Genetic Basis of Myocarditis: Myth or Reality?

n/

Parvovirus B19 DNA detectable in hearts of patients with dilated cardiomyopathy, but absent or inactive in blood

Abstract Aims Parvovirus B19 (B19V) is often assumed to be a cause of dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM), based on the quantification of B19V DNA in endomyocardial biopsies (EMB). Whether the presence of B19V DNA correlates with active infection is still debated. Application of the enzyme endonuclease to blood samples results in degradation of B19V DNA remnants but leaves viral particles intact, which enables differentiation between active and past infection. In this study, the susceptibility to degradation by endonuclease of B19V DNA in blood was compared between DCM patients and a control group of recent B19V infections. Methods and results Twenty blood samples from 20 adult patients with DCM, who previously tested positive for B19V DNA in EMB and/or blood, were tested with B19V PCR before and after application of endonuclease to the samples. Six blood samples tested positive for B19V DNA with a mean viral load of 2.3 × 104 IU/mL. In five samples, B19V DNA became undetectable after endonuclease (100% load reduction); in one sample DNA load showed a 23% log load reduction (viral load before endonuclease: 9.1 × 104 IU/mL; after: 6.5 × 103 IU/mL). Presence of cardiac inflammation did not differ between patients with B19V DNAemia (1/4) and patients without B19V DNAemia (6/14) (P value = 1.0). In all 18 control samples of proven recent B19V infections, DNA remained detectable after application of endonuclease, showing only a mean log load reduction of 2.3% (mean viral load before endonuclease: 8.1 × 1011 IU/mL; after: 8.0 × 1011 IU/mL). Load reduction differed significantly between the DCM group and the control group; indicating the presence of intact viral particles in the control group with proven active infection and the presence of DNA remnants in the DCM group (P value = 0.000). Conclusion During recent B19V infection, viral DNA levels in blood were unaffected by endonuclease. In contrast, B19V DNA in blood in patients with DCM became undetectable or strongly reduced after application of endonuclease. Circulating viral DNA in this subset of patients with presumed parvovirus‐associated DCM does not consist of intact viral particles. Viral replicative activity cannot be assumed from demonstrating B19V DNA in cardiac tissue or in blood in DCM patients

Detection of parvovirus B19 DNA in blood: Viruses or DNA remnants?

Molecular basis of virus replication, viral pathogenesis and antiviral strategie

Parvovirus B19 DNA detectable in hearts of patients with dilated cardiomyopathy, but absent or inactive in blood

Aims Parvovirus B19 (B19V) is often assumed to be a cause of dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM), based on the quantification of B19V DNA in endomyocardial biopsies (EMB). Whether the presence of B19V DNA correlates with active infection is still debated. Application of the enzyme endonuclease to blood samples results in degradation of B19V DNA remnants but leaves viral particles intact, which enables differentiation between active and past infection. In this study, the susceptibility to degradation by endonuclease of B19V DNA in blood was compared between DCM patients and a control group of recent B19V infections.Methods and results Twenty blood samples from 20 adult patients with DCM, who previously tested positive for B19V DNA in EMB and/or blood, were tested with B19V PCR before and after application of endonuclease to the samples. Six blood samples tested positive for B19V DNA with a mean viral load of 2.3 x 10(4) IU/mL. In five samples, B19V DNA became undetectable after endonuclease (100% load reduction); in one sample DNA load showed a 23% log load reduction (viral load before endonuclease: 9.1 x 10(4) IU/mL; after: 6.5 x 10(3) IU/mL). Presence of cardiac inflammation did not differ between patients with B19V DNAemia (1/4) and patients without B19V DNAemia (6/14) (P value = 1.0). In all 18 control samples of proven recent B19V infections, DNA remained detectable after application of endonuclease, showing only a mean log load reduction of 2.3% (mean viral load before endonuclease: 8.1 x 10(11) IU/mL; after: 8.0 x 10(11) IU/mL). Load reduction differed significantly between the DCM group and the control group; indicating the presence of intact viral particles in the control group with proven active infection and the presence of DNA remnants in the DCM group (P value = 0.000).Conclusion During recent B19V infection, viral DNA levels in blood were unaffected by endonuclease. In contrast, B19V DNA in blood in patients with DCM became undetectable or strongly reduced after application of endonuclease. Circulating viral DNA in this subset of patients with presumed parvovirus-associated DCM does not consist of intact viral particles. Viral replicative activity cannot be assumed from demonstrating B19V DNA in cardiac tissue or in blood in DCM patients

Transient Parvovirus B19 DNAemia after Kidney Transplantation: A 2-Sided Story

Parvovirus B19 (B19V) DNAemia appears to be a relatively common finding after kidney transplantation. However, not all DNAemia signifies active infection with replicating virus. This study screened 134 patients posttransplantation for B19V DNAemia and identified 2 cases in which viral DNA was present after transplantation, with the donor kidney as probable source of the DNA. In both cases intact viral particles could not be detected using an endonuclease method, indicating the presence of noninfectious DNA remnants

