Evidence-based guidelines for bleeding in trauma patients: where do we go from here?

The development of evidence-based guidelines has gained popularity as a strategy to reduce variation in practice and to orient clinical care around documentable best practices. Based on available data, the new European guidelines for the management of bleeding in the trauma patient do deliver a number of sound recommendations. However, some issues remain controversial and, like many guidelines, the actual translation of these evidence-based recommendations into routine clinical practice protocols continues to leave opportunity for variation. Nevertheless, this consensus guideline provides an excellent starting point. As evidence continues to accumulate, future iterations should provide greater specificity and move us closer to the definitive best practice

Macroeconomic trends and practice models impacting acute care surgery

Acute care surgery (ACS) diagnoses are responsible for approximately a quarter of the costs of inpatient care in the US government, and individuals will be responsible for a larger share of the costs of this healthcare as the population ages. ACS as a specialty thus has the opportunity to meet a significant healthcare need, and by optimizing care delivery models do so in a way that improves both quality and value. ACS practice models that have maintained or added emergency general surgery (EGS) and even elective surgery have realized more operative case volume and surgeon satisfaction. However, vulnerabilities exist in the ACS model. Payer mix in a practice varies by geography and distribution of EGS, trauma, critical care, and elective surgery. Critical care codes constitute approximately 25% of all billing by acute care surgeons, so even small changes in reimbursement in critical care can have significant impact on professional revenue. Staffing an ACS practice can be challenging depending on reimbursement and due to uneven geographic distribution of available surgeons. Empowered by an understanding of economics, using team-oriented leadership inherent to trauma surgeons, and in partnership with healthcare organizations and regulatory bodies, ACS surgeons are positioned to significantly influence the future of healthcare in the USA

Estrogen treatment following severe burn injury reduces brain inflammation and apoptotic signaling

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Patients with severe burn injury experience a rapid elevation in multiple circulating pro-inflammatory cytokines, with the levels correlating with both injury severity and outcome. Accumulations of these cytokines in animal models have been observed in remote organs, however data are lacking regarding early brain cytokine levels following burn injury, and the effects of estradiol on these levels. Using an experimental animal model, we studied the acute effects of a full-thickness third degree burn on brain levels of TNF-α, IL-1β, and IL-6 and the protective effects of acute estrogen treatment on these levels. Additionally, the acute administration of estrogen on regulation of inflammatory and apoptotic events in the brain following severe burn injury were studied through measuring the levels of phospho-ERK, phospho-Akt, active caspase-3, and PARP cleavage in the placebo and estrogen treated groups.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>In this study, 149 adult Sprague-Dawley male rats received 3rd degree 40% total body surface area (TBSA) burns. Fifteen minutes following burn injury, the animals received a subcutaneous injection of either placebo (n = 72) or 17 beta-estradiol (n = 72). Brains were harvested at 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 18, and 24 hours after injury from the control (n = 5), placebo (n = 8/time point), and estrogen treated animals (n = 8/time point). The brain cytokine levels were measured using the ELISA method. In addition, we assessed the levels of phosphorylated-ERK, phosphorylated-Akt, active caspase-3, and the levels of cleaved PARP at the 24 hour time-point using Western blot analysis.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>In burned rats, 17 beta-estradiol significantly decreased the levels of brain tissue TNF-α (~25%), IL-1β (~60%), and IL-6 (~90%) when compared to the placebo group. In addition, we determined that in the estrogen-treated rats there was an increase in the levels of phospho-ERK (<it>p </it>< 0.01) and Akt (<it>p </it>< 0.05) at the 24 hour time-point, and that 17 beta-estradiol blocked the activation of caspase-3 (<it>p </it>< 0.01) and subsequent cleavage of PARP (<it>p </it>< 0.05).</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Following severe burn injury, estrogens decrease both brain inflammation and the activation of apoptosis, represented by an increase in the levels of phospho-Akt and inhibition of caspase-3 activation and PARP cleavage. Results from these studies will help further our understanding of how estrogens protect the brain following burn injury, and may provide a novel, safe, and effective clinical treatment to combat remote secondary burn injury in the brain and to preserve cognition.</p

Whole Blood Resuscitation and Association with Survival in Injured Patients with an Elevated Probability of Mortality.

BACKGROUND: Low-titer group O whole blood (LTOWB) resuscitation is becoming common in both military and civilian settings and may represent the ideal resuscitation intervention. We sought to characterize the safety and efficacy of LTOWB resuscitation relative to blood component resuscitation. STUDY DESIGN: A prospective, multicenter, observational cohort study was performed using 7 trauma centers. Injured patients at risk of massive transfusion who required both blood transfusion and hemorrhage control procedures were enrolled. The primary outcome was 4-hour mortality. Secondary outcomes included 24-hour and 28-day mortality, achievement of hemostasis, death from exsanguination, and the incidence of unexpected survivors. RESULTS: A total of 1,051 patients in hemorrhagic shock met all enrollment criteria. The cohort was severely injured with \u3e70% of patients requiring massive transfusion. After propensity adjustment, no significant 4-hour mortality difference across LTOWB and component patients was found (relative risk [RR] 0.90, 95% CI 0.59 to 1.39, p = 0.64). Similarly, no adjusted mortality differences were demonstrated at 24 hours or 28 days for the enrolled cohort. When patients with an elevated prehospital probability of mortality were analyzed, LTOWB resuscitation was independently associated with a 48% lower risk of 4-hour mortality (relative risk [RR] 0.52, 95% CI 0.32 to 0.87, p = 0.01) and a 30% lower risk of 28-day mortality (RR 0.70, 95% CI 0.51 to 0.96, p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Early LTOWB resuscitation is safe but not independently associated with survival for the overall enrolled population. When patients were selected with an elevated probability of mortality based on prehospital injury characteristics, LTOWB was independently associated with a lower risk of mortality starting at 4 hours after arrival through 28 days after injury

A genomic storm in critically injured humans

Critical injury in humans induces a genomic storm with simultaneous changes in expression of innate and adaptive immunity genes