PANC Study (Pancreatitis: A National Cohort Study): national cohort study examining the first 30 days from presentation of acute pancreatitis in the UK

Abstract Background Acute pancreatitis is a common, yet complex, emergency surgical presentation. Multiple guidelines exist and management can vary significantly. The aim of this first UK, multicentre, prospective cohort study was to assess the variation in management of acute pancreatitis to guide resource planning and optimize treatment. Methods All patients aged greater than or equal to 18 years presenting with acute pancreatitis, as per the Atlanta criteria, from March to April 2021 were eligible for inclusion and followed up for 30 days. Anonymized data were uploaded to a secure electronic database in line with local governance approvals. Results A total of 113 hospitals contributed data on 2580 patients, with an equal sex distribution and a mean age of 57 years. The aetiology was gallstones in 50.6 per cent, with idiopathic the next most common (22.4 per cent). In addition to the 7.6 per cent with a diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis, 20.1 per cent of patients had a previous episode of acute pancreatitis. One in 20 patients were classed as having severe pancreatitis, as per the Atlanta criteria. The overall mortality rate was 2.3 per cent at 30 days, but rose to one in three in the severe group. Predictors of death included male sex, increased age, and frailty; previous acute pancreatitis and gallstones as aetiologies were protective. Smoking status and body mass index did not affect death. Conclusion Most patients presenting with acute pancreatitis have a mild, self-limiting disease. Rates of patients with idiopathic pancreatitis are high. Recurrent attacks of pancreatitis are common, but are likely to have reduced risk of death on subsequent admissions. </jats:sec

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in geriatric psychiatry: A clinical overview

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) has been used widely in adult patients with depression and resistant auditory hallucinations. There is a paucity of data for rTMS use in geriatric patients for these indications. Recent research has revealed newer avenues for the use of rTMS in clinical geriatric psychiatry practice which includes mild cognitive impairment and dementia. rTMS is also being looked at as an effective treatment when combined with cognitive training in the management of Alzheimer's disease. The present review discusses the various uses of rTMS in geriatric psychiatry. This paper analyzes the various studies done with rTMS in older patients in various indications and the safety and efficacy of the procedure are also evaluated. The need for further studies in this area using larger samples is also mentioned

Real World Effectiveness of rTMS in Depression and Anxiety

Aims Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) is a non-invasive brain stimulation recommended by NICE for treatment of depression with minimal side-effects and a high patient acceptability. Our aim was to assess the effectiveness of rTMS in real world clinical service in alleviating symptoms of depression and anxiety. Methods All patients receiving rTMS in our Centre for Neuromodulation Services (CNS) received 5 daily treatment sessions a week for a period of 5 weeks (25 sessions in total). All patients routinely completed PHQ-9, BDI-II and GAD-7 measures before and after the course of treatment. The scores on these measures were retrospectively analysed using paired-sample t-test. Results All 15 patients completed the PHQ-9 and GAD-7 scales while 10 patients completed BDI-II. Eleven patients (73%) had improved PHQ-9 scores post-treatment with average improvement of 5.5 points which was statistically significant [paired-sample t-test: t(14) = 3.019, p = 0.009]. Nine patients (90%) had improved BDI-II scores post-treatment with average reduction of 36% from baseline which was statistically significant [t(9) = 3.681, p = 0.005]. Eleven patients (73%) had improved GAD-7 scores post-treatment, with average reduction of 4 points. This reduction was also statistically significant [t(14) = 3.038, p = 0.009]. Improvement in all measures was also of a level that would be considered clinically significant for these measures. All patients tolerated the treatment well with no patients dropping out due to side effects. Conclusion With the limitation of relatively small sample size, our initial analysis indicates that rTMS treatment offered in real world clinical service is effective in treating symptoms of depression. Although our protocol was not intended to treat anxiety, our patients had remarkable improvement in anxiety symptoms as well

Antidepressant effects of ketamine and ECT: a pilot comparison

Background: To compare the antidepressant effects and cognitive adverse effects of intravenous ketamine infusion and Electro-convulsive therapy (ECT) in persons with severe depressive episodes. Methods: This assessor-blinded randomized control trial included 25 patients (either sex; 18–65 years) meeting ICD-10 criteria for severe depression (bipolar or unipolar). Patients received either ECT (n = 13) or intravenous infusions of ketamine hydrochloride (0.5 mg/kg over 45 min; n = 12) for six alternate day sessions over a period of two weeks. Severity of depression was assessed at baseline and on every alternate day of intervention using the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS) and self-reported Beck Depression Inventory (BDI). Results Baseline socio-demographic and clinical variables including HDRS (ECT: 25.15±6.58; Ketamine: 23.33±4.05, p = 0.418) and BDI (ECT: 37.07±6.58; Ketamine: 33.33±9.29; p = 0.254) were comparable. Repeated-measures analysis of variance revealed that ECT patients showed significantly greater reduction in HDRS (group*time interaction effect; F = 4.79;