3 research outputs found
Immigration policy in European Union - between the liberal and restrictive concept
Π’Π΅ΠΌΠ° Π΄ΠΎΠΊΡΠΎΡΡΠΊΠ΅ Π΄ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ°ΡΠΈΡΠ΅ ΡΡ ΠΈΠΌΠΈΠ³ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π΅ ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡΠΈΠΊΠ΅ Ρ ΠΠ²ΡΠΎΠΏΡΠΊΠΎΡ ΡΠ½ΠΈΡΠΈ.
ΠΡΠ΅Π΄ΠΌΠ΅Ρ ΠΈΡΡΡΠ°ΠΆΠΈΠ²Π°ΡΠ° Π½Π°ΡΡΠΎΡΠΈ Π΄Π° ΠΈΡΡΡΠ°ΠΆΠΈ ΠΈΠΌΠΈΠ³ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π΅ ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡΠΈΠΊΠ΅ Ρ ΠΠ²ΡΠΎΠΏΡΠΊΠΎΡ ΡΠ½ΠΈΡΠΈ ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠ΅ΡΡ Π»ΠΈΠ±Π΅ΡΠ°Π»Π½ΠΎΠ³ ΠΈ ΡΠ΅ΡΡΡΠΈΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΠ³ ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΡΠ΅ΠΏΡΠ°.
ΠΠΎΠ»Π°Π·Π½Π° Ρ
ΠΈΠΏΠΎΡΠ΅Π·Π° Ρ ΠΈΡΡΡΠ°ΠΆΠΈΠ²Π°ΡΡ ΡΠ΅ Π΄Π° Ρ ΠΠ²ΡΠΎΠΏΡΠΊΠΎΡ ΡΠ½ΠΈΡΠΈ ΠΈΠΌΠ° ΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠ»ΠΈΠΊΠΎ ΠΈΠΌΠΈΠ³ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΎΠ½ΠΈΡ
ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡΠΈΠΊΠ° ΠΊΠΎΠ»ΠΈΠΊΠΎ ΠΈΠΌΠ° Π΄ΡΠΆΠ°Π²Π° ΡΠ»Π°Π½ΠΈΡΠ° (ΡΠ· ΠΈΠΌΠΈΠ³ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Ρ ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡΠΈΠΊΡ Π±ΡΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠΊΠ΅ Π°Π΄ΠΌΠΈΠ½ΠΈΡΡΡΠ°ΡΠΈΡΠ΅), ΡΠ΅ Π΄Π° ΡΠ΅ ΡΠ²Π΅ ΠΈΠΌΠΈΠ³ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π΅ ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡΠΈΠΊΠ΅ ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠ΅ΠΆΡ Π½Π° ΠΈΠ΄Π΅Π°Π»Π½ΠΎ-ΡΠΈΠΏΡΠΊΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΡΡΠ°Π²ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΎΡ ΡΠΊΠ°Π»ΠΈ ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠ΅ΡΡ Π»ΠΈΠ±Π΅ΡΠ°Π»Π½ΠΎΠ³ ΠΈ ΡΠ΅ΡΡΡΠΈΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΠ³ ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΡΠ΅ΠΏΡΠ°.
ΠΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ°ΡΠΈΡΠ° ΡΠ΅ ΡΠΈΡΠ°Π² ΡΠ΅ΠΎΡΠΈΡΡΠΊΠΎ-ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΡΠΊΠΈ ΠΎΠΊΠ²ΠΈΡ ΠΏΠΎΡΡΠ°Π²ΠΈΠ»Π° Ρ ΠΏΠ΅Ρ Π²Π΅Π»ΠΈΠΊΠΈΡ
ΠΏΠΎΡΠ΅Π±Π½ΠΈΡ
Ρ
ΠΈΠΏΠΎΡΠ΅Π·Π° ΠΊΠΎΡΠ΅ ΡΡΠ΅Π±Π° Π΄Π° Π²Π΅ΡΠΈΡΠΈΠΊΡΡΡ ΠΏΠΎΠ»Π°Π·Π½ΠΈ Ρ
ΠΈΠΏΠΎΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΡΠΊΠΈ ΠΎΠΊΠ²ΠΈΡ: Π΄Π΅ΠΌΠΎΠ³ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΡΠ°, ΠΊΡΠ»ΡΡΡΠ°/ΠΈΠ΄Π΅Π½ΡΠΈΡΠ΅Ρ, Π΅ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠΌΠΈΡΠ°, ΡΠΎΡΠΈΡΠ°Π»Π½Π° ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡΠΈΠΊΠ° ΠΈ ΡΠΈΠ³ΡΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡ (Π±Π΅Π·Π±Π΅Π΄Π½ΠΎΡΡ).
