A Multi-Objective Scheduling Policy for Edge Serverless Platforms

International audienc

A Multi-Objective Scheduling Policy for Edge Serverless Platforms

International audienc

Cost of care pathways before and after appropriate and inappropriate transfers to the emergency department among nursing home residents: results from the FINE study

Abstract Background Transfers of nursing home (NH) residents to the emergency department (ED) is frequent. Our main objective was to assess the cost of care pathways 6 months before and after the transfer to the emergency department among NH residents, according to the type of transfer (i.e. appropriate or inappropriate). Methods This was a part of an observational, multicenter, case-control study: the Factors associated with INappropriate transfer to the Emergency department among nursing home residents (FINE) study. Sixteen public hospitals of the former Midi-Pyrénées region participated in recruitment, in 2016. During the inclusion period, all NH residents arriving at the ED were included. A pluri-disciplinary team categorized each transfer to the ED into 2 groups: appropriate or inappropriate. Direct medical and nonmedical costs were assessed from the French Health Insurance (FHI) perspective. Healthcare resources were retrospectively gathered from the FHI database and valued using the tariffs reimbursed by the FHI. Costs were recorded over a 6-month period before and after transfer to the ED. Other variables were used for analysis: sex, age, Charlson score, season, death and presence inside the NH of a coordinating physician or a geriatric nursing assistant. Results Among the 1037 patients initially included in the FINE study, 616 who were listed in the FHI database were included in this economic study. Among them, 132 (21.4%) had an inappropriate transfer to the ED. In the 6 months before ED transfer, total direct costs on average amounted to 8,145€ vs. 6,493€ in the inappropriate and appropriate transfer groups, respectively. In the 6 months after ED transfer, they amounted on average to 9,050€ vs. 12,094€. Conclusions Total costs on average are higher after transfer to the ED, but there is no significant increase in healthcare expenditure with inappropriate ED transfer. Support for NH staff and better pathways of care could be necessary to reduce healthcare expenditures in NH residents. Trial registration clinicaltrials.gov, NCT02677272

untitled

Hoyosella altamirensis gen. nov., sp. nov., a new member of the order Actinomycetales isolated from a cave biofilm A number of novel bacterial taxa have been isolated from caves and described in recent years. The new genera and species described belong mainly to the suborders Corynebacterineae, Pseudonocardineae and Micrococcineae T . This strain was collected as a member of the complex microbial community that produces the white colonies, isolated or in masses of hundreds on the cave ceiling and walls. Strain OFN S31 T was isolated on starch-casein agar at 28 uC but also grew on brain heart infusion (BHI; Difco), Bennett's agar (Jones, 1949) and trypticase soy agar (TSA; The GenBank/EMBL/DDBJ accession number for the 16S rRNA gene sequence of strain OFN S31 T is FJ179485. The cellular fatty acid profile of strain OFN S31 T is available as supplementary material with the online version of this paper

Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation of a Remote Monitoring Programme Including Lifestyle Education Software in Type 2 Diabetes: Results of the Educ@dom Study

Erratum inCorrection to: Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation of a Remote Monitoring Programme Including Lifestyle Education Software in Type 2 Diabetes: Results of the Educ@dom Study.Mounié M, Costa N, Gourdy P, Latorre C, Schirr-Bonnans S, Lagarrigue JM, Roussel H, Martini J, Buisson JC, Chauchard MC, Delaunay J, Taoui S, Poncet MF, Cosma V, Lablanche S, Coustols-Valat M, Chaillous L, Thivolet C, Sanz C, Penfornis A, Lepage B, Colineaux H, Hanaire H, Molinier L, Turnin MC; Educ@dom Study Group, Benhamou PY, Rodier M, Ayon F, Puel-Olivier F, Fontaine S, Perron M, Arrivié J, Cousty-Pech F, Rouby C, Lafon F, Moura I.Diabetes Ther. 2022 May;13(5):1131-1132. doi: 10.1007/s13300-022-01248-6.PMID: 35316510 Free PMC article. No abstract available.International audienceINTRODUCTION: Telemedicine programs using health technological innovation to remotely monitor the lifestyles of patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) can improve glycaemic control and thus reduce the incidence of complications as well as management costs. In this context, an assessment was made of the 1-year and 2-year cost-effectiveness of the EDUC@DOM telemonitoring and tele-education program. METHODS: The EDUC@DOM study was a multicentre randomized controlled trial conducted between 2013 and 2017 that compared a telemonitoring group (TMG) to a control group (CG) merged with health insurance databases to extract economic data on resource consumption. Economic analysis was performed from the payer perspective, and direct costs and indirect costs were considered. The clinical outcome used was the intergroup change in glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) levels from baseline. Missing economic data were imputed using multiple imputation, and fitted values from a generalized linear mixed model were used to calculate the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). Bootstrapped 95% confidence ellipses were drawn in the cost-effectiveness plan. RESULTS: The main analysis included data from 256 patients: 126 in the TMG and 130 in the CG. Incremental costs over 1 and 2 years were equal to €2129 and €5101, respectively, in favour of the TMG. Once imputed and adjusted for confounding factors, the TMG trends to a 21% cost decrease over 1 and 2 years of follow-up (0.79 [0.58; 1.08], p = 0.1452 and 0.79 [0.61; 1.03], p = 0.0879, respectively). The EDUC@DOM program led to a €1334 cost saving and a 0.17 decrease in HbA1c over 1 year and a €3144 cost saving and a 0.14 decrease in HbA1c over 2 years. According to the confidence ellipse, EDUC@DOM was a cost-effective strategy. CONCLUSION: This study provides additional economic information on telemonitoring and tele-education programs to enhance their acceptance and promote their use. In the light of this work, the EDUC@DOM program is a cost-saving strategy in T2D management. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial was registered in the Clinical Trials Database on 27 September 2013 under no. NCT01955031 and bears ID-RCB no. 2013-A00391-44