171 research outputs found

    Arlington Park, City of Greensboro, Guilford County, North Carolina : an action-oriented community diagnosis : findings and suggested next steps of action

    Get PDF
    During 2003-2004, a team of four graduate students from the Department of Health Behavior and Health Education at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Public Health conducted an Action-Oriented Community Diagnosis (AOCD) in Arlington Park, a neighborhood in Southeast Greensboro, North Carolina. This process was conducted under the guidance of the course instructors and Bertha Sims, a former community resident who served as the team’s preceptor. This document is intended to provide a history of the neighborhood, as well as describe the AOCD process and the information it yielded. The document begins with an overview of the history of Arlington Park, an explanation of its demographic transition, and a brief summary of recent events in the neighborhood. This is followed by a description of the AOCD process and the methods used by the student team to conduct the community diagnosis. An analysis of interview data resulted in the emergence of six themes: inaccessibility of health services and information; a lack of businesses located within or near the neighborhood, and limited knowledge regarding the social services offered outside of it; frustrations with the educational system, and a lack of recreational activities for youth; the challenges surrounding drug- and prostitution-related crime, and the neighborhood’s positive relationship with local law enforcement; abandoned homes and absentee landlords; and, community assets and leaders. The concluding section briefly summarizes the themes and limitations of the process, and offers suggestions for the future. There was considerable agreement between interviewees regarding the community’s strengths and assets, as well as the challenges facing Arlington Park. Solutions to these challenges have yet to be determined; however, both service providers and community members appeared committed to positive change. It is, therefore, the team’s hope that this document will be a useful resource for those working in Arlington Park in the future.Master of Public Healt

    Do Price Subsidies on Artemisinin Combination Therapy for Malaria Increase Household Use?: Evidence from a Repeated Cross-Sectional Study in Remote Regions of Tanzania

    Get PDF
    Background: The Affordable Medicines Facility-malaria (AMFm) is a pilot program that uses price subsidies to increase access to Artemisinin Combination Therapies (ACTs), currently the most effective malaria treatment. Recent evidence suggests that availability and affordability of ACTs in retail sector drug shops (where many people treat malaria) has increased under the AMFm, but it is unclear whether household level ACT use has increased. Methods and Findings: Household surveys were conducted in two remote regions of Tanzania (Mtwara and Rukwa) in three waves: March 2011, December 2011 and March 2012, corresponding to 3, 13 and 16 months into the AMFm implementation respectively. Information about suspected malaria episodes including treatment location and medications taken was collected. Respondents were also asked about antimalarial preferences and perceptions about the availability of these medications. Significant increases in ACT use, preference and perceived availability were found between Rounds 1 and 3 though not for all measures between Rounds 1 and 2. ACT use among suspected malaria episodes was 51.1% in March 2011 and increased by 10.9 percentage points by Round 3 (p = .017). The greatest increase was among retail sector patients, where ACT use increased from 31% in Round 1 to 49% in Round 2 (p = .037) and to 61% (p<.0001) by Round 3. The fraction of suspected malaria episodes treated in the retail sector increased from 30.2% in Round 1 to 46.7% in Round 3 (p = .0009), mostly due to a decrease in patients who sought no treatment at all. No significant changes in public sector treatment seeking were found. Conclusions: The AMFm has led to significant increases in ACT use for suspected malaria, especially in the retail sector. No evidence is found supporting the concerns that the AMFm would crowd out public sector treatment or neglect patients in remote areas and from low SES groups

    Countdown to 2015 country case studies: what have we learned about processes and progress towards MDGs 4 and 5?

    Get PDF
    BACKGROUND: Countdown to 2015 was a multi-institution consortium tracking progress towards Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) 4 and 5. Case studies to explore factors contributing to progress (or lack of progress) in reproductive, maternal, newborn and child health (RMNCH) were undertaken in: Afghanistan, Bangladesh, China, Ethiopia, Kenya, Malawi, Niger, Pakistan, Peru, and Tanzania. This paper aims to identify cross-cutting themes on how and why these countries achieved or did not achieve MDG progress. METHODS: Applying a standard evaluation framework, analyses of impact, coverage and equity were undertaken, including a mixed methods analysis of how these were influenced by national context and coverage determinants (including health systems, policies and financing). RESULTS: The majority (7/10) of case study countries met MDG-4 with over two-thirds reduction in child mortality, but none met MDG-5a for 75 % reduction in maternal mortality, although six countries achieved >75 % of this target. None achieved MDG-5b regarding reproductive health. Rates of reduction in neonatal mortality were half or less that for post-neonatal child mortality. Coverage increased most for interventions administered at lower levels of the health system (e.g., immunisation, insecticide treated nets), and these experienced substantial political and financial support. These interventions were associated with ~30-40 % of child lives saved in 2012 compared to 2000, in Ethiopia, Malawi, Peru and Tanzania. Intrapartum care for mothers and newborns -- which require higher-level health workers, more infrastructure, and increased community engagement -- showed variable increases in coverage, and persistent equity gaps. Countries have explored different approaches to address these problems, including shifting interventions to the community setting and tasks to lower-level health workers. CONCLUSIONS: These Countdown case studies underline the importance of consistent national investment and global attention for achieving improvements in RMNCH. Interventions with major global investments achieved higher levels of coverage, reduced equity gaps and improvements in associated health outcomes. Given many competing priorities for the Sustainable Development Goals era, it is essential to maintain attention to the unfinished RMNCH agenda, particularly health systems improvements for maternal and neonatal outcomes where progress has been slower, and to invest in data collection for monitoring progress and for rigorous analyses of how progress is achieved in different contexts
    • …
    corecore