Correction to:A Multi-stage Representation of Cell Proliferation as a Markov Process

The original version of this article unfortunately contained a mistake. It has been corrected with this correction. Equations (9) and (10) were transcribed incorrectly. Equation (9) originally read (Formula Presented.) In fact, we should first have introduced scaled variables m j = Mj ekt/C, for j = 1, . . . , k. Equation (9) should then have read (Formula Presented.).</p

Using approximate Bayesian computation to quantify cell-cell adhesion parameters in a cell migratory process

In this work we implement approximate Bayesian computational methods to improve the design of a wound-healing assay used to quantify cell-cell interactions. This is important as cell-cell interactions, such as adhesion and repulsion, have been shown to play an important role in cell migration. Initially, we demonstrate with a model of an ideal experiment that we are able to identify model parameters for agent motility and adhesion, given we choose appropriate summary statistics. Following this, we replace our model of an ideal experiment with a model representative of a practically realisable experiment. We demonstrate that, given the current (and commonly used) experimental set-up, model parameters cannot be accurately identified using approximate Bayesian computation methods. We compare new experimental designs through simulation, and show more accurate identification of model parameters is possible by expanding the size of the domain upon which the experiment is performed, as opposed to increasing the number of experimental repeats. The results presented in this work therefore describe time and cost-saving alterations for a commonly performed experiment for identifying cell motility parameters. Moreover, the results presented in this work will be of interest to those concerned with performing experiments that allow for the accurate identification of parameters governing cell migratory processes, especially cell migratory processes in which cell-cell adhesion or repulsion are known to play a significant role

IMHOTEP A composite score integrating popular tools for predicting the functional consequences of non-synonymous sequence variants

The in silico prediction of the functional consequences of mutations is an important goal of human pathogenetics. However, bioinformatic tools that classify mutations according to their functionality employ different algorithms so that predictions may vary markedly between tools. We therefore integrated nine popular prediction tools (PolyPhen-2, SNPs&GO, MutPred, SIFT, MutationTaster2, Mutation Assessor and FATHMM as well as conservation-based Grantham Score and PhyloP) into a single predictor. The optimal combination of these tools was selected by means of a wide range of statistical modeling techniques, drawing upon 10 029 disease-causing single nucleotide variants (SNVs) from Human Gene Mutation Database and 10 002 putatively ‘benign’ non-synonymous SNVs from UCSC. Predictive performance was found to be markedly improved by model-based integration, whilst maximum predictive capability was obtained with either random forest, decision tree or logistic regression analysis. A combination of PolyPhen-2, SNPs&GO, MutPred, MutationTaster2 and FATHMM was found to perform as well as all tools combined. Comparison of our approach with other integrative approaches such as Condel, CoVEC, CAROL, CADD, MetaSVM and MetaLR using an independent validation dataset, revealed the superiority of our newly proposed integrative approach. An online implementation of this approach, IMHOTEP (‘Integrating Molecular Heuristics and Other Tools for Effect Prediction’), is provided at http://www.uni-kiel.de/medinfo/cgi-bin/predictor/

Using approximate Bayesian computation to quantify cell-cell adhesion parameters in a cell migratory process

In this work we implement approximate Bayesian computational methods to improve the design of a wound-healing assay used to quantify cell-cell interactions. This is important as cell-cell interactions, such as adhesion and repulsion, have been shown to play a role in cell migration. Initially, we demonstrate with a model of an unrealistic experiment that we are able to identify model parameters that describe agent motility and adhesion, given we choose appropriate summary statistics for our model data. Following this, we replace our model of an unrealistic experiment with a model representative of a practically realisable experiment. We demonstrate that, given the current (and commonly used) experimental set-up, our model parameters cannot be accurately identified using approximate Bayesian computation methods. We compare new experimental designs through simulation, and show more accurate identification of model parameters is possible by expanding the size of the domain upon which the experiment is performed, as opposed to increasing the number of experimental replicates. The results presented in this work therefore describe time and cost-saving alterations for a commonly performed experiment for identifying cell motility parameters. Moreover, this work will be of interest to those concerned with performing experiments that allow for the accurate identification of parameters governing cell migratory processes, especially cell migratory processes in which cell-cell adhesion or repulsion are known to play a significant role

The Human Gene Mutation Database: towards a comprehensive repository of inherited mutation data for medical research, genetic diagnosis and next-generation sequencing studies

The Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD®) constitutes a comprehensive collection of published germline mutations in nuclear genes that underlie, or are closely associated with human inherited disease. At the time of writing (March 2017), the database contained in excess of 203,000 different gene lesions identified in over 8000 genes manually curated from over 2600 journals. With new mutation entries currently accumulating at a rate exceeding 17,000 per annum, HGMD represents de facto the central unified gene/disease-oriented repository of heritable mutations causing human genetic disease used worldwide by researchers, clinicians, diagnostic laboratories and genetic counsellors, and is an essential tool for the annotation of next-generation sequencing data. The public version of HGMD (http://www.hgmd.org) is freely available to registered users from academic institutions and non-profit organisations whilst the subscription version (HGMD Professional) is available to academic, clinical and commercial users under license via QIAGEN Inc

Discriminating between disease-causing and neutral non-frameshifting micro-INDELs by support vector machines by means of integrated sequence- and structure-based features

poster abstractMicro-INDELs (insertions or deletions of ≤20 bp) constitute the second most frequent class of human gene mutation after single nucleotide variants. A significant portion of exonic INDELs are non-frameshifting (NFS), serving to insert or delete a discrete number of amino-acid residues. Despite the relative abundance of NFS-INDELs, their damaging effect on protein structure and function has gone largely unstudied whilst bioinformatics tools for discriminating between disease-causing and neutral NFS-INDELs remain to be developed. We have developed such a technique (DDIG-in; Detecting DIsease-causing Genetic variations due to INDELs) by comparing the properties of disease-causing NFS-INDELs from the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD) with putatively neutral NFS-INDELs from the 1,000 Genomes Project. Having considered 58 different sequence- and structure-based features, we found that predicted disordered regions around the NFS-INDEL region had the highest discriminative capability (disease versus neutral) with an Area Under the receiver-operating characteristic Curve (AUC) of 0.82 and a Matthews Correlation Coefficient (MCC) of 0.56. All features studied were combined by support vector machines (SVM) and selected by a greedy algorithm. The resulting SVM models were trained and tested by ten-fold cross-validation on the microdeletion dataset and independently tested on the microinsertion dataset and vice versa. The final SVM model for determining NFS-INDEL disease-causing probability was built on non-redundant datasets with a protein sequence identity cutoff of 35% and yielded an MCC value of 0.68, an accuracy of 84% and an AUC of 0.89. Predicted disease-causing probabilities exhibited a strong negative correlation with the average minor allele frequency (correlation coefficient, -0.84). DDIG-in, available at http://sparks.informatics.iupui.edu, can be used to estimate the disease-causing probability for a given NFS-INDEL