Functional selectivity of GPCR-directed drug action through location bias.

G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are increasingly recognized to operate from intracellular membranes as well as the plasma membrane. The β 2 -adrenergic GPCR can activate G s -linked cyclic AMP (G s -cAMP) signaling from endosomes. We show here that the homologous human β 1 -adrenergic receptor initiates an internal G s -cAMP signal from the Golgi apparatus. By developing a chemical method to acutely squelch G-protein coupling at defined membrane locations, we demonstrate that Golgi activation contributes significantly to the overall cellular cAMP response. Golgi signaling utilizes a preexisting receptor pool rather than receptors delivered from the cell surface, requiring separate access of extracellular ligands. Epinephrine, a hydrophilic endogenous ligand, accesses the Golgi-localized receptor pool by facilitated transport requiring the organic cation transporter 3 (OCT3), whereas drugs can access the Golgi pool by passive diffusion according to hydrophobicity. We demonstrate marked differences, among both agonist and antagonist drugs, in Golgi-localized receptor access and show that β-blocker drugs currently used in the clinic differ markedly in ability to antagonize the Golgi signal. We propose \u27location bias\u27 as a new principle for achieving functional selectivity of GPCR-directed drug action

Synergic PDE3 and PDE4 control intracellular cAMP and cardiac excitation-contraction coupling in a porcine model

International audienc

Interventricular Differences in β‐Adrenergic Responses in the Canine Heart: Role of Phosphodiesterases

Background RV and LV have different embryologic, structural, metabolic, and electrophysiologic characteristics, but whether interventricular differences exist in β‐adrenergic (β‐AR) responsiveness is unknown. In this study, we examine whether β‐AR response and signaling differ in right (RV) versus left (LV) ventricles. Methods and Results Sarcomere shortening, Ca2+ transients, ICa,L and IKs currents were recorded in isolated dog LV and RV midmyocytes. Intracellular [cAMP] and PKA activity were measured by live cell imaging using FRET‐based sensors. Isoproterenol increased sarcomere shortening ≈10‐fold and Ca2+‐transient amplitude ≈2‐fold in LV midmyocytes (LVMs) versus ≈25‐fold and ≈3‐fold in RVMs. FRET imaging using targeted Epac2camps sensors revealed no change in subsarcolemmal [cAMP], but a 2‐fold higher β‐AR stimulation of cytoplasmic [cAMP] in RVMs versus LVMs. Accordingly, β‐AR regulation of ICa,L and IKs were similar between LVMs and RVMs, whereas cytoplasmic PKA activity was increased in RVMs. Both PDE3 and PDE4 contributed to the β‐AR regulation of cytoplasmic [cAMP], and the difference between LVMs and RVMs was abolished by PDE3 inhibition and attenuated by PDE4 inhibition. Finally LV and RV intracavitary pressures were recorded in anesthetized beagle dogs. A bolus injection of isoproterenol increased RV dP/dtmax≈5‐fold versus 3‐fold in LV. Conclusion Canine RV and LV differ in their β‐AR response due to intrinsic differences in myocyte β‐AR downstream signaling. Enhanced β‐AR responsiveness of the RV results from higher cAMP elevation in the cytoplasm, due to a decreased degradation by PDE3 and PDE4 in the RV compared to the LV

A CaMKII/PDE4D negative feedback regulates cAMP signaling

cAMP production and protein kinase A (PKA) are the most widely studied steps in β-adrenergic receptor (βAR) signaling in the heart; however, the multifunctional Ca(2+)/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II (CaMKII) is also activated in response to βAR stimulation and is involved in the regulation of cardiac excitation-contraction coupling. Its activity and expression are increased during cardiac hypertrophy, in heart failure, and under conditions that promote arrhythmias both in animal models and in the human heart, underscoring the clinical relevance of CaMKII in cardiac pathophysiology. Both CaMKII and PKA phosphorylate a number of protein targets critical for Ca(2+) handling and contraction with similar, but not always identical, functional consequences. How these two pathways communicate with each other remains incompletely understood, however. To maintain homeostasis, cyclic nucleotide levels are regulated by phosphodiesterases (PDEs), with PDE4s predominantly responsible for cAMP degradation in the rodent heart. Here we have reassessed the interaction between cAMP/PKA and Ca(2+)/CaMKII signaling. We demonstrate that CaMKII activity constrains basal and βAR-activated cAMP levels. Moreover, we show that these effects are mediated, at least in part, by CaMKII regulation of PDE4D. This regulation establishes a negative feedback loop necessary to maintain cAMP/CaMKII homeostasis, revealing a previously unidentified function for PDE4D as a critical integrator of cAMP/PKA and Ca(2+)/CaMKII signaling

Rôle des phosphodiestérases des nucléotides cycliques de types 3 et 4 dans le couplage excitation-contraction et les arythmies cardiaques

Les phosphodiestérases des nucléotides cycliques (PDE) constituent une superfamille d’enzymes spécialisées dans la dégradation de l’AMPc et du GMPc. Les PDE de types 3 et 4 sont les deux familles majeures impliquées dans la régulation des taux d’AMPc cardiaques et dans le contrôle de l’inotropisme. Les protéines de ces deux familles sont codées par plusieurs gènes. Des études récentes du phénotype cardiaque de souris invalidées pour ces différents gènes ont permis de mieux comprendre leur rôle dans la régulation des acteurs du couplage excitation-contraction (CEC) cardiaque. En particulier, ces travaux soulignent le caractère local de la régulation des acteurs du CEC par les PDE, ainsi que leur rôle dans le maintien de l’homéostasie calcique intracellulaire et la prévention des troubles du rythme

Compartimentation des nucléotides cycliques dans le coeur

International audienc

PDEs create local domains of cAMP signaling

International audienceIn the light of the knowledge accumulated over the years, it becomes clear that intracellular cAMP is not uniformly distributed within cardiomyocytes and that cAMP compartmentation is required for adequate processing and targeting of the information generated at the membrane. Localized cAMP signals may be generated by interplay between discrete production sites and restricted diffusion within the cytoplasm. In addition to specialized membrane structures that may limit cAMP spreading, degradation of the second messenger by cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterases (PDEs) appears critical for the formation of dynamic microdomains that confer specificity of the response to various hormones. This review will cover the role of the different cAMP-PDE isoforms in this process