A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis to Evaluate a System Change in Mental Healthcare in the Netherlands for Patients with Depression or Anxiety

Over the last decade, the Dutch mental healthcare system has been subject to profound policy reforms, in order to achieve affordable, accessible, and high quality care. One of the adjustments was to substitute part of the specialized care for general mental healthcare. Using a quasi-experimental design, we compared the cost-effectiveness of patients in the new setting with comparable patients from specialized mental healthcare in the old setting. Results showed that for this group of patients the average cost of treatment was significantly reduced by, on average, €2132 (p < 0.001), with similar health outcomes as in the old system

Collaborative Mental Health Care Versus Care as Usual in a Primary Care Setting: A Randomized Controlled Trial

De samenhang tussen somatische en psychische (dys)functie

Preliminary effects of a digital mental health intervention for depression and anxiety

Background: Digital mental healthcare interventions (DMHIs) have been repeatedly mentioned as a possible solution for the growing demand for accessible treatment for patients suffering from common mental health problems, i.e. depression and anxiety disorders. However, structural implementation of DMHI is sparse and results on outcome seems inconclusive. To enrich the body of evidence, this paper compares a need-driven digital mental healthcare intervention (DMHI) for patients diagnosed with depression or anxiety disorders with traditional face-to-face treatment. The digital treatment is provided using a smartphone app which provides videoconferencing, chat, calendar- and registration functions. Method: In a naturalistic retrospective cohort study patients who received DMHI are compared to patients who received traditional face-to-face treatment. Furthermore three illustrative cases were selected to demonstrate how personalization is expressed in individual treatments. Results: The first results of the DMHI compare favorably with traditional face-to-face treatment, showing comparable satisfaction rates, equal effectiveness, and a significant decrease in treatment duration in weeks. Conclusion: The DMHI has the potential to be as effective, but more efficient than traditional face-to-face treatment. Furthermore the digital treatment opens up options to fine-tune the frequency, duration, and content of care contacts to align with patients' individual situations and personal preferences

Prediction of Mental Health Services Use One Year After Regular Referral to Specialized Care Versus Referral to Stepped Collaborative Care

Referral to collaborative mental health care within the primary care setting is a service concept that has shown to be as effective as direct referral to specialized mental health care for patients with common mental disorders. Additionally it is more efficient in terms of lower mental health services use. This post-hoc analysis examines if treatment intensity during 1-year of follow-up can be predicted prospectively by baseline characteristics. With multilevel multivariate regression analyses baseline characteristics were examined as potential predictors of visit counts. Results showed that only the enabling factors service concept and referral delay for treatment had a significant association with mental health visit counts, when outcome was dichotomized in five or more visits. Inclusion of the outcome variable as a count variable confirmed the predictive value of service concept and referral delay, but added marital status as a significant predictor. Overall, enabling factors (service concept and referral delay) seem to be important and dominant predictors of mental health services use