Blood donor screening in the Netherlands: Universal anti-HBc screening in combination with HBV nucleic acid amplification testing may allow discontinuation of hepatitis B virus antigen testing

Background: In the Netherlands, blood donor screening for hepatitis B virus (HBV) consists of HBsAg screening since the 1970s, HBV DNA minipool testing (MP-NAT) since 2008, and anti-HBc screening since 2011. Anti-HBc reactivity causes deferral only if anti-HBs titers are <200 IU/mL, or when anti-HBc was acquired during follow-up. Study design and methods: Over 5.5 million donations from 582,459 Dutch donors were screened for HBV DNA, HBsAg, anti-HBc, and, if anti-HBc positive, also for anti-HBs. The added value, expressed as the yield of (potentially) infectious and/or recent HBV infections versus unnecessary donor loss, was evaluated for each of the three HBV screening tests. Results: HBV donor screening identified 89 HBV-infected donors with at least two reactive HBV markers (MP-NAT, HBsAg and/or anti-HBc). Single HBV-marker yield was: 5 MP-NAT-only, 0 HBsAg-only, and 20 anti-HBc-only donors. In addition, anti-HBc screening yielded 1,067 potentially infectious donors at risk for occult HBV infection (OBI). In total, 4,126 (0.71%) donors were anti-HBc-reactive at first-time screening, and 1,098 (0.19%) seroconverted during follow-up. Anti-HBc-related donor loss was limited to 2,627 (0.45%) donors using anti-HBs titers and two-strike programs. Donor loss due to MP-NAT and HBsAg screening was extremely low: 0 and 128 donors, respectively. Conclusion: HBV donor screening could be limited to MP-NAT and anti-HBc screening. MP-NAT and anti-HBc improved blood safety by intercepting infectious donations from donors with recent infection or OBI, while HBsAg did not. Unnecessary donor loss related to anti-HBc screening is substantial but does not endanger the continuity of the blood supply

The yield of universal antibody to hepatitis B core antigen donor screening in the Netherlands, a hepatitis B virus low-endemic country

In the Netherlands, universal antibody to hepatitis B core antigen (anti-HBc) donor screening was introduced in July 2011 to intercept potentially infectious donations slipping through hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) and hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA minipool screening (HBV DNA MP6). The yield and donor loss were evaluated after the first 2 years of universal anti-HBc donor screening. A total of 382,173 donors were tested for anti-HBc and, if positive, for antibody to HBsAg (anti-HBs). Anti-HBc-reactive donors with anti-HBs of less than 200 IU/L were deferred, but repeat donors were allowed retesting after 6 months if anti-HBs was less than 10 IU/mL. Anti-HBc false positivity was estimated using the crude anti-HBc signal, family name-based ethnicity scoring, and donor follow-up. Anti-HBc screening identified 13 confirmed or potential HBsAg- and HBV DNA MP6-negative recent HBV infections. In addition, 820 anti-HBc-reactive donors with low anti-HBs titers ( <200 IU/mL), potentially harboring occult HBV infection (OBI), were identified and deferred. Overall, 1583 (0.41%) donors were deferred: 1178 (0.31%) during first-time anti-HBc screening, 361 (0.09%) anti-HBc seroconverters, and 44 (0.01%) donors with waning anti-HBs titers. Only 188 of 1583 (12%) deferred donors could be reentered upon retesting. Estimated anti-HBc false positivity was 16%, but varied greatly among anti-HBc-reactive donors with and without anti-HBs (8% vs. 62%). Anti-HBc testing has improved the safety of the Dutch blood supply but its exact yield remains difficult to determine, due to the complexity of confirming anti-HBc reactivity and OBI. In a low-endemic country, donor loss associated with anti-HBc screening is sustainable, but adds to the already considerable list of donor exclusion

Incidence and duration of hepatitis E virus infection in Dutch blood donors

The incidence of hepatitis E virus (HEV) infection in the Netherlands is high. Blood donors are not routinely screened for HEV infection, but since January 2013, donations used for the production of solvent/detergent (S/D)-treated plasma have been screened for HEV RNA. Donations were screened for HEV RNA in pools of 96 and 192 donations. In addition, all donations made between 60 days before and after each HEV RNA-positive donation were tested individually for HEV RNA and anti-HEV immunoglobulin G. The screening of 59,474 donations between January 2013 and December 2014 resulted in identification of 45 HEV RNA-positive donations (0.076%) from 41 donors. HEV RNA loads ranged from 80 to 2.3 × 10(6) IU/mL. The number of positive donations increased significantly over time (p = 0.03). Thirty-three of 90 donations made up to 60 days before or after HEV RNA-positive donations were positive when tested individually, while they had not been detected in the pool screening. The mean duration of HEV viremia in the healthy blood donor is estimated to be 68 days. The incidence of HEV infection in the Netherlands is high and increased during the study period. In 2013 and 2014, HEV RNA was detected in 1 per 762 donations intended for production of S/D plasm