Π£ ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΡΠΊΠΎΠΌ ΡΠΌΠΈΡΠ»Ρ Π±ΠΈΡΠ΅ ΠΎΠ±Π°Π²ΡΠ΅Π½Π° ΡΡΠΎΡΡΡΡΠΊΠ° Π²Π΅ΡΠΈΡΠΈΠΊΠ°ΡΠΈΡΠ° ΠΎΠΏΡΡΠ΅Π³ Ρ
ΠΈΠΏΠΎΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ ΠΎΠΊΠ²ΠΈΡΠ°: ΡΠ΅ΠΎΡΠΈΡΡΠΊΠΎ-ΡΠ°Π·Π½Π°ΡΠ½Π°, Π΅ΠΌΠΏΠΈΡΠΈΡΡΠΊΠ° ΠΈ ΡΡΡΠ΄ΠΈΡΠ° ΡΠ»ΡΡΠ°ΡΠ° (Π·Π° ΠΠ²ΡΠΎΠΏΡΠΊΡ ΡΠ½ΠΈΡΡ ΠΊΠ°ΠΎ ΡΠ΅Π»ΠΈΠ½Ρ ΠΈΠ»ΠΈ Π΅Π½ΡΠΈΡΠ΅Ρ-ΠΏΠΎ-ΡΠ΅Π±ΠΈ, ΠΈ Π·Π° Π‘Π ΠΠ΅ΠΌΠ°ΡΠΊΡ ΠΈ ΠΠ°ΡΠ°ΡΡΠΊΡ).
Π£ Π΄ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ°ΡΠΈΡΠΈ ΡΠ΅ Π±ΠΈΡΠΈ ΠΊΠΎΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅Π½ ΡΠΈΡΠ°Π² ΡΠΏΠ»Π΅Ρ Π½Π°ΡΡΠ½ΠΈΡ
ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄Π°: ΠΈΠ· Π΄ΡΡΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ
Π½Π°ΡΠΊΠ° (ΠΏΠΎΡΠΌΠ°ΡΡΠ°ΡΠ΅, Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·Π° ΡΠ°Π΄ΡΠΆΠ°ΡΠ°, ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄ ΠΈΠ΄Π΅Π°Π»Π½ΠΈΡ
ΡΠΈΠΏΠΎΠ²Π°, ΡΠ°Π·Π²ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΈ ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄, ΡΠΏΠΎΡΠ΅Π΄Π½ΠΈ...), ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡΠΈΠΊΠΎΠ»ΠΎΡΠΊΠΈ ΠΏΡΠΈΡΡΡΠΏΠΈ (ΠΈΠ½ΡΡΠΈΡΡΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π°Π»Π½ΠΈ, ΡΠ΅Π°Π»-ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡΠΈΡΠΊΠΈ), ΠΏΡΠ°Π²Π½Π΅ ΡΠ΅Ρ
Π½ΠΈΠΊΠ΅ (Π΄ΠΎΠ³ΠΌΠ°ΡΡΠΊΠΎ-Π½ΠΎΡΠΌΠ°ΡΠΈΠ²ΠΈΡΡΠΈΡΠΊΠΈ ΠΏΡΠΈΡΡΡΠΏ, ΡΠΈΡΠ½ΠΎ ΡΡΠΌΠ°ΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅, ΡΡΠ°ΡΠΈΡΠΊΠΎ ΡΡΠΌΠ°ΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅), Π»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠΊΠ° Π·Π°ΠΊΡΡΡΠΈΠ²Π°ΡΠ° (ΠΈΠ½Π΄ΡΠΊΡΠΈΡΠ°, Π΄Π΅Π΄ΡΠΊΡΠΈΡΠ°, Π΄ΠΈΡΠ°Π»Π΅ΠΊΡΠΈΡΠΊΠΈ ΠΏΡΠΈΡΡΡΠΏ).
Π£ ΠΏΡΠΎΡΡΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠΌ ΡΠΌΠΈΡΠ»Ρ ΠΈΡΡΡΠ°ΠΆΠΈΠ²Π°ΡΠ΅ Π·Π°Ρ
Π²Π°ΡΠ° 28 Π΄ΡΠΆΠ°Π²Π° ΡΠ»Π°Π½ΠΈΡΠ° ΠΠ²ΡΠΎΠΏΡΠΊΠ΅ ΡΠ½ΠΈΡΠ΅, ΠΊΠ°ΠΎ ΠΈ ΠΠ²ΡΠΎΠΏΡΠΊΡ ΡΠ½ΠΈΡΡ ΠΊΠ°ΠΎ ΡΠ΅Π»ΠΈΠ½Ρ (ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡΠΈΠΊΡ Π±ΡΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠΊΠ΅ Π°Π΄ΠΌΠΈΠ½ΠΈΡΡΡΠ°ΡΠΈΡΠ΅). Π£ Π²ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΠΊΠΎΠΌ ΠΎΠΊΠ²ΠΈΡΡ ΠΈΡΡΡΠ°ΠΆΠΈΠ²Π°ΡΠ΅ ΡΠ΅ ΡΡΡΠ΅Π΄ΡΡΠ΅ΡΡΡΠ΅ Π½Π° ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠΈΠΎΠ΄ ΠΎΠ΄ Π½Π°ΡΡΠ°Π½ΠΊΠ° Π²Π΅Π»ΠΈΠΊΠ΅ ΠΌΠΈΠ³ΡΠ°Π½ΡΡΠΊΠ΅ ΠΊΡΠΈΠ·Π΅ 2011. Π³ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠ½Π΅ Π΄ΠΎ Π΄Π°Π½Π°Ρ, ΡΠ° Π·Π½Π°ΡΠ°ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΌ Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·ΠΎΠΌ ΡΠ°Π·Π²ΠΎΡΠ° ΠΌΠΈΠ³ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΡΡΠΊΠΈΡ
ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΎΠΌΠ΅Π½Π° Ρ Π΅Π²ΡΠΎΠΏΡΠΊΠΈΠΌ Π·Π΅ΠΌΡΠ°ΠΌΠ° ΠΎΠ΄ ΠΡΡΠ³ΠΎΠ³ ΡΠ²Π΅ΡΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ ΡΠ°ΡΠ° Π΄ΠΎ Π΄Π°Π½Π°Ρ.
ΠΠΊΡΡΠ΅Π»Π½ΠΎΡΡ ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ΅, ΠΏΠΎΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΈΡΠ΅ ΠΊΠΎΡΠ΅ ΠΌΠ°ΡΠΎΠ²Π½Π΅ ΠΌΠΈΠ³ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΡΠ΅ ΠΈΠ·Π°Π·ΠΈΠ²Π°ΡΡ Ρ ΡΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡΠΊΠΈΠΌ Π΄ΡΡΡΡΠ²ΠΈΠΌΠ°, ΡΠ»ΠΎΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΎΡΡ Π½ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ½Π°ΡΡΠ°Π»ΠΈΡ
ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡΠΈΡΠΊΠΈΡ
ΠΎΠ΄Π½ΠΎΡΠ° ΡΠ½ΡΡΠ°Ρ ΡΠ°ΠΌΠ΅ ΠΠ²ΡΠΎΠΏΡΠΊΠ΅ ΡΠ½ΠΈΡΠ΅ (ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠ΅ΡΡ ΠΡΠΈΡΠ΅Π»Π° ΠΈ Π΄ΡΠΆΠ°Π²Π° ΡΠ»Π°Π½ΠΈΡΠ°, ΠΊΠ°ΠΎ ΠΈ ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠ΅ΡΡ ΡΠ°ΠΌΠΈΡ
ΡΠ»Π°Π½ΠΈΡΠ°) ΡΠΊΠ°Π·ΡΡΡ Π½Π° ΠΎΠΏΡΠ°Π²Π΄Π°Π½ΠΎΡΡ ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ΅ ΠΈ ΡΠ΅Π½ Π΄ΡΡΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½ΠΈ Π·Π½Π°ΡΠ°Ρ.
ΠΠ°ΡΡΠ½ΠΈ Π΄ΠΎΠΌΠ°ΡΠ°Ρ ΠΈΡΡΡΠ°ΠΆΠΈΠ²Π°ΡΠ° ΠΎΠ³Π»Π΅Π΄Π°ΠΎ Π±ΠΈ ΡΠ΅ Ρ: Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·ΠΈ Π΄Π΅ΡΡΡΠ²Π° ΠΌΠΈΠ³ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΡΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΎΠΌΠ΅Π½Π° Π½Π° ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡΠΈΡΠΊΠ΅ ΠΎΠ΄Π½ΠΎΡΠ΅ Ρ ΠΠ²ΡΠΎΠΏΠΈ; ΠΈΡΡΡΠ°ΠΆΠΈΠ²Π°ΡΡ ΠΏΠΎΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΈΡΠ° ΠΊΠΎΡΠ΅ ΠΎΠ²ΠΎ Π΄Π΅ΡΡΡΠ²ΠΎ ΠΈΠ·Π°Π·ΠΈΠ²Π°; Π΄ΠΎΠ½ΠΎΡΠ΅ΡΡ Π·Π°ΠΊΡΡΡΠ°ΠΊΠ°, ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π²ΠΈΠ΄ΠΈΠ²ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΡΠΎΠΊΠΎΠ²Π° ΠΈ Π½ΡΡΠ΅ΡΡ ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π»ΠΎΠ³Π° ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠ° ΠΊΠ°ΠΊΠΎ Π±ΠΈ ΡΠ΅ ΠΏΡΡΠΆΠΈΠΎ ΠΎΠ΄Π³ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΡ Π½Π° ΠΎΠ²ΠΎ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ±Π»Π΅ΠΌΡΠΊΠΎ ΠΏΠΈΡΠ°ΡΠ΅.
