1 research outputs found
Ethical, legal, and practical concerns about recontacting patients to inform them of new information: The case in medical genetics
- Author
- Ad Hoc Committee on Genetic Counseling
- Andrews
- Annas
- Baylis
- Beauchamp
- Berg
- Berg
- Birminghan
- Blanchette v. Barrett
- Blum
- Canterbury v. Spence
- Cepelewicz
- Ciarlariello v. Schacter
- De Wert
- Dean
- Eysenbach
- Ferguson
- Fitzpatrick
- Freese v. Lemmon
- Genetic Information and Health Insurance
- Getty v. Hoffman-LaRoche Inc
- Gorab v. Zook
- H. (R.) v. Hunter
- Hall
- Havens v. Ritchey
- Hedlund v. Superior Ct
- Hirschhorn
- Hirsh
- Hodge
- Hoemke v. New York Blood Center
- Humphreys
- Jadad
- Jadad
- Jadad
- Jolly v. Eli Lilly Co
- Joy v. Eastern Maine Medical Center
- Joyal v. Starreveld
- Kim
- Klimchuk
- Kuszler
- Leedy v. Hartnett
- Lemmens
- Lipari v. Sears-Roebuck and Co
- Lippman
- Longman v. Jasiek
- Macklin
- Meyer
- Miller v. Sullivan
- Mink v. University of Chicago
- Morreim
- Murray
- Nadel
- National Society of Genetic Counselors
- Neudeck v. Vestal
- Pelias
- Pratt v. University of Minnesota Affiliated Hospitals and Clinics
- Procanik by Procanik v. Cillo
- Procanik v. Cillo
- Reisner v. Regents of University of California
- Reyes v. Anka Research Ltd
- Robertson
- Rosoff
- Schuck
- Severin
- Sharpe
- Sharpe
- Sharpe
- Sharpe
- Simonsen v. Swenson
- Snow v. AH Robins Company Inc
- Spielberg
- Sugerman
- Tanner v. Norys
- Tanuz v. Carlberg
- Tarasoff v. Regents of University of California
- Terry
- Torres
- Tresemer v. Barke
- Troxel v. A.I. Dupont Institute
- Vasdani v. Sehmi
- Walters v. Rinker
- Weaver
- Welsh v. McCarthy
- Wickline v. State
- Wilson v. Blue Cross of Southern California
- Publication venue
- 'Wiley'
- Publication date
- 01/01/2001
- Field of study