136 research outputs found
A dynamic programming approach to constrained portfolios
This paper studies constrained portfolio problems that may involve constraints on the probability or the expected size of a shortfall of wealth or consumption. Our first contribution is that we solve the problems by dynamic programming, which is in contrast to the existing literature that applies the martingale method. More precisely, we construct the non-separable value function by formalizing the optimal constrained terminal wealth to be a (conjectured) contingent claim on the optimal non-constrained terminal wealth. This is relevant by itself, but also opens up the opportunity to derive new solutions to constrained problems. As a second contribution, we thus derive new results for non-strict constraints on the shortfall of inter¬mediate wealth and/or consumption
Portfolio Optimization and Mortgage Choice
This paper studies the optimal mortgage choice of an investor in a simple bond market with a stochastic interest rate and access to term life insurance. The study is based on advances in stochastic control theory, which provides analytical solutions to portfolio problems with a stochastic interest rate. We derive the optimal portfolio of a mortgagor in a simple framework and formulate stylized versions of mortgage products offered in the market today. This allows us to analyze the optimal investment strategy in terms of optimal mortgage choice. We conclude that certain extreme investors optimally choose either a traditional fixed rate mortgage or an adjustable rate mortgage, while investors with moderate risk aversion and income prefer a mix of the two. By matching specific investor characteristics to existing mortgage products, our study provides a better understanding of the complex and yet restricted mortgage choice faced by many household investors. In addition, the simple analytical framework enables a detailed analysis of how changes to market, income and preference parameters affect the optimal mortgage choice
Continuing Risks
Risks will soon celebrate its tenth anniversary. We would like to take this opportunity to thank all authors, readers, and reviewers of the past decade. Ten years ago, Risks was the new journal in the class; a journal that entered a competitive classroom with enough self-confidence to believe that it had a role to play there. This new journal immediately became the rebellious student in the class. Risks stood up against conventions and challenged the power of habits. Risks had, and still has, some unique features in terms of both its format and content that make it stand out from its peers
Stable Dividends under Linear-Quadratic Optimization
The optimization criterion for dividends from a risky business is most often
formalized in terms of the expected present value of future dividends. That
criterion disregards a potential, explicit demand for stability of dividends.
In particular, within actuarial risk theory, maximization of future dividends
have been intensively studied as the so-called de Finetti problem. However,
there the optimal strategies typically become so-called barrier strategies.
These are far from stable and suboptimal affine dividend strategies have
therefore received attention recently. In contrast, in the class of
linear-quadratic problems a demand for stability if explicitly stressed. These
have most often been studied in diffusion models different from the actuarial
risk models. We bridge the gap between these patterns of thinking by deriving
optimal affine dividend strategies under a linear-quadratic criterion for a
general L\'evy process. We characterize the value function by the
Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman equation, solve it, and compare the objective and the
optimal controls to the classical objective of maximizing expected present
value of future dividends. Thereby we provide a framework within which
stability of dividends from a risky business, as e.g. in classical risk theory,
is explicitly demanded and explicitly obtained
Consumption and wage humps in a life-cycle model with education
The observed hump-shaped life-cycle pattern in individuals' consumption cannot be explained by the classical consumption-savings model. We explicitly solve a model with utility of both consumption and leisure and with educational decisions affecting future wages. We show optimal consumption is hump shaped and determine the peak age. The hump results from consumption and leisure being substitutes and from the implicit price of leisure being decreasing over time; more leisure means less education, which lowers future wages, and the present value of foregone wages decreases with age. Consumption is hump shaped whether the wage is hump shaped or increasing over life
Fairness: plurality, causality, and insurability
This article summarizes the main topics, findings, and avenues for future work from the workshop Fairness with a view towards insurance held August 2023 in Copenhagen, Denmark
- …