, pathway(MetaCyc)_common from 0 to 1, genes(Microba)_common from 7 to 10, and food(AES) from 12 to 22.• Under ASD, genes(Microba)_rare has changed from 7 to 9.• Under IQ_DQ, species_common has changed from 3 to 5, genes(Microba)_common from 7 to 14, and food(AES) from 3 to 14.• Under Sleep, species_common has changed from 10 to 11, and genes(Microba)_common has changed from 0 to 6.• Under rBSC, species_common has changed from 5 to 6, species_rare from 41 to 40, transporter(TCDB)_common from 3 to 4, and genes(Microba)_common from 49 to 50.• Under dietary_PC1, enzyme(ECL4)_common has changed from 48 to 46, pathway(MetaCyc)_common from 25 to 24, and genes(Microba)_common from 48 to 47.• Under dietary_PC2, species_rare has changed from 1 to 0, genes(Microba)_common from 7 to 8, and genes(Microba)_rare from 3 to 0.• Under dietary_PC3, species_common has changed from 4 to 6, species_rare from 1 to 0, transporter(TCDB)_common from 21 to 17, pathway(MetaCyc)_common from 11 to 10, and genes(Microba)_common from 27 to 28.• Under diet_diversity, species_rare has changed from 20 to 14, transporter(TCDB)_common from 26 to 23, and genes(Microba)_common from 26 to 23.• We have also taken this opportunity to switch the y-axis order for “species_rare” and “enzyme(ECL4)_common” to better separate the taxonomic and functional datasets.(2) Table S1, which contains the raw data presented in Figure 2, has been amended with the updated OREML results.(3) In the main text, the third to fifth paragraphs of the section titled “Negligible variance in ASD diagnostic status is associated with the microbiome compared to age, stool and dietary traits” has been amended: • The age common species b2 estimate and standard error has changed from 33% (SE = 8%) to 35% (SE = 7%).• The p value for the BMI common species analysis has changed from p = 3.5e-2 (not FDR significant) to 1.8e-2 (FDR-significant).• With reference to the age gene-level ORM analyses, the range of standard errors has been changed from 13%–17% to 14%–17%.• The BMI rare genes b2 estimate has changed from 46% to 47%, and the p value has changed from 8.4e-3 to 1.1e-2.• The ASD rare genes b2 estimate has changed from 7% to 9%, and the p value has changed from 0.33 to 0.29.• The IQ-DQ common species b2 estimate has changed from 7% (SE = 13%, p = 0.39) to 5% (SE = 6%, p = 0.20).• The sleep problems common species b2 estimate has changed from 10% to 11%, and the p value has changed from 0.17 to 8.2e-2.• The stool consistency rare species b2 estimate has changed from 41% to 40%, and the p value has changed from 8.7e-6 to 2.8e-5.• The stool consistency rare genes standard error has changed from 20% to 21%, and the p value has changed from 2.5e-5 to 5.8e-5.• We have corrected an error where the dietary PC1 common genes b2 estimate (b2 = 48%, SE = 15%, p = 3.8e-4) was mislabeled as the rare genes analysis. We have also updated the common genes b2 estimate from 48% to 47% and updated the p value from 3.8e-4 to 4.5e-5.(4) Figure S1, which visualizes the diagonals and off-diagonals of the omics relationship matrix (ORM; which, in turn, is based on the centered-log-ratio transformed microbiome matrices) has been amended with the updated OREML results.(5) Figure S2, which draws upon ORMs using rare microbiome features to compare the effects of prior clr transformation versus binary coding as a sensitivity analysis, has been amended with the updated OREML results.(6) Figure S3, which provides a variety of OREML estimates to support Figure 2 (including the impact of estimating b2 with a combination of multiple ORMs and collapsing taxonomic microbiome data into higher levels of hierarchy), has been amended with the updated OREML results.(7) Methods S1, which provides results from extensive sensitivity analyses to support the main results, has also been amended with the updated OREML results. We have also updated the section “Estimating the upper limit of predictivity using non-additive models,” for which we used adaboost as a sensitivity analysis for a method that does not assume additivity. In this analysis, the mean prediction accuracy for ASD changed from 53% (SD = 7%) to 53% (SD = 8%), and the prediction accuracy for age changed from 62% (SD = 7%) to 63% (SD = 9%).(8) Figures 3A–3C, 3E, and 3F, which visualize differentially abundant microbiome features, now have updated x-axes.(9) Figure S4, which supports Figure 3 by providing results from sensitivity analyses for differential abundance, also has updated x-axes.(10) Tables S2.1, S2.3, S2.8, S2.13, and S2.14, which provide data (including x-axis coordinates) for Figures 3A–3C, 3E, and 3F, have been updated.(11) Unrelated to the clr transformation error, we have also updated the heading of the upper plot in Figure 4I to read “Diet ∼ Sensory score” rather than “Taxa ∼ Sensory score.”(12) The accompanying Zenodo code has been updated, and the link has been changed from https://zenodo.org/records/5558047 to https://zenodo.org/records/5558046. The specific code updates can be viewed on the linked GitHub page.These errors have now been corrected in the online version of the paper. We apologize for any inconvenience that this may have caused the readers.[Formula</p

Interactions between the lipidome and genetic and environmental factors in autism

Autism omics research has historically been reductionist and diagnosis centric, with little attention paid to common co-occurring conditions (for example, sleep and feeding disorders) and the complex interplay between molecular profiles and neurodevelopment, genetics, environmental factors and health. Here we explored the plasma lipidome (783 lipid species) in 765 children (485 diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder (ASD)) within the Australian Autism Biobank. We identified lipids associated with ASD diagnosis (n = 8), sleep disturbances (n = 20) and cognitive function (n = 8) and found that long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids may causally contribute to sleep disturbances mediated by the FADS gene cluster. We explored the interplay of environmental factors with neurodevelopment and the lipidome, finding that sleep disturbances and unhealthy diet have a convergent lipidome profile (with potential mediation by the microbiome) that is also independently associated with poorer adaptive function. In contrast, ASD lipidome differences were accounted for by dietary differences and sleep disturbances. We identified a large chr19p13.2 copy number variant genetic deletion spanning the LDLR gene and two high-confidence ASD genes (ELAVL3 and SMARCA4) in one child with an ASD diagnosis and widespread low-density lipoprotein-related lipidome derangements. Lipidomics captures the complexity of neurodevelopment, as well as the biological effects of conditions that commonly affect quality of life among autistic people.</p