Π¦ΠΈΡ ΠΈΡΡΡΠ°ΠΆΠΈΠ²Π°ΡΠ° ΡΠ΅: Π΄Π° Π΄ΠΎΠΊΠ°ΠΆΠ΅ ΠΏΠΎΡΡΠΎΡΠ°ΡΠ΅ ΡΠ°Π·Π»ΠΈΡΠΈΡΠΈΡ
ΠΈΠΌΠΈΠ³ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΎΠ½ΠΈΡ
ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡΠΈΠΊΠ° Ρ ΠΠ²ΡΠΎΠΏΡΠΊΠΎΡ ΡΠ½ΠΈΡΠΈ; Π΄Π° ΠΎΠ²Π΅ ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡΠΈΠΊΠ΅ ΠΏΡΠΈΠΊΠ°ΠΆΠ΅ ΠΈ ΠΈΠ·Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·ΠΈΡΠ°; Π΄Π° ΡΡΠ²ΡΠ΄ΠΈ Π΅ΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠ΅ Π΄Π΅Π»ΠΎΠ²Π°ΡΠ° ΠΌΠΈΠ³ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΡΠ° Π½Π° Π΄ΡΠΆΠ°Π²Π΅ ΡΠ»Π°Π½ΠΈΡΠ΅, ΠΠ²ΡΠΎΠΏΡΠΊΡ ΡΠ½ΠΈΡΡ ΠΊΠ°ΠΎ ΡΠ΅Π»ΠΈΠ½Ρ ΠΈ Π΄ΡΠΆΠ°Π²Π΅-ΠΊΠ°Π½Π΄ΠΈΠ΄Π°ΡΠ΅; Π΄Π° ΡΡΠ²ΡΠ΄ΠΈ ΠΏΠ°ΡΠ°ΠΌΠ΅ΡΡΠ΅ ΡΡΠΈΡΠ°ΡΠ° Π½Π° ΠΈΠΌΠΈΠ³ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Ρ ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡΠΈΠΊΡ; Π΄Π° ΠΈΠ·Π½Π΅ΡΠ΅ Π·Π°ΠΊΡΡΡΠΊΠ΅, ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π²ΠΈΡΠ°ΡΠ° ΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΠ½ΡΠ΄ΠΈ ΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅ΡΠ° ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ³ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ±Π»Π΅ΠΌΠ°The topic of the doctoral dissertation is immigration policies in the European Union. The subject of the research seeks to explore immigration policies in the European Union between a liberal and a restrictive concept.
The starting hypothesis of the study is that there are as many immigration policies in the European Union as there are Member States (+ Brussels administration immigration policy), and that all immigration policies extend on an ideally-typed scale between liberal and restrictive concepts.
The dissertation has set the completely theoretical and methodological framework into five big specific hypotheses that should verify the starting hypothetical framework: demography, culture / identity, economy, social policy and security (safeness). In a methodological sense, a threefold verification of the General Hypothetical Framework will be carried out: Theoretical - Cognitive, Empirical and Case Study (for the European Union as a whole or entity-by-itself and for the Federal Republic of Germany and Hungary).
The dissertation will use the whole set of scientific methods: from social sciences (observation, content analysis, ideal types method, development method, comparative...), political science approaches (institutional, real political), legal techniques (dogmatic - normativistic approach, goal interpretation, static interpretation), logical reasoning (induction, deduction, dialectical approach).
In spatial terms, the survey covers 28 Member States of the European Union, as well as the European Union as a whole (Brussels administration policy). Within the timeframe, the research focuses on the period from the onset of the Great Migrant Crisis in 2011 to the present, with a significant analysis of the evolution of migration phenomena in European countries from World War II to the present. Actuality of the topic, the consequences of mass migration in immigrant societies, the complexity of emerging political relations within the European Union itself (between Brussels and the Member States, and between the Member States) indicate the justification of the topic and its social importance.
The scientific reach of the research would be reflected in an analysis of the impact of the migration phenomenon on political relations in Europe; investigating the consequences of this action; making conclusions, predictability of flows and proposing measures to answer the problematic question.
