5 research outputs found
Dental implants rehabilitation in a patient with head and neck radiotherapy for osteosarcoma in the jaw. A clinical case report
A 52-year-old female patient with a diagnostic of osteosarcoma in the mandible, in which it was necessary a reconstruction with a microvascularized osteomyocutaneous fibula bone. Coadjuvant chemotherapy was scheduled. Two years later, 4 osseointegrated implants (OII) were placed in the fibula a 2 OII in the right mandible, using a splint guided surgery. The final prosthodontic consisted in a metal ceramic restoration using CAD/ CAM technology
Jaw in a day: Osseointegration of the implants in the patient’s leg before reconstructive surgery of a maxilla with ameloblastoma. A 4-year follow-up case report
Background: To describe a clinical case of a cancer patient who underwent ablative tumor surgery, including treatment planning, surgical resection and subsequent implant rehabilitation. Case Report: A 61-year-old patient with a diagnosis of multicystic follicular ameloblastoma in the maxilla, in which it was necessary a muitidisciplinary approach and two surgical steps. In the first surgical intervention osseo-integrated implants (OII) were placed in the fibula, until their osseointegration period of 8 weeks was complete. Afterwards, in the second surgery, the micro-vascularized free fibular flap bearing the implants was transplanted into the oral cavity, in order to perform simultaneous reconstruction and early rehabilitation. The final prosthetic rehabilitation consisted in a hybrid prosthesis fabricated using CAD CAM technology. Results: The latest advances in medical research have improved our understanding of the oral cavity’s regenerative capacity after oncological treatment. This, aided by the advances in digital 3D technologies, has allowed meticulous treatment planning prior surgery. Conclusions: The functional and esthetic reconstructions described in these two case reports were made possible by coordinating multidisciplinary approaches involving dentists and oral and maxillofacial surgeons. Advances in medicine have improved understanding of the regenerative capacity of the oral region following oncologic treatment, facilitating meticulous advance planning, while advances in digital 3D technologies for planning make it possible to reduce the number of surgical sessions and the time taken for the patient to recover both the esthetics and function of the stomatognathic system
ApicectomĂa quirĂşrgica: propuesta de un protocolo basado en la evidencia
ResumenDiversos refinamientos de la tĂ©cnica quirĂşrgica de apicectomĂa han propiciado que su tasa de Ă©xito haya aumentado de modo considerable. Se revisa la bibliografĂa cientĂfica para determinar cuáles de estos procedimientos son superiores. Se realiza un protocolo que aĂşna racionalmente esas tĂ©cnicas, con lo que asĂ se optimiza el resultado final de la intervenciĂłn.AbstractDiverse refinements of the apicoectomy surgical technique have considerably increased the success rate of the procedure. The scientific literature was reviewed to identify the most relevant procedures for the final outcome of surgery. A protocol was prepared to facilitate the rational selection of technique, thus optimizing the surgical outcome
Virtual Surgical Planning and Customized Subperiosteal Titanium Maxillary Implant (CSTMI) for Three Dimensional Reconstruction and Dental Implants of Maxillary Defects after Oncological Resection: Case Series
Maxillectomies cause malocclusion, masticatory disorders, swallowing disorders and poor nasolabial projection, with consequent esthetic and functional sequelae. Reconstruction can be achieved with conventional approaches, such as closure of the maxillary defect by microvascular free flap surgery or prosthetic obturation. Four patients with segmental maxillary defects that had been reconstructed with customized subperiosteal titanium maxillary implants (CSTMI) through virtual surgical planning (VSP), STL models and CAD/CAM titanium mesh were included. The smallest maxillary defect was 4.1 cm and the largest defect was 9.6 cm, with an average of 7.1 cm. The reconstructed maxillary vertical dimension ranged from 9.3 mm to 17.4 mm, with a mean of 13.17 mm. The transverse dimension of the maxilla at the crestal level was attempted to be reconstructed based on the pre-excision CT scan, and these measurements ranged from 6.5 mm in the premaxilla area to 14.6 mm at the posterior level. All patients were rehabilitated with a fixed prosthesis on subperiosteal implants with good esthetic and functional results. In conclusion, we believe that customized subperiosteal titanium maxillary implants (CSTMI) are a safe alternative for maxillary defects reconstruction, allowing for simultaneous dental rehabilitation while restoring midface projection. Nonetheless, prospective and randomized trials are required with long-term follow-up, to assess its long-term performance and safety