The aim of the research is to prove the existence of different immigration policies in the European Union; to present and analyze these policies; to determine the effects of migration on Member States, the European Union as a whole and candidate countries; to determine the parameters of the impact on immigration policy; to draw conclusions, predictions and offer solutions to solve the proble
The impact of social and monetary diaspora remittances on society and economy of home countru: The case of Serbia
The paper provides an overview of both social and monetary diaspora remittances and their societal and economic impacts. Since migration is never a sole "muscle drain" (labor power drain), but always to a certain extent a "brain drain", the study analyzes possible effects of high-skilled international migration (highly-skilled diaspora). In addition, the pros and cons of monetary remittances are summarized and analyzed. Being among the countries with the largest Diasporas relative to the total nation's population, Serbia represents a rich case study for societal and economic impacts of social and monetary diaspora remittances
Immigration policy in European Union - between the liberal and restrictive concept
Π’Π΅ΠΌΠ° Π΄ΠΎΠΊΡΠΎΡΡΠΊΠ΅ Π΄ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ°ΡΠΈΡΠ΅ ΡΡ ΠΈΠΌΠΈΠ³ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π΅ ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡΠΈΠΊΠ΅ Ρ ΠΠ²ΡΠΎΠΏΡΠΊΠΎΡ ΡΠ½ΠΈΡΠΈ.
ΠΡΠ΅Π΄ΠΌΠ΅Ρ ΠΈΡΡΡΠ°ΠΆΠΈΠ²Π°ΡΠ° Π½Π°ΡΡΠΎΡΠΈ Π΄Π° ΠΈΡΡΡΠ°ΠΆΠΈ ΠΈΠΌΠΈΠ³ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π΅ ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡΠΈΠΊΠ΅ Ρ ΠΠ²ΡΠΎΠΏΡΠΊΠΎΡ ΡΠ½ΠΈΡΠΈ ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠ΅ΡΡ Π»ΠΈΠ±Π΅ΡΠ°Π»Π½ΠΎΠ³ ΠΈ ΡΠ΅ΡΡΡΠΈΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΠ³ ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΡΠ΅ΠΏΡΠ°.
ΠΠΎΠ»Π°Π·Π½Π° Ρ
ΠΈΠΏΠΎΡΠ΅Π·Π° Ρ ΠΈΡΡΡΠ°ΠΆΠΈΠ²Π°ΡΡ ΡΠ΅ Π΄Π° Ρ ΠΠ²ΡΠΎΠΏΡΠΊΠΎΡ ΡΠ½ΠΈΡΠΈ ΠΈΠΌΠ° ΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠ»ΠΈΠΊΠΎ ΠΈΠΌΠΈΠ³ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΎΠ½ΠΈΡ
ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡΠΈΠΊΠ° ΠΊΠΎΠ»ΠΈΠΊΠΎ ΠΈΠΌΠ° Π΄ΡΠΆΠ°Π²Π° ΡΠ»Π°Π½ΠΈΡΠ° (ΡΠ· ΠΈΠΌΠΈΠ³ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Ρ ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡΠΈΠΊΡ Π±ΡΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠΊΠ΅ Π°Π΄ΠΌΠΈΠ½ΠΈΡΡΡΠ°ΡΠΈΡΠ΅), ΡΠ΅ Π΄Π° ΡΠ΅ ΡΠ²Π΅ ΠΈΠΌΠΈΠ³ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π΅ ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡΠΈΠΊΠ΅ ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠ΅ΠΆΡ Π½Π° ΠΈΠ΄Π΅Π°Π»Π½ΠΎ-ΡΠΈΠΏΡΠΊΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΡΡΠ°Π²ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΎΡ ΡΠΊΠ°Π»ΠΈ ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠ΅ΡΡ Π»ΠΈΠ±Π΅ΡΠ°Π»Π½ΠΎΠ³ ΠΈ ΡΠ΅ΡΡΡΠΈΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΠ³ ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΡΠ΅ΠΏΡΠ°.
ΠΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ°ΡΠΈΡΠ° ΡΠ΅ ΡΠΈΡΠ°Π² ΡΠ΅ΠΎΡΠΈΡΡΠΊΠΎ-ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΡΠΊΠΈ ΠΎΠΊΠ²ΠΈΡ ΠΏΠΎΡΡΠ°Π²ΠΈΠ»Π° Ρ ΠΏΠ΅Ρ Π²Π΅Π»ΠΈΠΊΠΈΡ
ΠΏΠΎΡΠ΅Π±Π½ΠΈΡ
Ρ
ΠΈΠΏΠΎΡΠ΅Π·Π° ΠΊΠΎΡΠ΅ ΡΡΠ΅Π±Π° Π΄Π° Π²Π΅ΡΠΈΡΠΈΠΊΡΡΡ ΠΏΠΎΠ»Π°Π·Π½ΠΈ Ρ
ΠΈΠΏΠΎΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΡΠΊΠΈ ΠΎΠΊΠ²ΠΈΡ: Π΄Π΅ΠΌΠΎΠ³ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΡΠ°, ΠΊΡΠ»ΡΡΡΠ°/ΠΈΠ΄Π΅Π½ΡΠΈΡΠ΅Ρ, Π΅ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠΌΠΈΡΠ°, ΡΠΎΡΠΈΡΠ°Π»Π½Π° ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡΠΈΠΊΠ° ΠΈ ΡΠΈΠ³ΡΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡ (Π±Π΅Π·Π±Π΅Π΄Π½ΠΎΡΡ).
Π£ ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΡΠΊΠΎΠΌ ΡΠΌΠΈΡΠ»Ρ Π±ΠΈΡΠ΅ ΠΎΠ±Π°Π²ΡΠ΅Π½Π° ΡΡΠΎΡΡΡΡΠΊΠ° Π²Π΅ΡΠΈΡΠΈΠΊΠ°ΡΠΈΡΠ° ΠΎΠΏΡΡΠ΅Π³ Ρ
ΠΈΠΏΠΎΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ ΠΎΠΊΠ²ΠΈΡΠ°: ΡΠ΅ΠΎΡΠΈΡΡΠΊΠΎ-ΡΠ°Π·Π½Π°ΡΠ½Π°, Π΅ΠΌΠΏΠΈΡΠΈΡΡΠΊΠ° ΠΈ ΡΡΡΠ΄ΠΈΡΠ° ΡΠ»ΡΡΠ°ΡΠ° (Π·Π° ΠΠ²ΡΠΎΠΏΡΠΊΡ ΡΠ½ΠΈΡΡ ΠΊΠ°ΠΎ ΡΠ΅Π»ΠΈΠ½Ρ ΠΈΠ»ΠΈ Π΅Π½ΡΠΈΡΠ΅Ρ-ΠΏΠΎ-ΡΠ΅Π±ΠΈ, ΠΈ Π·Π° Π‘Π ΠΠ΅ΠΌΠ°ΡΠΊΡ ΠΈ ΠΠ°ΡΠ°ΡΡΠΊΡ).
Π£ Π΄ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ°ΡΠΈΡΠΈ ΡΠ΅ Π±ΠΈΡΠΈ ΠΊΠΎΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅Π½ ΡΠΈΡΠ°Π² ΡΠΏΠ»Π΅Ρ Π½Π°ΡΡΠ½ΠΈΡ
ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄Π°: ΠΈΠ· Π΄ΡΡΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ
Π½Π°ΡΠΊΠ° (ΠΏΠΎΡΠΌΠ°ΡΡΠ°ΡΠ΅, Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·Π° ΡΠ°Π΄ΡΠΆΠ°ΡΠ°, ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄ ΠΈΠ΄Π΅Π°Π»Π½ΠΈΡ
ΡΠΈΠΏΠΎΠ²Π°, ΡΠ°Π·Π²ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΈ ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄, ΡΠΏΠΎΡΠ΅Π΄Π½ΠΈ...), ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡΠΈΠΊΠΎΠ»ΠΎΡΠΊΠΈ ΠΏΡΠΈΡΡΡΠΏΠΈ (ΠΈΠ½ΡΡΠΈΡΡΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π°Π»Π½ΠΈ, ΡΠ΅Π°Π»-ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡΠΈΡΠΊΠΈ), ΠΏΡΠ°Π²Π½Π΅ ΡΠ΅Ρ
Π½ΠΈΠΊΠ΅ (Π΄ΠΎΠ³ΠΌΠ°ΡΡΠΊΠΎ-Π½ΠΎΡΠΌΠ°ΡΠΈΠ²ΠΈΡΡΠΈΡΠΊΠΈ ΠΏΡΠΈΡΡΡΠΏ, ΡΠΈΡΠ½ΠΎ ΡΡΠΌΠ°ΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅, ΡΡΠ°ΡΠΈΡΠΊΠΎ ΡΡΠΌΠ°ΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅), Π»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠΊΠ° Π·Π°ΠΊΡΡΡΠΈΠ²Π°ΡΠ° (ΠΈΠ½Π΄ΡΠΊΡΠΈΡΠ°, Π΄Π΅Π΄ΡΠΊΡΠΈΡΠ°, Π΄ΠΈΡΠ°Π»Π΅ΠΊΡΠΈΡΠΊΠΈ ΠΏΡΠΈΡΡΡΠΏ).
Π£ ΠΏΡΠΎΡΡΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠΌ ΡΠΌΠΈΡΠ»Ρ ΠΈΡΡΡΠ°ΠΆΠΈΠ²Π°ΡΠ΅ Π·Π°Ρ
Π²Π°ΡΠ° 28 Π΄ΡΠΆΠ°Π²Π° ΡΠ»Π°Π½ΠΈΡΠ° ΠΠ²ΡΠΎΠΏΡΠΊΠ΅ ΡΠ½ΠΈΡΠ΅, ΠΊΠ°ΠΎ ΠΈ ΠΠ²ΡΠΎΠΏΡΠΊΡ ΡΠ½ΠΈΡΡ ΠΊΠ°ΠΎ ΡΠ΅Π»ΠΈΠ½Ρ (ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡΠΈΠΊΡ Π±ΡΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠΊΠ΅ Π°Π΄ΠΌΠΈΠ½ΠΈΡΡΡΠ°ΡΠΈΡΠ΅). Π£ Π²ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΠΊΠΎΠΌ ΠΎΠΊΠ²ΠΈΡΡ ΠΈΡΡΡΠ°ΠΆΠΈΠ²Π°ΡΠ΅ ΡΠ΅ ΡΡΡΠ΅Π΄ΡΡΠ΅ΡΡΡΠ΅ Π½Π° ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠΈΠΎΠ΄ ΠΎΠ΄ Π½Π°ΡΡΠ°Π½ΠΊΠ° Π²Π΅Π»ΠΈΠΊΠ΅ ΠΌΠΈΠ³ΡΠ°Π½ΡΡΠΊΠ΅ ΠΊΡΠΈΠ·Π΅ 2011. Π³ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠ½Π΅ Π΄ΠΎ Π΄Π°Π½Π°Ρ, ΡΠ° Π·Π½Π°ΡΠ°ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΌ Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·ΠΎΠΌ ΡΠ°Π·Π²ΠΎΡΠ° ΠΌΠΈΠ³ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΡΡΠΊΠΈΡ
ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΎΠΌΠ΅Π½Π° Ρ Π΅Π²ΡΠΎΠΏΡΠΊΠΈΠΌ Π·Π΅ΠΌΡΠ°ΠΌΠ° ΠΎΠ΄ ΠΡΡΠ³ΠΎΠ³ ΡΠ²Π΅ΡΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ ΡΠ°ΡΠ° Π΄ΠΎ Π΄Π°Π½Π°Ρ.
ΠΠΊΡΡΠ΅Π»Π½ΠΎΡΡ ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ΅, ΠΏΠΎΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΈΡΠ΅ ΠΊΠΎΡΠ΅ ΠΌΠ°ΡΠΎΠ²Π½Π΅ ΠΌΠΈΠ³ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΡΠ΅ ΠΈΠ·Π°Π·ΠΈΠ²Π°ΡΡ Ρ ΡΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡΠΊΠΈΠΌ Π΄ΡΡΡΡΠ²ΠΈΠΌΠ°, ΡΠ»ΠΎΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΎΡΡ Π½ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ½Π°ΡΡΠ°Π»ΠΈΡ
ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡΠΈΡΠΊΠΈΡ
ΠΎΠ΄Π½ΠΎΡΠ° ΡΠ½ΡΡΠ°Ρ ΡΠ°ΠΌΠ΅ ΠΠ²ΡΠΎΠΏΡΠΊΠ΅ ΡΠ½ΠΈΡΠ΅ (ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠ΅ΡΡ ΠΡΠΈΡΠ΅Π»Π° ΠΈ Π΄ΡΠΆΠ°Π²Π° ΡΠ»Π°Π½ΠΈΡΠ°, ΠΊΠ°ΠΎ ΠΈ ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠ΅ΡΡ ΡΠ°ΠΌΠΈΡ
ΡΠ»Π°Π½ΠΈΡΠ°) ΡΠΊΠ°Π·ΡΡΡ Π½Π° ΠΎΠΏΡΠ°Π²Π΄Π°Π½ΠΎΡΡ ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ΅ ΠΈ ΡΠ΅Π½ Π΄ΡΡΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½ΠΈ Π·Π½Π°ΡΠ°Ρ.
ΠΠ°ΡΡΠ½ΠΈ Π΄ΠΎΠΌΠ°ΡΠ°Ρ ΠΈΡΡΡΠ°ΠΆΠΈΠ²Π°ΡΠ° ΠΎΠ³Π»Π΅Π΄Π°ΠΎ Π±ΠΈ ΡΠ΅ Ρ: Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·ΠΈ Π΄Π΅ΡΡΡΠ²Π° ΠΌΠΈΠ³ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΡΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΎΠΌΠ΅Π½Π° Π½Π° ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡΠΈΡΠΊΠ΅ ΠΎΠ΄Π½ΠΎΡΠ΅ Ρ ΠΠ²ΡΠΎΠΏΠΈ; ΠΈΡΡΡΠ°ΠΆΠΈΠ²Π°ΡΡ ΠΏΠΎΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΈΡΠ° ΠΊΠΎΡΠ΅ ΠΎΠ²ΠΎ Π΄Π΅ΡΡΡΠ²ΠΎ ΠΈΠ·Π°Π·ΠΈΠ²Π°; Π΄ΠΎΠ½ΠΎΡΠ΅ΡΡ Π·Π°ΠΊΡΡΡΠ°ΠΊΠ°, ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π²ΠΈΠ΄ΠΈΠ²ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΡΠΎΠΊΠΎΠ²Π° ΠΈ Π½ΡΡΠ΅ΡΡ ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π»ΠΎΠ³Π° ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠ° ΠΊΠ°ΠΊΠΎ Π±ΠΈ ΡΠ΅ ΠΏΡΡΠΆΠΈΠΎ ΠΎΠ΄Π³ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΡ Π½Π° ΠΎΠ²ΠΎ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ±Π»Π΅ΠΌΡΠΊΠΎ ΠΏΠΈΡΠ°ΡΠ΅.
Π¦ΠΈΡ ΠΈΡΡΡΠ°ΠΆΠΈΠ²Π°ΡΠ° ΡΠ΅: Π΄Π° Π΄ΠΎΠΊΠ°ΠΆΠ΅ ΠΏΠΎΡΡΠΎΡΠ°ΡΠ΅ ΡΠ°Π·Π»ΠΈΡΠΈΡΠΈΡ
ΠΈΠΌΠΈΠ³ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΎΠ½ΠΈΡ
ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡΠΈΠΊΠ° Ρ ΠΠ²ΡΠΎΠΏΡΠΊΠΎΡ ΡΠ½ΠΈΡΠΈ; Π΄Π° ΠΎΠ²Π΅ ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡΠΈΠΊΠ΅ ΠΏΡΠΈΠΊΠ°ΠΆΠ΅ ΠΈ ΠΈΠ·Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·ΠΈΡΠ°; Π΄Π° ΡΡΠ²ΡΠ΄ΠΈ Π΅ΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠ΅ Π΄Π΅Π»ΠΎΠ²Π°ΡΠ° ΠΌΠΈΠ³ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΡΠ° Π½Π° Π΄ΡΠΆΠ°Π²Π΅ ΡΠ»Π°Π½ΠΈΡΠ΅, ΠΠ²ΡΠΎΠΏΡΠΊΡ ΡΠ½ΠΈΡΡ ΠΊΠ°ΠΎ ΡΠ΅Π»ΠΈΠ½Ρ ΠΈ Π΄ΡΠΆΠ°Π²Π΅-ΠΊΠ°Π½Π΄ΠΈΠ΄Π°ΡΠ΅; Π΄Π° ΡΡΠ²ΡΠ΄ΠΈ ΠΏΠ°ΡΠ°ΠΌΠ΅ΡΡΠ΅ ΡΡΠΈΡΠ°ΡΠ° Π½Π° ΠΈΠΌΠΈΠ³ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Ρ ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡΠΈΠΊΡ; Π΄Π° ΠΈΠ·Π½Π΅ΡΠ΅ Π·Π°ΠΊΡΡΡΠΊΠ΅, ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π²ΠΈΡΠ°ΡΠ° ΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΠ½ΡΠ΄ΠΈ ΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅ΡΠ° ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ³ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ±Π»Π΅ΠΌΠ°The topic of the doctoral dissertation is immigration policies in the European Union. The subject of the research seeks to explore immigration policies in the European Union between a liberal and a restrictive concept.
The starting hypothesis of the study is that there are as many immigration policies in the European Union as there are Member States (+ Brussels administration immigration policy), and that all immigration policies extend on an ideally-typed scale between liberal and restrictive concepts.
The dissertation has set the completely theoretical and methodological framework into five big specific hypotheses that should verify the starting hypothetical framework: demography, culture / identity, economy, social policy and security (safeness). In a methodological sense, a threefold verification of the General Hypothetical Framework will be carried out: Theoretical - Cognitive, Empirical and Case Study (for the European Union as a whole or entity-by-itself and for the Federal Republic of Germany and Hungary).
The dissertation will use the whole set of scientific methods: from social sciences (observation, content analysis, ideal types method, development method, comparative...), political science approaches (institutional, real political), legal techniques (dogmatic - normativistic approach, goal interpretation, static interpretation), logical reasoning (induction, deduction, dialectical approach).
In spatial terms, the survey covers 28 Member States of the European Union, as well as the European Union as a whole (Brussels administration policy). Within the timeframe, the research focuses on the period from the onset of the Great Migrant Crisis in 2011 to the present, with a significant analysis of the evolution of migration phenomena in European countries from World War II to the present. Actuality of the topic, the consequences of mass migration in immigrant societies, the complexity of emerging political relations within the European Union itself (between Brussels and the Member States, and between the Member States) indicate the justification of the topic and its social importance.
The scientific reach of the research would be reflected in an analysis of the impact of the migration phenomenon on political relations in Europe; investigating the consequences of this action; making conclusions, predictability of flows and proposing measures to answer the problematic question.
The aim of the research is to prove the existence of different immigration policies in the European Union; to present and analyze these policies; to determine the effects of migration on Member States, the European Union as a whole and candidate countries; to determine the parameters of the impact on immigration policy; to draw conclusions, predictions and offer solutions to solve the proble